T
Theo520
Guest
As I recall, it was a money loser for USPS.Trump has already cost the USPS business with Amazon
Some deals are better lost.
As I recall, it was a money loser for USPS.Trump has already cost the USPS business with Amazon
Interesting question since European and Japanese consumers pay more for their food products than Americans do, and trade barriers are the reason for it. There’s no mystery to it. They do it to preserve the livelihoods of their own farmers. But their consumers certainly pay the price.nobody can say why it is good for consumers to pay higher prices.
The sad thing about it is that it is the poor and the middle class who are the hardest hit from these policies. I would argue that if the goal was to redistribute income from households to farmers, the tax code would be a better place to do it. At least it would require us to be open and up front about it.Interesting question since European and Japanese consumers pay more for their food products than Americans do, and trade barriers are the reason for it. There’s no mystery to it. They do it to preserve the livelihoods of their own farmers. But their consumers certainly pay the price.
That is a common problem with developed countries, for some reason they all want to subsidize agriculture in some way or another.Of course, American farm products (other than beef) are subsidized by the government, so the U.S. is doing something we complain about when others do it.