Muslims believe the Gospel has been corrupt before the time of Mohammed but if they read the verse below:
“And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.” – Surah 5:47
How could God charge the people of the Gospel to judge if their Gospel was corrupt? I challenge any Muslim to justify this Surah…
I am Christian. But, being devil’s advocate, you see this. This is a fundimental point of view, looking at each word and not looking at the whole to see the meaning. So, I will be completely fundimental:
“Let the People of the Gospel judge.” That says that people can judge the Gospel, meaning that people can interpret it. Allah has “revealed” to his followers certain stuff.
“Whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, then it is those who are defiantly disobedient.” That’s the clicker.
If you do not take Allah’s words which are revealed to you and do not judge accordingly, then you are not doing his will, you are disobedient. So, you must find allah’s words or you are disobedient. If the words say, Let’s make everyone obey the laws of what allah has told us is right, if you do not do this, you are not doing his will!
On verse can change everything into life or ultimate destruction. If one verse is the ultimate aim, if someone wants that verse to be just that ultimate aim.
This verse says that if Allah teels you something… you have the right to do it…(yet, is it allah saying it or the devil? Or your own mind?) Are you sure that you are really doing what God wants of you in one verse or a paragragh. It’s called, “Taking it out of context.” It’s about taking verses without looking at thew whole meaning of what is being said…and many people do this.
Let’s take an example. Sorry I like using this one.
Saint Paul wrote to the Corinthians. It was a response to a letter he received from followers in Corinth. The were always asking questions about what they should be doing as folloowers of Christ because the Church was new and they had many questions. I love using this as the example…I am sorry.
The disciples in Corinth preached the “Good News” to a crowd. They gained any followers. Yet, some of them were women. This is where you must put history into the context to understand what Paul was saying because history shows us so much… more of a methodolical approach, but certainly puts things in perspective.
The disciples were upset that the women, who received the gospel that they told were so elated, that they danced in the streets. Ladies knowing they are saved from complete and utter destruction, decided to dance in gratitude to the Lord. Even David danced? So they did, too.
Who knows why, but the deciples of Christ were so upset about women danceing in the street and there inability to stop them they went to Paul.
Paul said…
This what is interesting… he says, Men should have their hair short, women their hair long and covered… unless they misbehave and you need to cover their hair with cloth… or if they step out of line…shave there heads. Women’s hair is the glory of man. Men’s hair is the gl;ory of Christ… so shave your head like monks…
What? Theologists look at that and wonder why is Paul going back to the OIld Testimant to say what should be needed when we are free from it.
In the end of that passage, Paul says, “Well, if there is any problem. It’s just the way things are…”
What?
Do you have any idea how many Fundamentalist Churches take the Word, “word for word?”
I don’t believe than people were comatosed when they wrote the “Word of God.” I think they wrote the, “Word of God,” under there own influence, brought about there culture and it was told by God this is, “Good.” It means we need to see the word of God as concepts not indicidual words.
Even though this is so, The verses from “Sarah” are there. But was the muslim person seeing that verse out of context with the rest of the writings. Or, whould the person look at everything… the whole writings… including the Old and New Testement?
The problem is in the translation. Muslims believe that the WOrd of God has been corrupted by many translations. The Karan is a version of the Bible they feel is more true…and Mahamid has found this and warned them of this and has given them the best version of the Bible to date. And what it says is true.
I believe that the muslims see there version of the Bible is true… the best version yet. Yet, we have our own version of the Bible and what we see as true by our magestarium. The problem is the conflict between the two. I beleive that 95% of muslims are peaceful. I knew one of them, a woman in college and found that person to be a very likable person. Knowing this…
Should we be quick to judge others beliefs and admonish them… r should we be the Catholics we are and show are true nature… the loving and caring people we are… putting love first and allow the Holy Spirit to help those, instead of trying to be the Holy Spirit and make them believe?
The greatest avangelistic question of all time. Are you doing it? Or, is the Holy Spirit doing the love you seek to give others?
