The beautiful monsters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hokomai
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They are merely organisms that are adapted to their environment. Any beauty we see is merely our own pathetic desire to add significance to something totally unaware of us.

😛
 
They are merely organisms that are adapted to their environment. Any beauty we see is merely our own pathetic desire to add significance to something totally unaware of us. 😛
Indeed they are organisms adapted to their environment and to each other, as jellyfish are actually colonies of smaller animals. I do not think we have discussed the concept of beauty before, although if I infer your motorcycle preferences correctly we may agree about that, with a slight Norton tendency on my part. But back to the jellyfish and beauty. While there are cultural difference about beauty, and fashion shows that humans with can change their perception of beauty rapidly, there appears to be some hard-wiring of beauty perception in our make-up. We share some of this with other species, just as we seem to find similar infants appealing. Symmetry is one area on which I have read studies, and the movements of jellyfish are an extreme example of this. The theist critique of science as believing things are ‘random’ because no one designed or initiated them misses the depth and complexity of science, and the observable fact that you do not need to believe in God to think these pics show great beauty, and to anticipate, correctly, that others will share your view. Also jellyfish are a lot quieter than a Triumph. Or anything!

Spooky! I just realized this was post 1,666 for me. What could this mean?
 
So are you saying there is some kind of “objective” beauty? Aren’t those dangerous waters for an atheist?

I agree with your Norton preference: I love bikes where form and function and engineering design are so lean and minimal.

I think there is an objective beauty for motorbikes.



(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

http://static.driven.urbandaddy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/bonvinc1.jpg

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Wonderfully made tools, instruments and vehicles do have a very satisfying beauty.
 
And you can sense how we are made in the Image and Likeness of God too through our desire to create “fearfully and wonderfully made” objects (Ps 139:14).
 
I knew this post was unwise! I know jellyfish will not enter into heaven, being unclean and not having immortal souls and all, but is it possible really good people will be able to take their guitars and bikes? If so, will ukeleles and Harleys be allowed?🙂
 
Harleys don’t belong in heaven - and sorry biker bad *****es - they don’t belong in Hell either!😛

Telecasters belong in heaven though as do Les Pauls!👍

And if you want some jellyfish there Hokomai then they will be there;)
 
They are merely organisms that are adapted to their environment. Any beauty we see is merely our own pathetic desire to add significance to something totally unaware of us.

😛
That’s one theory.
OR God built beauty into the universe and gifted us with the ability to recognise it. If you had a child who stopped and said, “Daddy, look!” pointing at the sunset would you go into a lecture about how it’s caused by pollution and particulate matter or look and appreciate yourself?

Last, if we didn’t appreciate the beauty of nature (e.g. jellyfish) we couldn’t make works of art like, uh, motorcycles.

My go to source for God’s handiwork; Astronomy Picture of the Day.
 
http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon1.gif Re: The beautiful monsters
Quote:
Originally Posted by triumphguy forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_khaki/viewpost.gif
*They are merely organisms that are adapted to their environment. Any beauty we see is merely our own pathetic desire to add significance to something totally unaware of us.

:p*

That’s one theory.
OR God built beauty into the universe and gifted us with the ability to recognise it. If you had a child who stopped and said, “Daddy, look!” pointing at the sunset would you go into a lecture about how it’s caused by pollution and particulate matter or look and appreciate yourself?

Last, if we didn’t appreciate the beauty of nature (e.g. jellyfish) we couldn’t make works of art like, uh, motorcycles.

My go to source for God’s handiwork; Astronomy Picture of the Day.

Didymus Triumphguy is on your side. He was getting at me (in a nice way I think). The relationship between our appreciation of the aesthetics of jellyfish and a Norton Commando (or one of those great celestial things NASA shares with us) gets into the heart of what makes us human, and the extent to which scientific wonder, aesthetic appreciation, and belief overlap, or perhaps (in my humble opinion) possibly the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top