In addition to the above:
POPULATION GROWTH FORMULA REFUTES EVOLUTION THEORIES: Besides C-14 dating of dinosaur bones and other fossils (peer reviewed references provided in previous posts), dinosaur depictions world side , and fossil human and dinosaur footprints together from Africa, Russia TX (two locations), NM etc there is another line of evidence that totally decimates the theory of human evolution while supporting the historical narrative given to Moses regarding the global flood. It is the equation for predicting human population growth; it can be found on page 525 of the book “Biology” by Raven and Johnson with details on the Kolbe Center web site
www.kolbecenter.org.
By studying the population growth in the past scientists have learned the following facts: (1) There is reliable data on world population for the past 400 years of 0.465% . (2) During the ‘plague years’, the growth rate was only 0.318 globally, but the other centuries were around 0.7% to 1.8% globally. (3) The AVERAGE annual growth rate (birth data – death rate would come out slightly less than ½ of one percent. or 0.456% for the past 400 years.
THE FLOOD YEARS a la Moses: The formula is: P = Po e rt(power) for all calculations. For “Po” put in 8 which is for Noah and his sons Shem, Ham, and Japheth and their wives. “r” is for the growth rate of 0.456% (0.00456 in the equation) and “t” is the time elapsed for the assumed ~4500 years since the flood of Noah; put in 2.718 for “e” the base of natural logarithms. Using a spread sheet for the calculations the population of today after 4500 years would be 6.5 billion people which is in agreement with the current world census. Of course the actual flood could have been 5000 years or more as we simply don’t know that scientifically but the point is that it is far closer to reality than the calculations for evolution of man using uniformitarian principles as shown below.
However if you take this very reliable 0.456 % growth rate (last 400 years) and plug it into the population formula with an evolutionary assumption of 500,000 years for one man and one woman’s emergence from their alleged apish ancestors you would get a population of 2.155 X 10 with 990 zeros after it. It has been suggested that that figure is more than the total number of electrons in the universe. Where does that leave the theory of human evolution?
Ok, the above is so ridiculous let’s look at scenario # 2: Enter initial population of 2, growth rate of ONLY 0.1% (0.001 in formula), enter time of ONLY 100,000 years instead of 500,000 years and you get a world population of 5.38 X 10 followed by 43 zeros [AGAIN ridiculous]. I guess you’d call that “giga years” as there is no designation for 43 zeros to my knowledge.
Ok, let’s try Scenario #3: enter 2 for initial population of evolving man and woman and being generous as possible plug in a growth rate of 0.1% (0.001 in formula) again and only 25,000 years for the elapsed time for evolution of one man and one woman and you get a world population equal to 1.44 X 10 with 11 zeros or 22 times our present population of 6.5 billion people on earth.
Now how about those Laetoli human footprints in volcanic tuft discovered by Mary Leakey’s team about 1979? Based on that wonderful tool called radiometric dating (K/Ar, Ar/Ar etc), those human footprints were calculated to be 3 million years old. Now plug those three million years into the population equation and see what you get. I don’t think I would want to waste all that paper to print out all those zeros.
So again what’s the point? Mainstream evolutionary science is ignoring reality; they are in a state of denial as their theories (ET or TE) are not even reasonable hypotheses based on direct C-14 dating of dinosaur bones, dinosaur depictions world-wide, fossil human footprints with and without dinosaur prints together, sedimentology research, and the population equation assuming a growth rate of the past 400 years. See book reviews etc on
www.kolbecenter.org and other links. The Kolbe Center was named after St. Maximilian Kolbe, who offered himself in place of a Jewish father during the Holocaust. The holocaust was a process of eliminating the unwanted which was supported by Adolf Hitler, a practicing evolutionist, initially Catholic.
Assumptions aside thanks to promotional practices of both ET’s and TE’s, some of whom hound CA threads the new global rates are lower than the replacement rate of 2.1 births….many countries are now – or will be – in deep trouble with a growing senior population, with no workers to replace them. The US has escaped this by selective and unenforced immigration laws. The drop in birth rate is contrary to the command given to Adam and Noah – to go forth and fill the earth. There are several causes – contraception and abortion , and women with careers in business, not in the home. I would not want to face the creator if I actively promoted the theory of evolution but we all have free will to promote whatever we want. In any event it is a good idea to Moses that Moses got it right; the evol ones got it wrong.
penWindow(‘cr/112.htm’)
1. Be especially attentive “to the content and unity of the whole Scripture”. Different as the books which compose it may be, Scripture is a unity by reason of the unity of God’s plan, of which Christ Jesus is the center and heart, open since his Passover.79
