What are your sources??
You are providing tons and tons of statements as fact, but none of them are supported… It would take a while to go through everything you wrote line by line… here’s my attempt:
In 1795, after the Dutch was ousted and British took over the reins in Cochin and Travancore, as princely states, British Resident of Travancore was requested by non-Catholic Christians in Kottayam formed in 1754 (upper Travancore revenue division) to send British missionaries to teach them. Thus in 1806 Rev Buchanan arrived. Based on his report to the British, CMS and LMS missionaries were allowed to come to Travancore. CMS missionaries were based in upper Travancore (in Kottayam) and LMS missionaries in lower Travancore.
Non-Catholic missionaries were first taught English and then jointly trained in their seminary for 20 years from 1816 -1836. In 1817 CMS missionaries set up CMS College which offered free English education for forty years, after which a very low nominal fee was charged.
Here you provide what seems to be factual historical statements, but complete unsupported and no way to verify or address anything.
On Mr Mathen after being trained at CMS seminary, then went on to Madras Christian College in Madras (now Chennai) set up by Scottish missionaries to complete secular college education. He and his friend, another Mathen on returning parted ways. One Mathen joined the Anglican Communion (MCC education under Scottish missionaries) and the other decided not to join the Anglican Communion. He decided to swear allegiance to the Patriarch of Antioch instead.
Not sure what this story has to do with anything? Who are these “Mathens” and what do they have to do with the previous or the following statements?
Thus the Synod was convened at Mavelikkara in 1936 and in the decrees (Padiola) the group under that particular Mathen accepted the Patriarch of Antioch as head.
Didn’t you earlier point out that Mavelikara was convened in the 1830s? What is this new Synod 100yrs later?
Up until this point all liturgy used to be in Malayalam.
I object. Which liturgy? at what point in time??? Malayalam is a “recent” language, the Liturgy would have to have been in some derivative of Tamil, if a vernacular was used at all… but all historical sources state that the Liturgy was Syriac - Eastern Syriac before the schism, Western Syriac for the non-Catholic Christians after the Schism (except for the Chaldean-Syrians in Trichur, who retained Eastern Syriac).
He then went to Antioch to be consecrated as bishop, spent more than a year overseas, familiarising himself with the language and liturgy in the Middle East.
Who?
When he returned, the large faction which joined him became the BAVA (Patriarch) faction. The faction that refused to accept the Patriarch became the Metran (bishop) faction.
No idea what you are referring to. There are no names, dates, places, or anything mentioned here.
From then on began the church litigation between these two factions. One priest from the BAVA faction and two priests from the Metran faction would leave and seek communion with Rome only several decades later, in 1930, to form the Syro Malankara Church in 1932.
How did 1930 come after 1936?
The first litigation had been immediately after the Synod of Mavelikkara in 1936 to gain access to the joint seminary.
Again, not sure what you are referring to…
At some point Patriarchs from the Middle East began to appear in Kerala, supporting the group which had sworn allegiance to them.
So… your claim is that a group can’t claim allegiance to a Patriarch if he personally hasn’t arrived in Kerala?? When did the Holy Father first come to Kerala? Did the Catholic Syrians not have loyalty to the Pope since he hadn’t “appeared” in Kerala?
The Anglican communion had being doing some missionary work in the Middle East. They provided Syriac Liturgy to the group that joined the Anglican communion, known as Mar Thoma Church.
Your claim is that the English create the Syriac liturgy and presented it to the Marthoma Church (protestant)? Then why do the Malankara Orthodox, Syriac Orthodox, Syro-Malankara Catholic use (West) Syriac in the Liturgy - none of these are in communion with Anglicans or Marthoma (protestant)? - as well as the Syro-Malabar and Chaldean-Syrian Churches (East Syriac)??
Two Patriarchs of two churches they helped form in Iraq and Mosul were consecrated in Anglican churches called Mar Thoma Church.
What? No idea what you are referring to.
So one can reasonably assume that non-Catholics on Malabar Coast had probably been taken care of by Dutch Calvinists until the arrival of CMS missionaries, which explains why they asked for the help of CMS missionaries first.
There is no Dutch calvinist Church in Kerala, the closest thing to that is the (Anglican) CSI Church - which is union of Methodist, Presbyterian, Anglican, and other protestants.
But CMS missionaries were low Anglican, an amalgamations of several European churches, who had come together to do missionary work, while the Scottish missionaries who started the Christian College Madras belonged to Church of Scotland which is the “high” Scottish version of Church of England.
There is no “high Scottish” Church of England - the Church of Scotland is Presbyterian (Calvinist), and they are lower church than most CofE low churchers.
