Texas Gov. Rick Perry Entering 2012 Race

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
True, but the WSJ is certainly several orders of magnitude better than Drudge or Breitbart, and such. Same goes for the NYT. At least it’s news, not like the Huffington Post.

You’re right, it is best to read all sides. But perhaps second best to not to bother to read the news at all.
Or if you have to watch TV, then watch C-Span and try to figure out what the heck they’re talking about on the floors of the House and Senate. That said, there seems to be more civility on the Senate floor. (C-Span2)
 
Liberals think this because so many posters repeat the exact same talking points that are statistically impossible to make up on one’s own.

So often I hear the word of the week. Last week it was the "sowing seeds"reference What are the odds of so many people using this phrase on the Sunday morning shows?

You, at least, express your personal opinion and i respect that. NPR is a somewhat balanced source for news.
I have not noticed that you make outragious comments that have no basis in reality.
So you watch Fox and listen to Rush and then come here to see if anyone repeats what you’ve heard?
 
Or if you have to watch TV, then watch C-Span and try to figure out what the heck they’re talking about on the floors of the House and Senate. That said, there seems to be more civility on the Senate floor. (C-Span2)
Of course the most exciting time to watch C-Span is on Sunday nights (I think this is still the case, haven’t watched in a while) because that’s when they show the British parliament, which is much more exciting because they’re allowed to insult each other on the floor. I personally think they should show the South Korean parliament occasionally though, 'cause that seems to occasionally devolve into a brawl. I bet if the American senators and congressment had a good rumble every once in awhile a lot more people would be interested in politics.
 
So you watch Fox and listen to Rush and then come here to see if anyone repeats what you’ve heard?
Hey, I used to watch Glen Beck regularly. I have trouble sleeping often so sometimes I’d be up around 3 in the morning when they used to rerun his show on weekdays. It was the most entertaining thing on at that hour (though I don’t think he intended it to be funny, though for me it was better than Comedy Central), certainly more amusing than bowflex infomercials and whatnot. So I was POed when he lost his show; what am I gonna watch when i can’t sleep on a wednesday night? 🤷
 
Of course the most exciting time to watch C-Span is on Sunday nights (I think this is still the case, haven’t watched in a while) because that’s when they show the British parliament, which is much more exciting because they’re allowed to insult each other on the floor. I personally think they should show the South Korean parliament occasionally though, 'cause that seems to occasionally devolve into a brawl. I bet if the American senators and congressment had a good rumble every once in awhile a lot more people would be interested in politics.
Senators and Representatives are generally not allowed to speak in the second person. I’ll have to listen carefully next time I watch Parliament, that is, when they’re not throwing pies at those they’re interrogating.
 
Hey, I used to watch Glen Beck regularly. I have trouble sleeping often so sometimes I’d be up around 3 in the morning when they used to rerun his show on weekdays. It was the most entertaining thing on at that hour (though I don’t think he intended it to be funny, though for me it was better than Comedy Central), certainly more amusing than bowflex infomercials and whatnot. So I was POed when he lost his show; what am I gonna watch when i can’t sleep on a wednesday night? 🤷
I think I watched a total of one of Glenn Beck’s shows if you accumulate the amount of time I spent listening to bits and pieces of it. Same for his radio show, the longest bit I ever listened to on there was when he had the comedian that does all the impersonations really well on it.
 
Liberals think this because so many posters repeat the exact same talking points that are statistically impossible to make up on one’s own.

So often I hear the word of the week. Last week it was the "sowing seeds"reference What are the odds of so many people using this phrase on the Sunday morning shows?

You, at least, express your personal opinion and i respect that. NPR is a somewhat balanced source for news.
I have not noticed that you make outragious comments that have no basis in reality.
Well, maybe if the liberals stopped getting their talking points from HuffPo, the Democratic Underground, and Moveon.org, and listened to actual news instead, then maybe the political discourse in this country would be more civil.

Generalizations are a heck of a thing, aren’t they?
 
So you watch Fox and listen to Rush and then come here to see if anyone repeats what you’ve heard?
I don’t have cable and I am at work while Rush is on the radio. 🤷

I guess that means I come up with my positions independently.

I subscribe or listen to:

The Wall Street Journal
Heritage Foundation
CATO Institute
Mises Institute
Gerald Celente
Jim Rogers
Al Cresta and his guests
Mother Angelica
David Ramsey

Among various other things.
 
So you watch Fox and listen to Rush and then come here to see if anyone repeats what you’ve heard?
:whacky:

I don’t even know what “sowing seeds” means. Maybe he’s confusing CAF with another Forum?

As for Sunday mornings, I’m usually in Church. I don’t allow any TV or news before noon.
 
Well, maybe if the liberals stopped getting their talking points from HuffPo, the Democratic Underground, and Moveon.org, and listened to actual news instead, then maybe the political discourse in this country would be more civil.

Generalizations are a heck of a thing, aren’t they?
You forgot Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart.
 
Liberals think this because so many posters repeat the exact same talking points that are statistically impossible to make up on one’s own.

So often I hear the word of the week. Last week it was the "sowing seeds"reference What are the odds of so many people using this phrase on the Sunday morning shows?

You, at least, express your personal opinion and i respect that. NPR is a somewhat balanced source for news.
I have not noticed that you make outragious comments that have no basis in reality.
Here are some buzz words I hear from the left:
  • There is a CONSENSUS of scientists
  • It’s SETTLED law
  • You can’t be pro-life and pro death penalty.
  • Pro lifers only care about the baby before it’s born
  • Conservatives are immoral because they oppose government help for the poor
  • Same sex “marriage”
The left has a bad habit of forcing their own definitions on the rest of us.

And no, NPR is not balanced. It presents it’s stories on premises I don’t agree with. They at least keep me on my toes. 👍
 
If you get your news from jon Stewart, you have bigger problems than civil discourse. 😃
But, he is funny. Did you see the post-Iowa-straw-poll he did about the media ignoring Ron Paul? It was funny…and sad in it’s accuracy.
 
Texas Governor Rick Perry, who entered the GOP presidential race less than two weeks ago, is the latest Republican presidential candidate to sign a pro-life pledge put forward by the Susan B. Anthony List on abortion and judges.

The pledge has the candidates promising to support only judicial nominees who won’t interpret the Constitution in a way that supports Roe v. Wade, select pro-life Cabinet members on positions affecting abortion policy, supporting legislation to stop taxpayer funding of abortions and Planned Parenthood, and to support a fetal pain bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

“I not only pledge to protect unborn life, but have a record of doing so in Texas,” Perry said in signing the pledge. “I have signed legislation requiring parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion, and have long advocated adoption as an alternative to abortion in order to protect unborn children.”

lifenews.com/2011/08/24/rick-perry-signs-pro-life-pledge-on-abortion-judges/

Most of the Republican hopefuls signed the pledge earlier in the campaign. However, Romney balked, as has Herman Cain (who has flatly refused to sign pledges at all), Gary Johnson, and Jon Huntsman. Romney objects to the third clause, which defunds all entities that perform or fund abortions, claiming that the policy would harm hospitals and would have “unintended consequences.” The current legislation proposed in Congress on which this clause is based does not defund hospitals, however. Romney has emphasized his pro-life positions in this campaign, most notably in his own pro-life pledge at National Review.

hotair.com/archives/2011/08/24/perry-signs-pro-life-pledge/
 
This guy gets better by the day:thumbsup:

Note who else signed, and who “declined to do so” (from the same article sited by the OP)
Perry joins Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Thad McCotter, and Newt Gingrich in signing the pledge. Governor Tim Pawlenty signed the pledge as well before dropping out of the Republican presidential race**. Though they are running on pro-life platforms, Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, Gary Johnson, and Jon Huntsman declined to sign the pledge**.
 
But, he is funny. Did you see the post-Iowa-straw-poll he did about the media ignoring Ron Paul? It was funny…and sad in it’s accuracy.
I think I may have been the first person on these forums to post the link to Stewart’s coverage of the media’s lack of coverage…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top