F
Freddy
Guest
Evolution doesn’t deny God. It simply explains how He created what we now have.…that evolutionists so need, to avoid God.
Evolution doesn’t deny God. It simply explains how He created what we now have.…that evolutionists so need, to avoid God.
OK. It came from God. A couple were given a soul by God and became fully human. As were their offspring from that point onwards.Evolution claims to be able to explain the origin of human beings.
The defining aspect of a human being is the immortal, rational soul. This separates humans from animals. You cannot have a human person, without a soul.
Evolution claims it knows how human beings evolved. So, supposedly, the human soul evolved from matter. But that would be false, because we know by infallible Catholic doctrine that God creates every human soul - so evolution is false.
A human being cannot emerge from blind, mindless process like evolution since the soul cannot be created from a mindless entity, It must come from God.
Can you reference this in the scientific literature that talks about the origin of human life? Everything i have seen says human beings evolved from non-human ancestors through mutations and selection. There is nothing about a soul - which is the rational intelligence in a human being.A couple were given a soul by God and became fully human. As were their offspring from that point onwards.
Where’s the problem?
Why does it need to be direct creation? Are you saying that God couldn’t have done it by guiding the evolutionary process? Are you restricting God’s abilities?Freddy:
Can you reference this in the scientific literature that talks about the origin of human life? Everything i have seen says human beings evolved from non-human ancestors through mutations and selection. There is nothing about a soul - which is the rational intelligence in a human being.A couple were given a soul by God and became fully human. As were their offspring from that point onwards.
Where’s the problem?
So, how can you explain the origin of humans, without God’s direct creation?
De fide Catholic doctrine.Why does it need to be direct creation?
It’s not part of the Catholic faith. It doesn’t teach creationism. In fact, the church accepts the evolutionary process.
The Catholic Church does not teach the specifics of creation. It does not hold that the genesis story is a form of science. I’m wondering why you do?Both of their religion class teachers promote and believe the evolution story instead of God’s 6 day creation.
This does not fit well in a science class because it infers a designer to “fill the gaps” & who is not subject to any further scientific investigation.Intelligent Design is a much better scientific explanation for what we observe. These teachers and schools should get current.
If a population becomes physically separated into 2 populations (places) experiencing different environmental conditions, and so each population evolves independently, and differently, what is the information loss that concerns you and Which you say must lead to extinction?Speciation is lineage splitting with a subsequent loss of reproductive ability with the former. This lineage splitting leads to eventual extinction as the information loss is not regained.
That says nothing about what we were talking about. Which was creationism. The church doesn’t teach it. That it teaches that God creates every spiritual soul doesn’t contradict anything I’ve said either.As I said, de fide dogma. “De Fide” means “of the Faith” - it is required of all Catholics. If you deny it you are a heretic.
Humani Generis: the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God
Catechism - 366 The Church teaches that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God
So they are granted by God. Yet again, are you saying that God couldn’t have given these things to the first two humans?Consciousness, self-awareness, power of abstract thought, logical processing by reason, free will, moral awareness in conscience - these are aspects of the soul. It does not emerge from evolution.
As I said, those who denigrate the process seem not to know the basics. Critical thinking would require one to have accurate knowledge in the first instance. You can’t compare one process with another if you don’t understand one of them.Encourage critical thinking in your kids. IMO, the idea that purely random processes…
Science has observed a different form of creation in action. I accept some see that as a series of colossal mistakes and others may see it as a conspiracy or “fake news”.And that is the issue. We agree He could have created just as Genesis states.
Scientism has done its best to deny this possibility.
Requested the scientific literature to support your evolutionary story here.Are you saying that God couldn’t have given two people souls thus creating the first two true humans?
I told you. Science doesn’t consider the soul. It’s a religious concept. As is God granting it to the first two humans. Again, are you saying that God could not have done that?Freddy:
Requested the scientific literature to support your evolutionary story here.Are you saying that God couldn’t have given two people souls thus creating the first two true humans?