Nice try, but that is not an “article,” it is just propaganda from the SSPX’s own leader.
Same here. Liberalism is just way to scary. Amzing how you can be a young liberal to growing up conservative lol.I am praying and supporting for the conservative
And, that’s it? You just claim that it’s “propaganda”, and that the case is closed? How about saying what is not true about it, and maybe provide some reasons?
It’s still a news article whether you like it or not, and a fairly well researched one from the looks of it. So if you’re going to claim its propoganda you’re going to have come out with some convincing reasons why, otherwise its just another ad hominem attack to add to the rather long list the SSPX and all other conservative catholics have had to put with over the years
Its like once you are touched by traditionalism, you can’t let go
You are obviously looking at something totally different. The so-called “article” is, as its title even admits, “Bishop Fellay’s sermon given during the ceremony of the ordinations, in Winona (USA).” Only to the most unquestioning Lefebvroid lemming could a propaganda sermon conceivably be termed a “news article” – so doubtless you just clicked on some other link and were looking at actual news when you mistakenly typed the above.It’s still a news article whether you like it or not, and a fairly well researched one from the looks of it. So if you’re going to claim its propoganda you’re going to have come out with some convincing reasons why, otherwise its just another ad hominem attack to add to the rather long list the SSPX and all other conservative catholics have had to put with over the years
I suppose by that standard we should call all sermons which are reported in newsarticles as propoganda? I wonder if you would be so willing to brand cardinals or bishops sermons as propoganda, should we perhaps brand the holy fathers as propoganda as well? As for lefebvroid, lefebvreites etc… No such type of people exist I’m afraid
It is not an article in any way, shape, or form. I don’t know how you can possibly maintain this claim with any shred of honesty. It is just the text of his sermon, and nothing else, spreading the false, anti-Roman claims of this dioceseless pretender bishop’s splinter sect.
Who exactly do you think you’re helping here? Yourself? Others? Do you somehow think your diatribe is helping the cause of the truth? It’s a new article on a website which contains the text of his sermon in common parlance its a news article, if you don’t like the society or bishop Williamson go start a bashing thread.
But isn’t true there are mixed messages from Rome?
In evaluating anything, you must be aware of the biases. So YES he is helping. Do you think your outburst helps? In coommon parlance? Not in my circle would it be considered news
However what your post indicates is someone who is irritated that his view point is being questioned.
I don’t see there being a mixed message
Anyone who could read the page would be aware of bias one way or the other, to say something is bias and something is propoganda is not the same thing. As for an uncharitable answer, I’ve yet to be uncharitable so far as I can see, perhaps you should be careful lest you commit the sin of presumption though?In evaluating anything, you must be aware of the biases. So YES he is helping. Do you think your outburst helps? In coommon parlance? Not in my circle would it be considered news
Now I wll go duck as I probaly will get the same uncharitable answer.
“If you are not liberal when you are young, you have no heart, and if you are not conservative when you are old, you have no brain”.
