S
STT
Guest
I completely agree with you. That as I mentioned is necessary considering the fact that the most astonishing experiences also cannot last forever.It has to be more than merely “long lasting,” precisely because we get tired of things after a time. So, primarily, meaning has to be all-encompassing or answers every possible question and eventuality – ties everything together, so to speak – before it is made to go on forever.
To me meaning is something which we gain at the end of our quest.Well, it seems to me that meaning must be a “quest” in the sense that if it isn’t something that we hold at this moment, it must be “obtained” in some sense by a “movement” of some kind towards it. That movement may be a change about or within us, but that still requires that something – even if that “something” is ourselves – changes.
I don’t understand you here. Could you please elaborate in plain English?If you have true meaning, then nothing need change. If you don’t then, apparently, something has to – unless you have predetermined that meaning itself is inconsequential, but that seems self-contradictory: i.e., it is a self-refuting claim that meaning is meaningless.