Source:
truthmagazine.com/archives/volume23/TM023299.html
The first day of the week is the Lord’s day. It is the only day in the week which can properly be called the “Lord’s day.”
When one remembers some of the important things which transpired on that day, he can see why the day came to be called the “Lord’s day.” On the first day of the week, Jesus arose from the dead (Mk. 16:1-9). On that day, he appeared to Mary Magdalene (Mk. 16:9); to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus (Lk. 24:13-35); to the apostles with Thomas absent (Jn. 20:19-25); to the apostles with Thomas present (Jn. 20:26-29); etc. Inasmuch as Pentecost always fell on the first day of the week (Lev. 23:15), these important events with reference to the early church occurred on the first day of the week: the coming of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:1-4), the first gospel sermon and the obedience of three thousand whom the Lord added to the church. Hence, the first day of the week was an important day for the early church.
Although these are definitely important things that happened on the first day, I don’t see how this permits a change. None of the gospel writers say a word about the first day being holy because Jesus rose from the grave on that day. Simply because special things occur on certain days, that doesn’t mean it makes that day holy, otherwise someone would have said such a change clearly.
The early church met habitually on the first day of the week to worship the Lord.
That this assembly occurred on the first day of the week is evident from the Scriptures as well. In 1 Cor. 16:1-2, Paul wrote, “Now concerning the collection for the saints, as I directed the churches of Galatia, so do you also. On the first day of every week let each one of you put aside and save, as he may prosper, that no collections be made when I come.” Notice several things from this verse. The instructions were given to a number of churches; these were not limited to Corinth. The instructions enjoined were to be observed on the first day of every week. Too, the instructions are not “come together to give” but “give while you are come together.” Hence, this passage is conclusive evidence that the early church worshiped on Sunday, the first day of the week, which day came to be known as the Lord’s day.
That is interesting. Would you mind telling me what you read that implied:
the instructions are not “come together to give” but “give while you are come together.”
As I read that chapter, it seems what’s happening is that there are needy people in Jerusalem and Paul is asking the Corinthians to donate. Paul is asking these people to individually set aside money to keep track of how much they will give according to their income. I personally don’t really see anything about worshiping though. This isn’t a public collection nor is any church service mentioned here. To me it seems more like they are setting aside the money so they will be able to donate it when the time comes. Hmm…
Furthermore, Acts 20:7 shows that the early church worshiped regularly on the first day of the week. Paul was on his way to Jerusalem on an urgent trip to take funds gathered for benevolent purposes for the saints in Jerusalem. However, he wanted to worship with the saints at Troas. Apparently, he arrived on Monday for he tarried seven days (Acts 20:6) to await the assembling of the saints. The Scriptures say, “And on the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight.” Notice, that Paul expected the church to assemble on the first day of the week and, for that reason, waited seven days to meet with them. Too, the early church usually met on that day to “break bread,” to observe the Lord’s supper.
Hmm, now this is definitely a worship service held on Sunday. However, to say that this happened regularly is a little bold of a statement in my opinion. Paul left the next day and in Acts it does say it is Paul’s custom to worship on the Sabbath. (Acts 13:14, 44; 17:2; 18:4). While it says it’s custom for Paul to worship on Sabbath, I can’t see where it says it was his custom to meet on the first day.
To be honest though, I am not sure why he met with the Troas on Sunday, but when people go to a mid week service on Wednesday, that doesn’t make Wednesday a blessed day of worship. Still, I think saying this text implies that this was the regular practice when it was never stated that such an important change was made is weighing quite heavily on the text.
Therefore, when we read that John was in the Spirit on the “Lord’s day,” we should properly understand that this was the first day of the week, the day set aside to worship and adore God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ. The Scriptural evidence is quite clear that the early church worshiped on the first day of the week. The change in the days of worship from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week occurred by divine decree.
It seems that when John said that, I don’t see whether he said it was on Sunday or Saturday. How can we say which day is the Lord’s day? As I personally see it, Jesus himself said that “The Son of man is Lord of the Sabbath” (Mat 12:8). Any day that can be rightfully called the Lords Day should be the day where Jesus himself claims to be Lord.