M
Mr.Ex_Nihilo
Guest
You’ve often ridiculed people for not agreeing with you, insisting that anyone with “half-a-brain” should be able to understand you-- and that’s just the beginning.RIDICULOUS! Mr. Ex Nihilo, it’s evident that if it doesn’t suit or you read what you like then you dismiss it as absurd. There isn’t anything to debate. I’ve provided resources and you have failed to give me anything but rude remarks. FYI, in the future address our exchanges rather than fabricating something that doesn’t exist. I wasn’t name calling anyone. Observations are part of science.And science is truth.
You’ve also effectively called into question the faith of anyone who disagrees with you wildleafblower, and have many times given the innuendo that anyone who doesn’t agree with you simply doesn’t love Jesus.
Furthermore, whenever the conversion goes against what you claim, you don’t actually respond to what we’ve said and instead just post quotes and links to other sites which do not actually address our questions.
Finally, as a last resort, instead of actually addressing our questions, you attempt to label us as “panentheists” instead of actually reading what we’re saying.
I’m sorry, but I find your posts to be demeaning and often highly presumptuous as to what we actually believe without adding anything meaningful to the discussion and debate. Your posts are sometimes meaningless in their lack of context to be honest.
It’s one thing to question the methods by which someone arrives at their conclusions in their faith-- searching for where one might arrive at faulty conclusions in their theodicy of God. It’s entirely another thing to call into the question the very faith which they espouse to uphold and claim that they don’t actually believe in anything which the Church actually teaches.
If you don’t like our thoughts then you need to address them more clearly and give us a fair chance to respond to what you actually claimed against us without projecting your own pre-conceived notions as to what we’re actually saying. Anything else is highly ignorant in my opinion. And I’m stating this quite clearly to you personally so that you can personally address these things more clearly without piling up more quotes and links that add nothing to the discussion.
Do you understand this?
FYI, I haven’t had a problem with being understood in the past years, it’s being clear to me that you just don’t like the evidence (links and quotes). My observation is that when you don’t get your way, you resort to insult.
And, I’ve become completely bored by your role of a dictator and instructor. I’m a grown adult who thinks for myself so I don’t need you as a role model. Also be aware, I’m not questioning anyone’s Faith system. I must admit though that I have noticed your level of comprehension is minimal to say the least. You tend to skip around. And I repeat, “Mr. Ex Nihilo, Coyne is talking about COSMOLOGY which has nothing to do with the Eurcharist!” Futhermore, your harsh remarks are absolutely absurd. I can’t be bothered with such. I detest someone who acts as the Ruler of a topic and instructs me as you have how I MUST proceed in my exchanges with others. Let them speak. Don’t butt in. Remember, YOU ARE NOT THE MODERATOR, YOU ARE NOT THE LORD AND MASTER, YOU ARE NOT GOD, and YOU ARE NOT MY CARETAKER of my every exchange with other people. I haven’t judged anyone yet you have judged me. 
You’re an angel. Notice Peter dodges my message 389? 
Wonder why he doesn’t wish to “engage”?