Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest

Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor​

‘Democrats took every avenue possible to commit fraud in this election,’ eye witness claimed

Mon Dec 7, 2020 - 10:08 am EST

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Mellissa Carone and Rudy Giuliani during last week’s Michigan House Oversight Committee voter fraud hearing The Sun / YouTube

By Raymond Wolfe

LANSING, Michigan, December 7, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) –A contractor for Dominion Voting Systems has testified that she witnessed systematic ballot fraud in Detroit that led to tens of thousands of false votes in last month’s presidential election.

Mellissa Carone, an IT and cybersecurity specialist, told members of the Michigan House

Oversight Committee at a voter fraud hearing, “Democrats took every avenue possible to commit fraud in this election.”

Carone worked at Detroit’s TCF Center on Election Day and the day after, where she said that she had observed “at least 30,000” ballots counted more than once. “What I saw on [November 3 and 4] was over 20 counts of fraud being taken place in front of my face,” Carone stated. . . .

 
Just gonna say years ago while driving through Detroit I saw a huge billboard during the election for governor. It said “If Snyder wins you lose your health care.”

I don’t think Biden needed to steal votes in Detroit.
 
Seriously… even Rudy realized they jumped the shark with her! He was trying to get her to shut-up!
 
@Cathoholic , that witness is not credible. I don’t want to go into the sordid details of her past, but, seriously, this is over. No need to post these already-refuted stories.
 
Know who she reminded me of when she did her acting gig?
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
She is the real life version of Rita Skeeter
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Given that Biden won Michigan with a majority of over 150,000, it’s going to take more than this (even if true) to overturn the election result. Indeed, even if Biden were to lose Michigan at this stage, he’d still have 290 electoral college votes. It may be best at this stage to admit that Trump lost.
 
EmilyAlexandra said:
Given that Biden won Michigan with a majority of over 150,000, it’s going to take more than this (even if true) to overturn the election result. Indeed, even if Biden were to lose Michigan at this stage, he’d still have 290 electoral college votes.
Click to expand...
This still needs to be looked at and investigated thoroughly.

Am I the only one here (yes there are a few others too) who can see implications for elections in the future as a whole?

And that regardless of the “winner” here, this needs immediate follow-up in DETAIL so this never happens again in our country??

We need to learn from our mistakes including our election mistakes.
 
Last edited:
I think what needs to be looked into is why the president of the United States is claiming that there was electoral fraud when there is seemingly no credible evidence for it.
 
I wonder if she gave her testimony before or after meeting with her probation officer.
 
sleepysam said:
I wonder if she gave her testimony before or after meeting with her probation officer.
Click to expand...
I wonder why anyone with a “probation officer” is allowed to count votes in any capacity at all.

Thank you for showing flaws in their vote count system in MI.
 
sleepysam said:
I wonder if she gave her testimony before or after meeting with her probation officer.
Click to expand...
Here is her mugshots
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Mellissa Carone Was Recently On Probation | Law & Crime (lawandcrime.com)

A judge previously decided Carone’s election accounts were “not credible.”

According to reports by the Daily Mail and Deadline Detroit, Carone’s appearance alongside Giuliani came after she appeared in court to face two criminal charges. The named defendant on court documents referenced in those reports is Mellissa Anne Wright , which the reports say was Carone’s former name. According to case records on file with the 28th Judicial District in Southgate, Mich., which Law&Crime reviewed, the original charges were first-degree obscenity and using a computer to commit a crime. Court records indicate both were misdemeanors. The records say the obscenity count was reduced to a count of disorderly circumstances warranting alarm; the computer crime count was dismissed by the prosecutor.
 
Last edited:
EmilyAlexandra said:
president of the United States is claiming that there was electoral fraud when there is seemingly no credible evidence for it.
Click to expand...
Remember, he was claiming this months before the election, when polls were showing he was losing.

Like he said there was fraud in 2016 which was why he lost the popular vote but his commission found no fraud.

Like when he said Cruz beat him in Iowa because Cruz cheated.

Like when he’s said…
 
Last edited:
sleepysam said:
I wonder if she gave her testimony before or after meeting with her probation officer.
Click to expand...
I wonder if she gave it before or after stopping at the bar on the corner. She sounded inebriated and unhinged.
 
Cathoholic said:
Am I the only one here (yes there are a few others too) who can see implications for elections in the future as a whole?
Click to expand...
I think this is very important, but I cannot imagine any “implications for elections in the future.”

There is no evidence of any wrongdoing that can be corrected. So the only thing that can happen is increased suspicion of however the votes are counted. That does not seem like a good thing.

Votes were counted by the methods established by each of the states. Every state probably audited the votes so that they have a high degree of probability that they have selected the correct candidate as the winner,

If someone got around those safeguards in this election, then that should be corrected for the next election. That can only be done with more evidence so that we can know what to correct. What can we do with what we know now?

Prevent machine suppliers from hiring goofy tech people?
Not elect people with a history of contesting facts?
Disbar lawyers who file frivolous lawsuits?

None of those seem like good solutions to me, let alone something I would want written into the law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top