Taking Pakistan's Temperature

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnjsdad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gnjsdad

Guest
A sobering reminder of the stakes in Pakistan. Of the failed attempt to kill Ayman Al Zawahiri, Al Qaeda’s #2 by airstrike, which nevertheless killed a number of innocent civilians,

William S. Lind of antiwar.com writes…

The fall of Pakistan to militant Islam will be a strategic disaster greater than anything possible in Iraq, even losing an army. It will be a greater disaster than a war with Iran that costs us our army in Iraq. Osama and Co. will have nukes, missiles to deliver them, the best conventional armed forces in the Muslim world, and an impregnable base for operations anywhere else. As North Korea’s Dear Leader has shown the world, nobody messes with you if you have nukes. Uncle Sam takes off his battle rattle and asks Beijing, or somebody, if they can possibly sponsor some talks.

And dealing with the same topic,

Andrew Bacevich writes in The American Conservative…

War In Error: Sending a General To Do A Sheriff’s Job

Small events sometimes reveal large truths. Last month’s U.S. missile strike in the remote Bajaur district of Pakistan was such an event. Aimed at taking out Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s chief deputy, the strike missed its intended target and killed as many as 18 residents of the small village of Damadola. But the episode did not end there: outraged Pakistanis rose up in protest; days of highly publicized anti-American demonstrations followed. In effect, the United States had handed Muslims around the world another grievance to hold against Americans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top