E
Ed_Rand
Guest
If the antichrist tries to get us to eat bowling balls, I’d say he doesn’t have much of a chance!
Looking at your signature guess its a good thing the lion wasn’t vegan or rome may not have fallenIf the antichrist tries to get us to eat bowling balls, I’d say he doesn’t have much of a chance!
Looking at your signature guess its a good thing the lion wasn’t vegan or rome may not have fallen
this one is a biggie to me as well.…] **With all the hunger in the world, it is hard no to feel guilty in the most abundant, rich society in the world. I have no doubt that abstaining from all sorts of things because of faith is always good. **
The part of that passage that I find really interesting is that these people preach this false asceticism because of “branded consciences”. What does that mean? I have a feeling that it means that these people would have forsaken important parts of the faith, and, knowing this to be wrong, they attempt to make up for their transgressions by preaching asceticism in other areas. The liberal movement is full of guilt. I know, I am a liberal on so many issues. It is a righteous guilt it many ways. However, many liberals are “hypocrites and liars”, because they project that guilt out without ever looking in. They’ll condemn the wars, condemn the gluttony of their society, fight for animal rights, put their lives on the line to save a tree etc. etc., but when it comes to the parts of their personal lives that don’t line up with Biblical principles… Oh no! Don’t criticize them you bigot!
Example: The liberal, moralizing, vegan who lives in sexual sin and would refuse and even mock all Church teachings in regard to sexuality.
Example: The President elect whose outlook on the state of the U.S. and the world and whose concern for the poor I really tend to agree with who then turns around and says that he doesn’t want his daughter “punished with a baby” for making a mistake.
“The fruit of abortion is nuclear war”–Mother Theresa
This says to me that the liberals in the U.S. need to understand that their failures are intimately related to the failures of the selfish, “I am not my brother’s keeper” war-hawk conservatives.
i didn’t understand “branded consciences” eitherAlso, I think you would agree that the same non-Biblical reasons that some people preach vegetarianism will also be used to preach abortion as a solution.
Of course, the debate occurs when trying to reach agreement about what is meant by ‘disordered use’. For me, keeping animals in ways in which they become sick, aggressive to one another, and experience suffering is disordered use. Keeping animals in as a natural environment as possible - for example Chickens that can roam, roost and engage in normal behaviour - is one way of showing our respect for ‘the particular goodness’ of that creature. For that reason I don’t eat battery farmed chickens or eggs. As I said earlier I’d rather eat less meat and eggs than participate in a system that is abusive and disrespectful of God’s creation.…Each of the various creatures, willed in its own being, reflects in its own way a ray of God’s infinite wisdom and goodness. Man must therefore respect the particular goodness of every creature, to avoid any disordered use of things which would be in contempt of the Creator and would bring disastrous consequences for human beings and their environment. CCC: 339
well saidI’m not advocating the widespread or permanent adoption of vegetarianism or veganism. There are many associated beliefs and practices that are not Catholic teaching and are often in direct contrast to it. However, what many Catholics do not realise is that our own Catechism speaks of the requirement to care for the environment and animals within the context of our Faith
Intensive farming and the industrial approach to raising, keeping and butchering farm animals for meat in which animals are routinely abused is not in keeping with Catholicism. The Catechism states this very clearly:
Of course, the debate occurs when trying to reach agreement about what is meant by ‘disordered use’. For me, keeping animals in ways in which they become sick, aggressive to one another, and experience suffering is disordered use. Keeping animals in as a natural environment as possible - for example Chickens that can roam, roost and engage in normal behaviour - is one way of showing our respect for ‘the particular goodness’ of that creature. For that reason I don’t eat battery farmed chickens or eggs. As I said earlier I’d rather eat less meat and eggs than participate in a system that is abusive and disrespectful of God’s creation.
In doing so I express part of my identity as a faithful Catholic.
I’m sure that if you captured a vegan, put him in a cage and starved him like those poor lions, he would eat Christians too!Looking at your signature guess its a good thing the lion wasn’t vegan or rome may not have fallen
as long as the Christian wasn’t cooked first!!!I’m sure that if you captured a vegan, put him in a cage and starved him like those poor lions, he would eat Christians too!
I’m sure that if you captured a vegan, put him in a cage and starved him like those poor lions, he would eat Christians too!
Well, the only Christian I wanna Eat is The body and blood of Jesus himself.as long as the Christian wasn’t cooked first!!!
i hear they taste like vealI’m sure that if you captured a vegan, put him in a cage and starved him like those poor lions, he would eat Christians too!
you guys are making me ill…i hear they taste like veal![]()
I like that part in the movie Alive where they’re stranded in the Andes after a plane crash and they have a meeting to decide who is okay with being eaten after they die. One of the men says “Sure, but if you eat me, you’d better clean your plates!”you guys are making me ill…![]()
Well.I’m not sure if cannibalism is being a good steward or not.But,in the spirit of being humorous I’ll state that a Vegan would taste better because they are organic.I like that part in the movie Alive where they’re stranded in the Andes after a plane crash and they have a meeting to decide who is okay with being eaten after they die. One of the men says “Sure, but if you eat me, you’d better clean your plates!”
As is, the seven deadly sins (jog my memory please, weren’t they the ‘Vices’?) cover every sin there is, as do the Ten Commandments, as do those Two commandments Our Lord gave us.Most of these are already grave sins - you surely don’t think pedophilia, drug dealing or abortion only just became sinful recently?
It’s a figure of speech.I know that Jesus was technically a Jew.But,if you really want to get nit-picky,…well,…Jesus is also his own father.(it’s a trinitarian thing).So,I guess He would also be a child of Himself.To That one guy, while I agree that the only flesh I desire to consume is that of Our Lord, does He count as a Christian? After all, doesn’t Christian mean “Child of Christ”?
If you notice, no one from the Vatican, Pope included said anything remotely resembling “new seven deadly sins”. It’s the media putting words in their mouth.I googled “Pope Benedict 7 new deadly sins”… there are actually quite a few news stories about this. The following link is just one of the results.
cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/03/13/new.sins/index.html
and this makes the issues that ARE referred to unimportant because…If you notice, no one from the Vatican, Pope included said anything remotely resembling “new seven deadly sins”. It’s the media putting words in their mouth.
By the way,Alphonsus, Thanks for the link.Very cool.If you notice, no one from the Vatican, Pope included said anything remotely resembling “new seven deadly sins”. It’s the media putting words in their mouth.
In his L’Osservatore interview, Girotti said pollution and genetic engineering, as well as drug dealing, abortion, pedophilia, social injustice and extreme wealth were now on record as mortal sins, those the Church deems most offensive to God and those that could land you a spot in hell without repentance.
Don’t Miss
Code:* Vatican official suggests new list of 'deadly sins'
“In different times, in moments of history, cultural moments, technological moments, sins dress themselves up, so to speak, in a different way,” the Rev. John Wauck from Rome’s Pontifical University of the Holy Cross told CNN.
“The underlying sin tends to be the same – a variation of a theme of selfishness, a lack of respect for others, of lying, cheating , stealing or killing,” Wauck said.
In the modern age, people find new ways to commit the seven deadly sins.
Suddenly,with Papa ‘Ratzi’ at the helm,The Church seems to be moving forward in the direction usually associated with hippies and neo-pagans and new agers.“Our wrath has new outlets and we have new technology with which to deceive people or even kill people,” Wauck said.
FRIDAY, Dec. 26 (HealthDay News) – Global climate change may lead to a rise in health problems due to increased exposure to harmful air pollutants, suggest researchers who reviewed studies projecting the impact of climate change on air quality.
The review authors also concluded that reducing greenhouse gas emissions could help reduce the harmful effects of climate change.
The review looked at how climate change will affect ground-level ozone, a known pulmonary irritant that affects the respiratory mucous membranes, other lung tissues, and respiratory function. Exposure to elevated levels of ozone is associated with increased hospital admissions for asthma, allergic rhinitis, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other respiratory diseases.
I’m not trying to be an alarmist.But,things are happening.As Christians it is important that we get more active in environmental action.We have been told to take care of our planet.“Projections suggest that climate change will increase concentrations of tropospheric ozone, at least in high-income countries, when precursor emissions are held constant, which would increase morbidity and mortality,” wrote review authors Kristie L. Ebi and Glenn McGregor. “The potential impact of climate change on ozone concentrations have not been projected for low-income countries, many of which currently have significantly higher ozone exposures.”
“The sins of today have a social resonance as well as an individual one,” said Girotti. “In effect, it is more important than ever to pay attention to your sins.”
Girotti said the new sins were intended “as a corollary of the unstoppable process of globalisation”.
“You offend God not only by stealing, blaspheming or coveting your neighbour’s wife, but also by ruining the environment, carrying out morally debatable scientific experiments, or allowing genetic manipulations that alter DNA or compromise embryos,” said Girotti.
Mortal sins are a very serious business, according to Roman Catholic doctrine. They represent a “grave violation of God’s law” leading to “eternal death” if unrepented by the act of confession.
Meanwhile, in the US the politically influential Southern Baptist church, an often staunch critic of climate change science and green campaigners, has signalled that it could shift its stance on the environment after a group of 40 leading figures within the church issued a declaration claiming that it had been “too timid” in its response to climate change and as a result is seen around the world as being “uncaring, reckless and ill-informed”.
The developments further underline the growing moral pressure being placed on billions of consumers worldwide to embrace greener and more sustainable lifestyles.