H
Holly3278
Guest
Yes, the Bible is definitely a Catholic book. Everything in the Bible, in one way or another, supports Catholicism.
Hello Joysong,Of course you would!The thread title was loaded with bait towards them and left little doubt as to your intention.
ANOTHER slanted question by Jimmy B. Define Catholic in terms of your question for starters.The Bible is a “Catholic Book”, therefore, everything in the Bible, in one way or another supports Catholicism.
Ignorance of Catholicism is ignorance of the Bible.
Your thoughts?
Another non-response…ANOTHER slanted question by Jimmy B. Define Catholic in terms of your question for starters.
So you cannot even define a word in your own question? That surely shows your slant of the question, you have no intentions for genuine answers. now do you? Why ask the question, just say what you want to say and be done with it. SO can you define your own question or not?Another non-response…
Hello thecoach,So you cannot even define a word in your own question? That surely shows your slant of the question, you have no intentions for genuine answers. now do you? Why ask the question, just say what you want to say and be done with it. SO can you define your own question or not?
the Bible a “Catholic Book”, and does everything in the Bible, in one way or another support Catholicism? Finally, Is Ignorance of Catholicism, ignorance of the Bible?
Thank you for your post.…The Bible is a Jewish book plus a Christian book.
STILL cant define catholic in terms of your question…you do know there is more than one possible intended meaning, right? True answers and truth are found on the outside of it when you are free of externals and controls.Hello thecoach,
Is that better? Honestly, their sure seems to be many Protestants today (in general) who just love to argue everything semantically; to try to answer all questions with a handful of Bible verses or a sentence or two and to comment on the “messenger” rather than the message; or comment on how a question here is brought-up or asked, rather than answer the question…now why is that?
Is it because, there are no true answers outside of Catholicism, only cases where others have merely tried to copy, re-invent, repeat, re-word, agree with or argue something, which was already “Catholic”?
Flawed or incomplete copies, maybe?
Thank you for your post.
Doesnt necessariy make the OT “catholic” though, now does it? Whatver yuor definition of the term may be.Thank you for your post.
Does your answer here imply that the Old Testament does not, ALL, in one way or another, point towards Jesus Christ? Isn’t that why the Old Testament was included, in with the New Testament and along with the rest of the books, which make-up the Bible?
Peace
I get it…you cannot…thanks for showing us all.Lol…:extrahappy:
I can’t help it, but there are times when I get the biggest laugh here.![]()
No, I’m sure there are plenty here who get a good laugh at my expense…I get it…you cannot…thanks for showing us all.
Ah. nothing like false humility when cornered by logic!No, I’m sure there are plenty here who get a good laugh at my expense…
Peace![]()
Good one.Ah. nothing like false humility when cornered by logic!
can’t stop laughing, you made my dayI am beginning to wonder if Bible is even the proper word to use for the Protestent versions. As they had to take certain books out just to begin to make their version make sense.
So I think “Bble” is more accurate for Protestent version discussions.
But back to the OP, since Protestents use a different “Bble” than Catholics, I would definately say the BIBLE is a Catholic book.
seems like ignorance to me… Tell the Jews their OT canon is wrong, after all, it was their Scriptures before ours. Their canon is missing those books too, so…can’t stop laughing, you made my day![]()
Ah, thank you for a definition. NOw is that the one that Jimmy means or not?Since “Catholic” mean universal - I guess it’s for everyone!