E.g. (not only) in the so-called west young women are potrayed, respectivly viewed, as (merely) physically desirable (by many males), with self- ond socially pressured mutilations (part of which are arguably many contemporary cosmetics), ‘having sex’ is not enough to many (in various aspects, a combo of greed and lust), and a cheated-on wife has been degraded and feels also so when aware of it (which arguably is better than living a false marital romance).
Besides enviromental factors (which partially includes social aspects such as not also unintentionally enticing perverts from afar) outpointed earlier, another side is humiliation. Sure, what feels as humiliating and what constitutes as humiliating may be very different things. So or so, regardless of whether “treatment” of women (in Islamic countries) is seen as systematic humiliation or not, when women are “treated” equally then it leaves little* to no room for individual humiliation (*considering that extramarital sex is, not only, by Islam minimally frowned upon) as in individual women being treated differently male-based on how a woman appears, or for any particular discrimination for that matter (especially with a full body and face veil, hard to exactly tell age, skin, or if it isn’t a guy).
Nevertheless, (mandatory) full face veil makes it rather difficult for women as persons to be able to take part in out of family community life. And another side being that of (emotional effects of) eventual partner mishandling staying kind of hidden, especially in times and places of where shopping happens in large stores, of laundry at home, etc. Regarding extreme demonic cases, I am certainly no fan of a state where every registered family’s, or individual’s, food intake would be measured (except as in food rationing situations), but I do think that something in the lines of a timely-random large-scale curfew search and rescue operation would help to liberate trapped ones.
Back to a few things in this thread about though,
Judaism, Christianity and Islam have a long (common) history, with good and bad times. In the 6th century A.D. e.g. in Yemen, Dhu Nuwas, a Himyarite king, changed the state religion to Judaism and began persecution of Christians, which was followed by an invasion and annexiation by Kaleb, Christian king of Aksum, with encouragement of the Byzantine Emperor Justin I.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia#Kingdom_of_Himyar_.282nd_century_BCE_.E2.80.93_525_CE.29
The mentioned persecution of Christians may have been a ‘revenge’ thing regarding particular persecution of Jews in the Roman Empire pre-313 and afterwards - not excusing this or that.
Furthermore, in particular regarding the 7th century A.D., (in that area) there was the Byzantine Empire and the Sassanid Empire, with various kinds of fighting and wars. Roughly, in some aspects Muhammed could be compared with Qin Shi Huang, though technically the Rashidun Caliphate wasn’t created until after the death of Muhammed and “caliphate” as “representation of the political unity of the Muslim Ummah” and theoretically as “aristocratic-constitutional republic” bound by constitutional and religious law, sounds per se more as being kingdom than empire.
In particular regarding the Constitution of Medina:
“The Constitution established: the security of the community, religious freedoms, the role of Medina as a haram or sacred place (barring all violence and weapons), the security of women, stable tribal relations within Medina, a tax system for supporting the community in time of conflict, parameters for exogenous political alliances, a system for granting protection of individuals, a judicial system for resolving disputes, and also regulated the paying of blood money (the payment between families or tribes for the slaying of an individual in lieu of lex talionis).”
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Medina
That said, it isn’t as if there would be no room for proper improvement anywhere, but a lot of the bashing, overally on various sites, comes off, in better cases, as nagging or as stupid marital arguing, or, in worse cases, as propagandas similar to the ones nazis used in Germany in the 1930s (and earlier), and I seriously doubt it is in any way or shape helping anyone truly oppressed, but admittedly, at least personally, if any insult hurler has an issue with eventual wife or female relative of mine, I would prefer to have these insults hurled at me, and wearing light clothing in public makes malicious dirt throwers more likely to target me than someone in dark clothing, doesn’t it?
. I would like to explain it as erotic humiliation to women.
