T
TheRaiders
Guest
The Lutherans? I don’t know. They still celebrate too much what Martin Luther did. They consider him a hero. Would they undo what he, their hero, did?
Actually, the Anglian Use can not be used in England. It is forbidden. It was something that was worked out by the Vatican when it made the Anglican Use Liturgy as they did not wish to anger the Anglican bishops in England.I think that a lot of Anglicans who become Catholic really want the ROMAN liturgy, NOT the Anglican Use.
I remember reading that in England, there were some Anglican “priests” who who would “say Mass” using the old Roman Ritual(in Latin), while the choir was singing in English. Some of these men, I think, may have converted to Catholicism. They did not want an Anglican Use.
I count myself among those former Anglicans who wants to be completely “Roman”. I have no desire for the Anglican Use, but since Rome says it’s valid, of course I accept it!![]()
It should be noted that the Traditional Anglican Communion is not part of the 70+million member Anglican Communion.VATICAN CITY - As the Anglican Communion threatens to break up, one large group of Anglicans is blazing a trail to Rome, and another could follow suit.
The Traditional Anglican Communion, an autonomous group of 400,000 clergy and laity separate from the Anglican Communion, has drawn up detailed plans on how to come into full communion with the Holy See.
Two points:This sounds wonderful… just a couple issues hold this up.
One, the Anglicans would need to be conditionally re-ordained (or at least their Bishops would need to receive valid ordination from Catholics) unless some of them were ordained validly by Old Catholics, or in Abp Hepworth’s case, already ordained by the Church as a Priest. Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void” still.
Secondly, what to do about a married Episcopacy? Even the Orthodox do not have that. There hasn’t been a married Episcopacy in Christendom since a couple of centuries after the Patristic days. Married Priests, fine, but married Bishops?
As a former Anglican, I wonder if (with respect) you understand the Anglican Use. The Anglican Use is (with some minor differences) essentially the pre-Vatican II liturgy in English. The “Anglican Missal” was essentially the old Mass in 16th century English.I think that a lot of Anglicans who become Catholic really want the ROMAN liturgy, NOT the Anglican Use.
I remember reading that in England, there were some Anglican “priests” who who would “say Mass” using the old Roman Ritual(in Latin), while the choir was singing in English. Some of these men, I think, may have converted to Catholicism. They did not want an Anglican Use.
I count myself among those former Anglicans who wants to be completely “Roman”. I have no desire for the Anglican Use, but since Rome says it’s valid, of course I accept it!![]()
But I don’t want the old Mass in 16th century English. I want the old Mass in the official Latin text.As a former Anglican, I wonder if (with respect) you understand the Anglican Use. The Anglican Use is (with some minor differences) essentially the pre-Vatican II liturgy in English. The “Anglican Missal” was essentially the old Mass in 16th century English.
As a former Anglican (with VERY clean Apostolic Succession pedigree) who hopes for regularization within the bosum of the fullness of the faith, I would rejoice if I were assigned to an “Anglican Rite” parish – AND I would rejoice if I were assigned to a typical Catholic parish.
But my becoming Catholic does NOT require that I disparage the beauty, the goodness, and the truth of what WAS of value in the Anglican liturgy.
Blessings,
My understanding is that a married Anglican Bishop been accepting into the CC would function only as a married priest. I think this happened in Ft. Worth TX.but what about married bishop?
I think its the other way around. My AU parish started with 18 people. We now have about 400-500 families and most are from regular parishes that fall in love with the AU liturgy. I didI think that a lot of Anglicans who become Catholic really want the ROMAN liturgy, NOT the Anglican Use.
If many more Anglicans are wishing to come into full communion with Rome this may change… I would bet on it.Actually, the Anglian Use can not be used in England. It is forbidden. It was something that was worked out by the Vatican when it made the Anglican Use Liturgy as they did not wish to anger the Anglican bishops in England.
I don’t know how far you are from Scranton but there will be an AU parish there soon. I’m not familiar with the geography of Pennsylvania.if there were even an Anglican Use parish nearby, I would go there in a heartbeat.
A rite is already in use in a handful of former Episcopal parishes that converted in whole to the Roman Catholic Church. It is the Anglican Use.Maybe they could resurrect the Sarum Use of the Roman Rite for a possible Anglican Catholic Church? Just a thought…