This is called “bolting the door after the steed has been stolen.”
Where was the concern when this filth’s illegitimate parent, “Twilight”, was being shilled as acceptable reading for young women?
Remember kids, the devil works by degrees.
Well, I read the first 3
Twilight books and skimmed the 4th one before deciding I’d have enough of them. And if you’re claiming
Twilight itself is porn, I’d disagree with you.
But if your point is that
Twilight shows a seriously unhealthy, borderline abusive relationship, I’d agree with that.
I do recall some in the Christian community finding
Twilight to be acceptable because “at least the couple abstain until marriage” or “the 4th book sends a pro-life message”. However, I think this is only true on the surface. The couple doesn’t have actual sex until the wedding night but they do sleep in the same bed many times.
(As do the couple in the
Hunger Games and it does seem this idea of “chaste co-sleeping” or at least “chaste cohabitation” is more popular than before among young people and I do find this to be problematic.)
And as for the “pro-life” message, Bella starts out befriending the “good” vampires who abstain from killing humans, but finds the “evil” vampires who do feed on humans to be, well, evil. But in the last book she happily allies with them in order to protect people she loves, apparently not caring about other humans she knows her new “friends” prey upon as a matter of course.
The idea seemed to be that the worth of humans is all relative. If the vampires want to protect them and/or turn them into fellow vampires, then they’re very valuable. But if they don’t, it’s fine to see them only as a food source. This seems very close to the idea that the worth of an unborn baby is relative to whether the mother wants the baby or not.
So yes,
Twilight is problematic in many ways but I wouldn’t say it’s equivalent to *50 Shades *even if the author was inspired by Twilight.
I don’t think anyone is claiming
50 Shades is appropriate for young people, though. AFAIK most women who read it were the same type of middle-aged housewife who more “vanilla” romance novels have been traditionally marketed to.