J
Jump4Joy
Guest
It seems more beneficial to be a thinker than a feeler. I’ve been more interested in Myer Brigg personality test and psychology. I’ve been told I’m a very sensitive person. Thinkers value reason, truth, justice, and objectivity above feeling. They seem more superior because they won’t be easily swayed by emotional arguments and people will trust them more. I’m more of a feeler. Emotional, sensitive and more intuitive. If you don’t have logic, you can’t prove anything. I’m not clairvoyant or anything. If something or someone gives me a bad feeling in my stomach or I have a terrifying dream about a situation I won’t associate or engage in that activity. To most it seems like I’m ruled by emotions. Or it seems irrational or I just need to get over my uncomfortable state.
I just know when I’m talking to someone if they’re lying, same way I can discern people’s intentions. Without evidence I sound crazy.
Just because someone or something makes you uncomfortable doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be stated.
Thinking emotionally is almost always seen as a bad thing
I just know when I’m talking to someone if they’re lying, same way I can discern people’s intentions. Without evidence I sound crazy.
Just because someone or something makes you uncomfortable doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be stated.
Thinking emotionally is almost always seen as a bad thing