The blessed Virgin and Traditionalism generally-speaking

  • Thread starter Thread starter GloriousOrder
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lately, I have been starting my prayers with, “Mary, present me to your son Jesus Christ that I may speak with him.”
I think this is precisely the sort of prayer that TrueLight, myself, and people akin to us are bothered by. Our Lord said He came in order that we may know “Him Who sent me”, and that He would direct us to the same: the Father. Every time I start reading the Gospels, I get the distinct impression that Jesus wants us to come to Him and talk to Him directly without inhibitions, fears, or proxies. Of course we must pray for one another and ask intercession… but each person, in private prayer, should go to Christ first: not ask permission from His mother to see Him, right?

Just to be clear, we do not wish to wreck the spiritual lives of others by our questions! We just want to find out reasons to do things ourselves: what the Church says, and what our brothers and sisters say. Reason and logic are cornerstones of our holy religion, so why not? 😉 Perhaps our questions help the more faithful people understand why they do what they do, day after day? Your answers certainly help us understand ourselves. Our bothering about this is just to understand others… not condemn! 🙂
the Gate to Jesus, and to a closer relationship with God, could be Mary. She is together with Jesus. We still go to the Father through Him.

We go through the Church too.

🙂
I’m happy that you said “could” be, since all the saints are gateways to Christ, through their holiness and their undying prayers in eternity! It’s just that St. Mary “gets more” prayers than St. Dominic. No one calls St. Ignatius Loyola the Magistrate of Heaven, or St. Francis the Duke of Heaven, you know? All the saints are together with Jesus, and I think blessed Mary is greatly pleased by dispensing with all the titles and poems in her honour; judging by her presentation in the Gospels, I dare say she’d be shy about such honour given her, even if it does lead to God in a roundabout way. :o

We go through the Church because we are the Church! 😃
 
I think this is precisely the sort of prayer that TrueLight, myself, and people akin to us are bothered by. Our Lord said He came in order that we may know “Him Who sent me”, and that He would direct us to the same: the Father. Every time I start reading the Gospels, I get the distinct impression that Jesus wants us to come to Him and talk to Him directly without inhibitions, fears, or proxies. Of course we must pray for one another and ask intercession… but each person, in private prayer, should go to Christ first: not ask permission from His mother to see Him, right?
I can only speak for myself.

I am not worthy to approach such a king, he through whom the whole universe was created and is held in existence. The rocks don’t sin but I sin, and so even the rocks in my backyard have more merit before God than I. And so I ask permission from my Mother and your Mother the Queen to enter the King’s throne room. And Mary’s will is perfectly conformed to God’s will. What she asks for, Jesus grants her, because she does not ask for anything which is not according to God’s will. Mary asks Jesus if I may enter, introduces me, and grants me an audience with her son. What’s better than that?

And I don’t see why anyone would be bothered about the way I or anyone else prays when kneeling in adoration. That anxiety is coming from somewhere. Perhaps it bothers you because you are resisting?

-Tim-
 
** “Honor Thy Blessed Mother Mary”**.
**“For behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed”—Luke 1:48 **
The purpose of this group is to honor our Blessed Mother who being the Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ was also given to us by Christ Himself while on the cross; “When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, “Woman, behold, your son.” Then he said to the disciple, “Behold, your mother.” And from that hour the disciple took her into his home”—John 19:26-27. We as Christians are obligated to follow Gods commandments and are therefore obligated by the 4th commandment to honor our Blessed Mother; **“Honour thy father and thy mother”-- Exodus 20:12. **
We as Christians should be happy though to honor our Blessed Mother because her “soul doth magnify the Lord.”—Luke 1:48, and by honoring her we glorify God and proclaim His greatness!** “In every nation which shall hear thy name, the God of Israel shall be magnified on occasion of thee”—Judith 13:31**. We should also be happy to honor our Blessed Mother my dear friends in Christ because honoring her is also beneficial for our wellbeing and perfection!** “I am the mother of fair love, and of fear, and of knowledge, and of holy hope.”—Sirach 24:24**, and “In me is all grace of the way and of truth, in me is all hope of life and of virtue”—Sirach 24:25.** “So now, O children, listen to me; instruction and wisdom do not reject! Happy are those who keep my ways, watching daily at my gates. For he who finds me finds life, and wins favor from the Lord.”—Prov 8:32-35!**
“Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee”—Luke 1:28 “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb, Jesus.”—Luke 1:42, “Blessed are thou, O daughter, by the Lord the most high God, and above all women upon earth. For he has so magnified thy name this day, that thy praise shall not depart out of the mouth of men”—Judith 13:23-25
This was taken from a group’s description on CAF. I just wanted to share it because I think it illustrates that the devotion to Mary is Biblical since Mary is prefigured by the righteous women of the Old Testament.

God Bless
 
Sorry to cut the rest off, but this seems to be the most important part (for me).

The fact that the blessed Virgin is greatest in the Hierarchy of Grace, beyond even the angels, is indisputable. Such a holy and humble woman not only deserves such a place for the trials she went through in life, but merits it eternally by her prayers. Seeking to imitate her holiness and to follow her, however, is not the same as praying to her, ontologically-speaking.

“Hail, Holy Queen” and “Hail Mary” are directed to she who is already directed toward God. Why don’t we just take her example and direct ourselves toward God proximately? I’m referring to personal prayers here, not the liturgy (of course). TrueLight quoted the relevant verses from St. John’s Gospel. Our Lord never mentioned anyone to pray to except the Father, through the Son, and in the Holy Spirit.

If Marian devotion were so crucial, why isn’t it even hinted at in the Bible? “Do whatever He tells you” is an injunction to the servants, so that His first public miracle might proceed. Our Lady is present at the Crucifixion, Ascension, and Pentecost, but she is accorded no special place by the words; yes, she is given as Mother to all who would become beloved disciples, but that doesn’t mean we must petition her constantly. I tend to think she is most pleased when we say “blessed Mary, pray for me”, and then direct everything else to God. 🙂

I mean to criticise no person’s faith here. This is my own set of inquiries into a matter which give me pause. Excuse a neophyte who is still more Protestant in mindset than anything else… 😊
Well, of course. It is hard to come round to a concept that seems strange.

But why are you harping on the Bible? The Catholic Church existed for 3 1/2 CENTURIES before the canon of the Bible. The original Christians had ORAL teachings (many of which are preserved in Sacred Tradition). . .the Bible is not stand-alone the only authority and it never claims to be. Jesus did not institute a Bible but a Church, And NONE of the Marian teachings contradict the Bible in any way. Plus there is always Revelation which arguably does contain Marian teachings as well as the Old Testament foreshadowings of the Ark of the Covenant and the stories of Judith and Esther etc.

What you really need–and it’s hard --is to get over the idea of ‘either-or’, as though EITHER you may ‘speak directly to God’ OR you speak to Mary and the saints ‘instead of’. That’s Not what happens. Mary and the saints are united to Christ in a way beyond our capability to understand --they are ‘part’ of Him. so for you to say that you’re going to speak to God ‘only’ but not the saints is like saying you’re going to speak to your friend Robert, but only to his eyes and not to ANY part of the rest of him. . . Does that help you to understand? Mary and the saints are not God but they are joined to God and anything that they ‘do’ is done solely through the will of God. . .who sent Christ to us THROUGH Mary and doesn’t ‘stop’ doing so. . .just as Christ sacrificed Himself on the Cross once but doesn’t ‘stop’ doing so. . .
 
To be fair, Irenaeus of Lyons defines the Biblical Canon around A.D. 160 (in “Against Heresies”) so it most certainly wasn’t around for three and a half centuries in mere oral form. He very purposefully and critically condemns those who refuse to accept the four Gospels and Epistles he says had been accepted for many years already.

I go to the Bible so often and “harp” on it because it’s the early Church’s first and most perfect expression of doctrine and history. 🙂
 
To be fair, Irenaeus of Lyons defines the Biblical Canon around A.D. 160 (in “Against Heresies”) so it most certainly wasn’t around for three and a half centuries in mere oral form. He very purposefully and critically condemns those who refuse to accept the four Gospels and Epistles he says had been accepted for many years already.

I go to the Bible so often and “harp” on it because it’s the early Church’s first and most perfect expression of doctrine and history. 🙂
Well then, let’s look at what St. Irenaeus has to say about Mary in Adversus Haereses:
Mary, though she also had a husband, was still a virgin, and by obeying, she became the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race.
And a little further down:
The knot of Eve’s disobedience was untied by Mary’s obedience. What Eve bound through her unbelief, Mary loosed by her faith.
Both are from Adversus Haereses 3:22. So clearly, such belief about Mary does go back to the very early church, and if someone as early and prominent as Irenaeus can call Mary “the cause of salvation for the whole human race” (and no other authors ever picked on him for it), then that belief, that type of language, must be consistent with the apostolic preaching. This is even stronger language than calling her a gate!
 
So many of the Apostles students who become the second generation Bishops spoke on the Blessed Mother. Really its just a matter of research.
Defining Doctrine just continued, St. Athanasius, St. Basil, St. Gregory of Nyssa, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, Proclus of Constantinople, St. Justin, Tertullian. The list continues from then, till now. And the then is 100-AD. The art we have today dates to the 2nd century. The Black Madonna is believed to have be painted during the life of Our Lady.

When you study the Saints all of them hold the BVM in the highest regard. The Exorcists invoke the BVM and insist She is most powerful in the battle of evil.

All the Catholic Mystics point to the Blessed Mother’s intercession. Not one fails to mention Her. St.Teresa of Avila also mentions St Joseph. St Catherine Laboure, St Catherine of Sienna all gifted all seen the Blessed Mother. St Faustina and on and on. Fatima has already produced one Blessed and the actual Seer will be a Saint. Another who speaks of Christ the BVM and St Joseph, St Bernadette of Lourdes. There’s no end.

You can start the study of the BVM today and this time next year you still won’t be finished. 2500 Biographys, the most venerated woman in the Arts. It just goes on and on. And of course Christ is even more vast with information.

Your not grasping the complexity of your simple questions. For thousands of years scholars have devoted their life researching the BVM.

And of course theirs the approved apparitions. which if not amazing enough their result attributed to the consecration and converstion of not one but two countries. In Mexico Catholics were Baptized day through night for 9 years straight to total 10-million Catholics in an area the Catholic missions simply could not convert with any success. In one day the BVM completely changed its history. You don’t have to believe in the apparitions, believe in the facts of Austria, Portugal, Mexico.

Peace
 
And of course theirs the approved apparitions. which if not amazing enough their result attributed to the consecration and converstion of not one but two countries. In Mexico Catholics were Baptized day through night for 9 years straight to total 10-million Catholics in an area the Catholic missions simply could not convert with any success. In one day the BVM completely changed its history. You don’t have to believe in the apparitions, believe in the facts of Austria, Portugal, Mexico.

Peace
I would think that if anyone saw apparitions of Jesus, whole countries would be converted too.
 
It may seem odd, but remember that there are three persons in one God. It is a profound mystery. However, we pray to the Father through the Son because that is what Jesus told us to do. Jesus’ mediation with the Father and the intercession of Mary with her Son are not comparable. Praying to Jesus through Mary is optional, we can approach Him on our own. However, we cannot approach the Father on our own–we need the mediation of Christ. Without the mediation of Christ before the Father, we would not be able to achieve salvation. That is how God Himself set it up.
Fair enough 🙂
 
I would think that if anyone saw apparitions of Jesus, whole countries would be converted too.
You would think, huh? But that is not what happened when He made an actual appearance on Earth and worked miracles and healed people before their very eyes. They put Him to death. I doubt things would be any different today.😦
 
Chesterton said in an essay that what attracted him about the Catholic Church was its ability to inform. Each day, he said, offered the hope of believing in something new, in contrast with Protestantism or secular ideas, which always seem to be decaying into reduced versions of themselves.

By way of example, he said he personally never felt the great veneration for virginity that marks the C.C. But, he said, the delightful thing is knowing that any day he might wake up and say “Aha! Now I see!”

I think that Chesterton has his finger on the pulse of the Catholic mindset - do not fret about not following all the Church’s thinking: there is just too much of it for one mortal to master. Rather, cultivate the power of suspending judgement while continuing with your own thoughts and beliefs that are consistent with sound doctrine.

Not only does this keep one safely “in the fold” (so to speak), it is, as GK said, rather good fun.

Cheers!
I love this way of thinking- makes me want to read more Chesterton. Any suggestions on where to start? I especially like the part about cultivating the power of suspending judgement. Thanks for a gret post. :)
 
You would think, huh? But that is not what happened when He made an actual appearance on Earth and worked miracles and healed people before their very eyes. They put Him to death. I doubt things would be any different today.😦
Jesus was supposed to die. That was the plan.

In any case, I don’t have a problem with anyone who feels they have to go through Mary to get to Jesus. I do have a problem with any implication that going to Jesus directly is a matter of pride or lack of reverence for Christ, or that it’s not Catholic. I’m not saying that’s what anyone specifically said in the thread but I have heard it before online and offline.

Like I said, this is something I will either grow in or I won’t.

And that’s all I’m going to say. 🙂
 
I would think that if anyone saw apparitions of Jesus, whole countries would be converted too.
They have, though this isn’t the point of what I was conveying, nor was it the topic. As they have seen the BVM they have seen Christ also.

Some one talked about a 62 Missal, look to the back of that Missal and read on the Saints.
 
I condemn no one, I love you all my brothers and sisters. You keep openly condemning yourselves, though! 😛 Self-effacement only goes so far until it makes no sense.
I am not worthy to approach such a king, he through whom the whole universe was created and is held in existence.
You are worthy to approach such a King. Look at the Collect for the Feast of Christ the King, 1962:

“Almighty and everlasting God, Who in Thy beloved Son, the King of the whole world, hast willed to restore all things, mercifully grant that all the families of nations now kept apart by the wound of sin, may be brought under the sweet yoke of His rule: Who with Thee liveth and reigneth.”

Now, you may object that this is just for the priest to say, but it is a human prayer nonetheless. Many CAF members are holier than some priests, I’m sure, and they could say this prayer with ease. We can all say it, because Christ’s holy incarnation, nativity, and advent unto us has cleansed humanity. The divine was united fully to the human: not only in Christ, but in a way that lifted humanity up out of the dregs we had plunged into! We are worthy to pray to the Father now because we’ve been justified by Christ! I think that’s what the Church teaches. We don’t strictly require Maria’s help to open the way to God.

I am opposed to this extreme devotion because it seems, to me, to be the beginnings of a misunderstanding of Christ’s redeeming mission. As haughty as it may sound of me: this attitude about our lowliness can lead to heresy, not believing Christ has ontologically changed the course of history. We’re not the ancient Jews; we’re baptised, in Christ, right?
The rocks don’t sin but I sin, and so even the rocks in my backyard have more merit before God than I. And so I ask permission from my Mother and your Mother the Queen to enter the King’s throne room. And Mary’s will is perfectly conformed to God’s will. What she asks for, Jesus grants her, because she does not ask for anything which is not according to God’s will. Mary asks Jesus if I may enter, introduces me, and grants me an audience with her son. What’s better than that?
The things you say about her can be applied to any of the saints. How is St. Francis not now perfectly conformed to God’s will? Ignatius does nothing and asks nothing that is out of accord with His majestic and noble rule. Any of the saints may do this. What we are to do, as earthly saints (as St. Paul calls us), is come to Christ directly, or perhaps allow Him to knock on the door? Revelation doesn’t say He’ll bring a welcoming party (though I would like to try the bl. Virgin’s cooking if He does bring her along at the End!!!)

Your contentions and hopes and dreams are good and righteous. I don’t want to destroy them or attack them…
And I don’t see why anyone would be bothered about the way I or anyone else prays when kneeling in adoration. That anxiety is coming from somewhere. Perhaps it bothers you because you are resisting?
Dear fellow! I’m not bothered by the way you or anyone else prays. My concern is the overall atmosphere of the devotion among and within the Body of Christ. Is it wrong to want to see right worship prevail, even if my idea is wrong? St. Thomas says the conscience that is incorrect, but still convicted of itself, cannot be considered evil when it does something wrong, because it did not know, and thought it was doing right. 😉 It doesn’t bother me because I’m resisting it; I’m resisting it because it bothers me.

I converted because of Jesus Christ alone, leading me to the Father in the Scriptures. I paid almost no attention to the bl. Virgin, except by thanking her in prayers for humbly allowing God a way into the world as Man. Beyond this, I was quite sure her role was over, and that was that. 🙂
…] So clearly, such belief about Mary does go back to the very early church, and if someone as early and prominent as Irenaeus can call Mary “the cause of salvation for the whole human race” (and no other authors ever picked on him for it), then that belief, that type of language, must be consistent with the apostolic preaching. This is even stronger language than calling her a gate!
I never said anything to the contrary. She is indeed the cause of our salvation, but that event was 2000 years ago. Perpetual virgin she is, ever the Mother of God, but the specific moment in which she gave God a man is passed. It happened in time, not in eternity (for humanity, anyway), and it is over. God is now man, incarnate for eternity, and that has something to do with our salvation as we enter the judgment hall.

My belief mirrors what Irenaeus said, but he was proving a point about Christ’s bodily reality and carnal nature in a book specifically directed to those who would deny such things. He says nothing more about devotion to or adoration of the blessed Virgin, even if it is implied (perhaps). 🙂
 
Jesus was supposed to die. That was the plan.
However, its not all that happened while Jesus lived. It was his hour as indicated at the wedding of cana
In any case, I don’t have a problem with anyone who feels they have to go through Mary to get to Jesus.
Until you open your mind you will because apparently you still do. NO-ONE feels they HAVE TO go to Our Lady to reach Christ. It is INTERCESSION. The “THEY HAVE TO” thinking is in your mind, its your illusion projected in error.

What you should say is, “what I don’t know, I don’t understand”, instead of what you don’t know, you don’t believe! Then create false senerios which is ego illusion.
I do have a problem with any implication that going to Jesus directly is a matter of pride or lack of reverence for Christ, or that it’s not Catholic.
No-one has told this. However it also seems to be a point you wish to argue. What I did tell you is I found it for “myself” and others around me being lazy, ego and image. Which I have witnessed the same in young boys/adults growing in Catholic School. What your case is? I have no idea, but there is an apparent issue. And what is Catholic is the Doctrines/Dogma of the Catholic Church. I know many souls who do not pray to Our Lady. However anyone of them will openly admit its a Blessing, and nothing to play with, if you can’t find it in yourself to believe or pray for Her intercession.
I’m not saying that’s what anyone specifically said in the thread but I have heard it before online and offline.
What you are saying in the thread is you chose to pray directly to the Trinity. And no-one has an issue with this. However the topic of the OP was not this but doubting questions which indicated a lack of knowledge and preceived, projection. Which no-one here was buying. Sorry about that. What you believe about Our Lady isn’t based on knowledge thus it isn’t truth, its just that simple, since truth is knowledge.
Like I said, this is something I will either grow in or I won’t.
Right, and if you maintain your current state of mind it will probly be later instead of sooner. However with the Blessed Mother who knows you may very well be praying to Her by next week. My personal suggestion is to research the Blessed Virgin Mother. Follow your path and leave others to their path.

Peace
 
I condemn no one
Condemn, no, the proper word is cirticize and Catholic Doctirne at that.
I am opposed to this extreme devotion because it seems, to me, to be the beginnings of a misunderstanding of Christ’s redeeming mission.
It has never led to heresy nor will it. It “is” Christs will to establish the Immaculate Heart of Mary thus is became His Churchs command to follow in obedience. The problem is “opposition” whhich indicates “rejection” of the Catholic Doctrine. You may disagree with Catholic Doctrine rejection is not an option my brother. Though I do undrstand you particular concern as to the response of that post.
The things you say about her can be applied to any of the saints. How is St. Francis not now perfectly conformed to God’s will? Ignatius does nothing and asks nothing that is out of accord with His majestic and noble rule. Any of the saints may do this. What we are to do, as earthly saints (as St. Paul calls us), is come to Christ directly, or perhaps allow Him to knock on the door? Revelation doesn’t say He’ll bring a welcoming party (though I would like to try the bl. Virgin’s cooking if He does bring her along at the End!!!)
This is not true. Our Lady in not merely Saint to be equated with all the other Saints this is your projection which you continue to emphasis.

Our Lady is the Queen of Heaven. She has been raised by God to a throne ABOVE the Saints and Angels. Her authority as Queen extends over the entire Human Race the communion of Saints and the Angels. This dignity is Hers not merely because of fullness of Grace and gifts, but above all because of Her Divine Motherhood and of Her part in the Redemption. She displays Her perogatives in Her unending intercession for Her Children and in the merciful Love which She shows all men and women including sinners.
Your contentions and hopes and dreams are good and righteous. I don’t want to destroy them or attack them…
I hear that,
Dear fellow! I’m not bothered by the way you or anyone else prays. My concern is the overall atmosphere of the devotion among and within the Body of Christ. Is it wrong to want to see right worship prevail, even if my idea is wrong? St. Thomas says the conscience that is incorrect, but still convicted of itself, cannot be considered evil when it does something wrong, because it did not know, and thought it was doing right. 😉 It doesn’t bother me because I’m resisting it; I’m resisting it because it bothers me.
Right, worship has prevailed and the CC is the only one thus far who has been directed in this regard. Listen Pope Pius declare’s the Immaculate Conception Doctrine. Within 4-years the Blessed Mother appears in Lourdes to an uneducated child and confirms the Popes doctrine by calling Herself the Immaculate Conception. The astounding truths of church just go on and on. Nothing evil brings Souls to Jesus Christ. The visions of Lourdes, and Fatima are victorys of Jesus and Our Lady. for it could be said that millions through these intercessions have given others to ability to regain the vision of God. Evil cannot nor would not do this. For what purpose the choice not to work for God has been made. St. Peter was the only Apostle whom Divine Providence confronted and instructed with specific instruction.
I paid almost no attention to the bl. Virgin, except by thanking her in prayers for humbly allowing God a way into the world as Man. Beyond this, I was quite sure her role was over, and that was that. 🙂
And we are quite sure you are wrong. And the Pope has specifically stated this in 2010 Light of the World you might want to read it. Our Lady is an essential part of Christianity. She figures in the Bible in Luke and John with astounding radiance and clarity. She has always been part of Christian life, and always will be. Her victorys though quiet are very real.
I never said anything to the contrary. She is indeed the cause of our salvation, but that event was 2000 years ago. Perpetual virgin she is, ever the Mother of God, but the specific moment in which she gave God a man is passed. It happened in time, not in eternity (for humanity, anyway), and it is over. God is now man, incarnate for eternity, and that has something to do with our salvation as we enter the judgment hall.
You are in eternity, time has nothing to do with Gods reality, its a learning tool for MAN. This is proven daily through the Mystics and the ability of the Holy Spirit to collapse time at His will. Souls do not cease to exist, this is contrary to Catholic teaching. You are reading 2000 year old events and assuming one has nothing to do with the other. The Transfiguration alone ought to show you the folly of this thinking.
My belief mirrors what Irenaeus said, but he was proving a point about Christ’s bodily reality and carnal nature in a book specifically directed to those who would deny such things. He says nothing more about devotion to or adoration of the blessed Virgin, even if it is implied (perhaps).
The Feasts to the Blessed Mother were part of eastern church by the 3rd century which St Athanius describes in his work, St Cyril of Alexandria defended the nature of Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mother at the Council of Ephesus and concluded Mary was TRULY THE MOTHER OF GOD. 431-AD. The fact Doctrine is further defined is exactly how Doctrine works. Doctrine is not a new concept, its continued during the writtings of scripture and since. There are those who would lead you to believe this is some novel Catholic idea. Another falacy.

Eternity is not over, and you are in it.
 
GaryTaylor, I appreciate your fanaticism and zealotry for this subject. It is nice to have a certain conviction behind things in our very ambivalent world.

I do not deny that Mary is the blessed Virgin or Mother of God. I suppose I’ve framed this entire topic in the wrong way. Traditional Catholicism, being what it is, composed Marian hymns that are still in use today. We can see that understanding the roots of Mariology requires an understanding of pre-Vatican II attitudes about prayer and Mary. You just don’t see an Alma Redemptoris Mater being written these days. At the very least, let’s admit that it is a very traditionalist thing to be devoted to Mary, and so fits T.C. well.

Clarification: My RCIA catechesis was poor. I’ve tried to look things up myself, but CAF is a better resource to test things I’ve learned against real people, who can criticise or affirm. I was never convinced that Catholicism is perfect in its doctrine and dogma. No one ever really pushed me over the edge into Papal Infallibility, for example, nor Marian devotion. I had to be baptised to alleviate the guilt of my sin and to affirm my love of Christ before I went mad, and the Catholic Church seemed least wrong. 😦 I do reject, interior-wise, several doctrines of the Church; whether it is more out of hubris or ignorance, I pray to find out and be corrected by Almighty God. Material heresy is no good…

Now, the broad concern I have is not with speaking to her, most excellent of the saints and most humble of human beings. In translation, the Church’s heart is revealed, and this traditional understanding is where my discomfort comes from. I was converted by models of Thomistic logic, who always emphasise that God alone is holy, merciful, and the Father of all people; given that, look at these: Alma Redemptoris asks Mary to “hear your people’s prayers”, and begs for “thy mercy” from her; Salve Regina calls her our life, sweetness, and hope; Ave Maris Stella asks her to loosen the chains of the guilty, send forth light, and dispel evil. These are petitions that are addressed to God alone in the Psalms. I find this a very conspicuous and, frankly, unnerving aspect of Catholicism; always have.
 
Sorry friend, but I am really uncomfortable with what you said here. It seems disrespectful and irreverent towards Christ.
It is not wrong to say what TrueLight said. Christ our Lord came to ontologically change humanity by His Incarnation, enlighten us by His ministry, save us by His death, and pull us up by His Resurrection. TrueLight just named one of the many tasks He came to perform, most truly. 🙂

FRIDAY MORNING:

“Almighty Father, it is truly righteous that we should, rising on this sorrowful day, offer repentance to You: holy and eternal God. He Whose arms You, wise and omnipotent, suffered to be spread across the breadth of the cruel tree, has preached justice in suffering, forgiven the evil in mercy, and bathed the wicked in His Blood. Therefore, while the sun rises on this crimson day, immolating the holy Lamb of God, we exult in penitential joy and beg your clemency on us, ever hoping in Your providence. With our brethren the Saints, with the silent Angels and Archangels, and with all the mourning spirits who fill the ranks of the celestial army, we shall honour the sacrifice of Your Son, humbly glorify Your sanctity, and surely proclaim Your Kingdom in the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord, through Whom You have redeemed the World.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top