Two simple questions.
1 Who do you consider to be the “Author” of the Bible?
God is the “principal author,” as Catholic teaching says. Of course, each part of it has human authors as well who cooperated with the divine inspiration they were receiving.
2 Who do you consider to be the “Author” of the Qur’an?
I don’t know… definitely not God. Muhammad, probably. Maybe even an evil angel posing as Gabriel… I’m not sure, and I don’t think we can know. But it’s definitely not Scripture, even if there are some good things in it.
Why do you ask?
Somwewhat uncharitable, un-Christian and presumptuous. IMO
Not at all. My observation says nothing about the integrity or intentions of those who disagree with me in this debate; it speaks simply and solely of the philosophical ramifications and underpinnings of their position. To point
those out is not uncharitable in the least, nor is it presumptuous, since - as I said - it has nothing to do with your intention or integrity.
Somwewhat uncharitable and un-Christian IMO
Uncharitable to whom? Rinnie? Mickey? And for what reason?
Monotheistic does not just mean that you only worship one God, but that you ascribe to God qualities such that there could only possibly be one of Him.
You can have a false (or largely false–nothing can ever manage to be completely false) religion based on the true God. This is the point most people are overlooking or denying in this debate.
I’m interested in how Christians have traditionally defined it. And they have traditionally said that any monotheist is speaking of the true God.
That does not mean that all the things monotheists believe about God are true, or that their way of worshiping God is pleasing to God.
Edwin, your replies here are a beacon of precision and reason. Thank you for explaining this so clearly.
Boleyn,
what Edwin just said is the reason I claimed what I did about polytheism. “Is it a separate God?” is a meaningless question,
because there is only one God, and despite their other errors, Muslims acknowledge that there is only one God.
What prevents us from saying that they are wrong about what God has commanded?
I would really love an answer to this question from them, too. Even an acknowledgement of the question would be progress at this point.
It’s the “god” that they follow, per their book, that prescribed these things.
God did
not prescribe such immoral things.
We know that they worship a non-Triune god.
There is no such thing as a non-Triune god… the only Real God
is Triune.
Because your Church teaches that you are not held to believe everything the pope writes which is not ex-cathedra…or am I mistaken? Are you supposed to believe everything the pope writes…by pain of mortal sin?
This teaching doesn’t come from a pope. It comes from a council… the Second Vatican Council. And teachings of councils, while not necessarily infallible in every part, are generally supposed to be definitively held by the faithful.
I do not think that the millions of Christian martyrs who were murdered by the muslims would have thought there was a common bond…with a belief system that denies Christ. They happily went to their deaths before they would admit such a thing.
That the Muslims who martyred them are butchers whose violence is abhorrent to the One True God is not in dispute.
For me, to argue about whether the person answering the prayers of Muslims is the same God as Christianity is nonsensical. The answer is an obvious yes since there is no other God to answer anyway. Same applies for the Hindu who prays. The God that answers is the God of Christianity.
I think what you’ve just said is quite sensible. I have only one disagreement:
Hindus and Muslims are
not in the same category. On a philosophical level of transcendent monotheism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have basically the same concept of God. Hinduism, however, does not. It is pantheistic (or perhaps panentheistic in some estimations), and Brahman is simply not the same idea of “God” as the God of Abraham.
But for me to then claim that the Hindu or the Muslim is worshiping the same God is problematic.
Why?
If someone believes there is only one God, and believes that God to be eternal, transcendent, necessary, etc… then how can it be that they’re worshiping anyone or anything else
but God?
Whatever other errors they believe about God, however great, then constitute
errors about God.