Study: Vasectomy Linked to Higher Dementia Risk

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffalo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

buffalo

Guest
Study: Vasectomy Linked to Higher Dementia Risk

WASHINGTON – Men who have had a vasectomy may face an increased risk of developing a rare type of dementia marked by a steady loss of language skills, researchers said on Tuesday.
Researchers at Northwestern University in Illinois, writing in the journal Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, linked this male sterilization surgery to a neurological condition called primary progressive aphasia, or PPA.

more…
 
I have so many comments I could make, in a light hearted jocular vein, but am afraid I will lapse into uncharity, so I will forego them. It is a fact, sadly, that like any other drastic contraceptive pharmaceutical or surgery, there are side effects, some of them drastic, most of them unpublicized.
 
Why am I not surprised?

Anybody who’d let someone else whittle on his essentials wasn’t right in the head to begin with.😃
 
Pretty meaningless if one does not know the incidence of the condition in the first place – doubling one’s chances of getting something that only 1 person in a million gets is one kind of risk, doubling one’s chances of getting something that 1 person in ten gets is quite another.
 
Dementia means insanity…I would think a man would have to be insane to let someone cut in that area of the body.
 
Pretty meaningless if one does not know the incidence of the condition in the first place – doubling one’s chances of getting something that only 1 person in a million gets is one kind of risk, doubling one’s chances of getting something that 1 person in ten gets is quite another.
For what it’s worth in the nursing home where my wife is Assistant Director of Nursing, about 10% of the residents have some form of mental impairment.
 
I dont by this study, since I think any man who goes under the knife for that procedure was already predisposed for some form of insanity.
 
For what it’s worth in the nursing home where my wife is Assistant Director of Nursing, about 10% of the residents have some form of mental impairment.
That’s not exactly surprising (it being a nursing home) but it still is no guide to the incidence of one particular form of impairment.

**
 
That’s not exactly surprising (it being a nursing home) but it still is no guide to the incidence of one particular form of impairment.

**

I said, “for what it’s worth.”

But in a remote county of 10,000 people, to have half-a-dozen people with senile dementia would idicate that some form of mental impairment among the elderly is not rare.
 
I said, “for what it’s worth.”

But in a remote county of 10,000 people, to have half-a-dozen people with senile dementia would idicate that some form of mental impairment among the elderly is not rare.
Ah but it’s a “rare type of dementia” (primary progressive aphasia), how many included under the generic term “senile dementia” (not exactly rare) have the precise type involved in the study?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top