Study shows G-rated fare more profitable

  • Thread starter Thread starter TPJCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TPJCatholic

Guest
**LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - A new study set to be released Tuesday shows that family-friendly movies are more profitable than R-rated films, throwing more fuel onto the fire of the long-running debate over sex and violence in entertainment – and whether it sells.

**The survey was commissioned by the Dove Foundation, a Grand Rapids, Mich.-based group that advocates wholesome family entertainment. According to its Web site, its advisory board includes radio talk show host Laura Schlessinger and “Touched By an Angel” executive producer Martha Williamson.

In a follow-up to a 10-year study commissioned by the foundation in 1999 – which found that between 1988-97 the average G-rated film made eight times the profit of an R-rated picture – an extension of that study found that trend continuing and expanding.

The new, expanded study examines the revenue and production costs for 3,000 Motion Picture Assn. of America-rated theatrical films released between Jan. 1, 1989, and Dec. 31, 2003, using the 200 most widely distributed films each year based on the number of theaters.

“While the movie industry produced nearly 12 times more R-rated films than G-rated films from 1989-2003, the average G-rated film produced 11 times greater profit than its R-rated counterpart,” said Dick Rolfe, the group’s founder and chairman.

The new study found that the average profit for films rated G rose to $92.3 million from $74.2 million, PG vaulted to $78.8 million from $9.9 million, PG-13 rose to $45.6 million from $15.4 million, and R-rated films increased to $17.9 million from $3 million. The study notes that those increases are probably due in part to higher ticket prices, coupled with a decrease in home video manufacturing costs.

More:

channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?id=2005060704040002116241&dt=20050607040400&w=RTR&coview=
 
Or maybe, that just means that Hollywood has to make more “R” rated movies to be just as profitable at “G” rated movies. I’ve never bought that economics of R-rated movies just for the fact that R-rated movies theoretically have the narrowest viewer base being age restricted.
 
“While the movie industry produced nearly 12 times more R-rated films than G-rated films from 1989-2003, the average G-rated film produced 11 times greater profit than its R-rated counterpart,” said Dick Rolfe, the group’s founder and chairman.
Right-y-o.
 
I’m not surprised in the least. I did a study on Disney in grad school and it showed how well they performed in the divisions that stuck to family friendly entertainment and how bad they did in the ones that ventured outside of that genre. And executives just couldn’t figure out why they were not doing as well. Hmmm.
 
Makes sense to me, kids like to go to the movies more often, you can take twice as many family members… since you don’t have to leave the kids at home. USually G movies don’t have the big name stars, or big expensive effects, so even if it only grosses 50 mil, if it can be made for under 20 mil, they’ve got a hit. Where as the big movies have to gross 100+ mil just to break even.

I wish there were more Family movies all year around. Especially in the JAn/Feb/March "leftover’ season of movie releases.
 
Michael Medved who made a living as a movie critic stated the same thing in his book Right Turns. He said unfortunately the kind of movies that Hollywood directors want to make, movies that are dark, ‘edgy’ or bizarre simply do not sell to the public. It is the ‘family fare’ that makes those cash registers sing. You’d think as avaricious as this group is, they’d catch on.

Lisa N
 
Lisa N:
Michael Medved who made a living as a movie critic stated the same thing in his book Right Turns. He said unfortunately the kind of movies that Hollywood directors want to make, movies that are dark, ‘edgy’ or bizarre simply do not sell to the public. It is the ‘family fare’ that makes those cash registers sing. You’d think as avaricious as this group is, they’d catch on.

Lisa N
The dark, edgy and bizarre ones often get the Oscars, of course. Glorify abortion (Cider House Rules), euthanasia (Million Dollar Baby), etc. and get a prize!

Robert.
Fellow Medved Fan
 
What hollywood doesn’t get is that for the most part when we watch movies, we want to be entertained, not necessarily have a life changing experience. I often just want to ‘zone out’ and have a good time with a movie, yes there are exeptions, but overall we just want to have a good time, AND do it as a family.
 
40.png
rlg94086:
The dark, edgy and bizarre ones often get the Oscars, of course. Glorify abortion (Cider House Rules), euthanasia (Million Dollar Baby), etc. and get a prize!

Robert.
Fellow Medved Fan
Isn’t that the truth? How about our favorite (NOT) Oscar winners like American Beauty and Ordinary People? Just goes to show that the people voting are not exactly mainstream.

Lisa N
 
American Beauty was a TOTAL waste of my time. It was too creepy with Kevin Spacey daydreaming about his daughters girlfriend.

Or that Awesome Oscar Winning movie “Beautiful Mind” :rolleyes:

That one about Kinsey the sex guy that everyone loved… yea, right… uh huh… bleh…
 
40.png
Brad:
I’m not surprised in the least. I did a study on Disney in grad school and it showed how well they performed in the divisions that stuck to family friendly entertainment and how bad they did in the ones that ventured outside of that genre. And executives just couldn’t figure out why they were not doing as well. Hmmm.
Where does that put The Straight Story ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top