LeafByNiggle
Well-known member
Were the Bishops were writing about one kind of systemic racism and Andrew McCarthy writing about a different kind of systemic racism? If so, why should we care more about that racism the Andrew McCarthy defines and then says doesn’t exist than we do about the racism the bishops write about and say does exist? Isn’t the racism that does exist more important than the racism that doesn’t exist?Sure, you can call what the Bishops were writing about as racism, maybe systemic racism. It’s a bit unclear. There is a more precise definition.
Last edited: