$$$$ Talks Again

  • Thread starter Thread starter HagiaSophia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HagiaSophia

Guest
"…During the hearings on this monster, French financier, the late Sir James Goldsmith, testified in front of Ernest Hollings committee. He demonstrated that GATT would gut the American textile market. The following are some quotes from the Washington Times, Dec. 6, 1993, which accurately reflect Sir Goldsmith’s statements during the hearings:

Global free trade will force the poor of the rich countries to subsidize the rich in poor countries. What GATT means is that our national wealth, accumulated over centuries, will be transferred from a developed country like Britain to developing countries like Communist China, now building its first oceangoing navy in 500 years. China, with its 1.2 billion people, three Indochinese states with 900 million, the former Soviet republics with some 300 million, and many more can supply skilled labor for a fraction of Western costs. Five dollars in Communist China is the equivalent of a $100 wage in Europe.

It is quite amazing that GATT is sowing the seeds for global social upheaval and that it is not even the subject of debate in America … If the masses understood the truth about GATT, there would be blood in the streets of many capitals. A healthy national economy has to produce a large part of its own needs. It cannot simply import what it needs and use its labor force to provide services for other countries. We have to rethink from top to bottom why we have elevated global free trade to the status of sacred cow, or moral dogma. It is a fatally flawed concept that will impoverish and destabilize the industrialized world while cruelly ravaging the Third World…"

wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44965
 
HagiaSophia said:
"…During the hearings on this monster, French financier, the late Sir James Goldsmith, testified in front of Ernest Hollings committee. He demonstrated that GATT would gut the American textile market. The following are some quotes from the Washington Times, Dec. 6, 1993, which accurately reflect Sir Goldsmith’s statements during the hearings:

Global free trade will force the poor of the rich countries to subsidize the rich in poor countries. What GATT means is that our national wealth, accumulated over centuries, will be transferred from a developed country like Britain to developing countries like Communist China, now building its first oceangoing navy in 500 years. China, with its 1.2 billion people, three Indochinese states with 900 million, the former Soviet republics with some 300 million, and many more can supply skilled labor for a fraction of Western costs. Five dollars in Communist China is the equivalent of a $100 wage in Europe.

It is quite amazing that GATT is sowing the seeds for global social upheaval and that it is not even the subject of debate in America … If the masses understood the truth about GATT, there would be blood in the streets of many capitals. A healthy national economy has to produce a large part of its own needs. It cannot simply import what it needs and use its labor force to provide services for other countries. We have to rethink from top to bottom why we have elevated global free trade to the status of sacred cow, or moral dogma. It is a fatally flawed concept that will impoverish and destabilize the industrialized world while cruelly ravaging the Third World…"

wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44965

Ahh… the immortal (except he’s dead now) James Goldsmith, Corporate Raider extraordinaire. Anglo-French (that’s one hell of a start!!) famous for ammassing a fortune by buying companies experiencing difficulties, selling off the assets (why try to save them if you can just sell them!!) and putting all the people formely employed, into the greater market known as the unemployed.

Now isn’t that a wonderful man to take any form of moral stance?:rolleyes:
 
40.png
walstan:
Now isn’t that a wonderful man to take any form of moral stance?:rolleyes:
I see this quotation as more of a practical stance than a moral one. What he predicted did happen. America’s once thriving textile industry is almost totally gone thanks to cheap imports from Guatemala, Mexico, Indonesia, Pakistan, India, China and one country I wouldn’t believe if I hadn’t seen the label in the shirt - Switzerland. Only carpet manufacturing remains strong. The only domestic testile products I have been able to find are sheets and towels and, if I look long enough and get lucky, socks.
 
40.png
walstan:
Now isn’t that a wonderful man to take any form of moral stance?:rolleyes:
Even a stopped watch is correct twice a day and “ad hominum” as it always does, fails to address the issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top