The Book of Mormon

  • Thread starter Thread starter TexanKnight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
what is the point of this thread? Was it started just so catholics could ridicule somebody elses faith for their own satisfaction, if so it is pretty cheap. I am ex lds and catholic but I don’t know what you all are hoping to achieve, and I really thought you were above this.
 
what is the point of this thread? Was it started just so catholics could ridicule somebody elses faith for their own satisfaction, if so it is pretty cheap. I am ex lds and catholic but I don’t know what you all are hoping to achieve, and I really thought you were above this.
Its not to ridicule the lds. but to point out its inconsistences and not to let others fall for their lies.
 
But it hasn’t prompted any of them to discussion, it seems to me that this thread is ongoing for the sake of it rather than to achieve anything. If you really want mormons to get involved with this discussion why dont’t you post this thread on mormondialogue.com, you would certainly get a debate going there. It seems to me that this thread is taking side swipes from the safe position of this forum.
 
But it hasn’t prompted any of them to discussion, it seems to me that this thread is ongoing for the sake of it rather than to achieve anything. If you really want mormons to get involved with this discussion why dont’t you post this thread on mormondialogue.com, you would certainly get a debate going there. It seems to me that this thread is taking side swipes from the safe position of this forum.
This post was for lds posters but it seems that they wont/will respond. There are many more threads about the lds faith that they have posted on but when they cannot backup their claims with sound facts they tend to disappear for awhile or not answer the questions given to them. if you already havent, I would suggest reading the other threads about mormonism to see what im talking about. Its pretty lengthy but interesting. 🙂 And as far as mormon forums, a catholic gets banned faster than you can imagine if you say anything that they deem anti-mormon. Just ask these folks here about it.
 
I have posted on there and not been banned, and there are others who do also, and most of the replies have been gratious. It also seems that there is an aggressive side to these post that are not going to encourage interaction
 
We have tried to be nice but sometimes we forget ourselves and are mean.
 
But it hasn’t prompted any of them to discussion, it seems to me that this thread is ongoing for the sake of it rather than to achieve anything. If you really want mormons to get involved with this discussion why dont’t you post this thread on mormondialogue.com, you would certainly get a debate going there. It seems to me that this thread is taking side swipes from the safe position of this forum.
Let me help you out with a few things here.
  1. No, this thread isn’t to ridicule, bash, or anything else that you seem to perceive going on.
2… Humor on threads happens all of the time. There has been plenty of fun at Catholic expense as well.
  1. Our mormon posters are very good at giving as good as they get.
  2. it’s mormondialogue dot org, not com.
  3. Have you ever tried addressing these issues over there? There is very heavy handed moderation over there, and as soon as a mormon teaching is proven false by a non mormon, they are promptly banned.
 
This post was for lds posters but it seems that they wont/will respond. There are many more threads about the lds faith that they have posted on but when they cannot backup their claims with sound facts they tend to disappear for awhile or not answer the questions given to them. if you already havent, I would suggest reading the other threads about mormonism to see what im talking about. Its pretty lengthy but interesting. 🙂 And as far as mormon forums, a catholic gets banned faster than you can imagine if you say anything that they deem anti-mormon. Just ask these folks here about it.
Bingo!! We have a winner!!!
 
This thread is just religion bashing - newer religions don’t have the momentum built up over centuries that the older religions have and so will by definition have more perceived ‘holes’ in them - they are religions! Of course they have holes in them, they are made up by man and get polished by man until they have a perception of solidity, but they are still holes. Enjoy them for what they are, but no more than that. Let people form religions if they wish
 
Let me help you out with a few things here.
  1. No, this thread isn’t to ridicule, bash, or anything else that you seem to perceive going on.
2… Humor on threads happens all of the time. There has been plenty of fun at Catholic expense as well.
  1. Our mormon posters are very good at giving as good as they get.
  2. it’s mormondialogue dot org, not com.
  3. Have you ever tried addressing these issues over there? There is very heavy handed moderation over there, and as soon as a mormon teaching is proven false by a non mormon, they are promptly banned.
It comes across, when it is deliberately aimed to provoke a response from someone who has already bowed out of a previous thread, as aggressive, and also unnecessary when that individual continues not to engage. It runs the risk of making those who have continued this thread amongst themselves appear obsessed.
I have addressed some of these issues on their site, but with the exception of a few, they have replied without rancor or sarcasm, or ridicule.
And ridicule is not funny
 
It comes across, when it is deliberately aimed to provoke a response from someone who has already bowed out of a previous thread, as aggressive, and also unnecessary when that individual continues not to engage. It runs the risk of making those who have continued this thread amongst themselves appear obsessed.
I have addressed some of these issues on their site, but with the exception of a few, they have replied without rancor or sarcasm, or ridicule.
And ridicule is not funny
Are you referring to my Adam and Eve joke?

I was not poking fun at Mormons, but at the humid weather in KC.

Obsessed? Well, maybe just a little. 😃
 
what is the point of this thread? Was it started just so catholics could ridicule somebody elses faith for their own satisfaction, if so it is pretty cheap. I am ex lds and catholic but I don’t know what you all are hoping to achieve, and I really thought you were above this.
First, this is a DISCUSSION site. It was posted to discuss.

Second, on a different thread, a poster said he was not Catholic just because of the Book of Mormon. So this thread was started to discuss that and find out why.

If this type of stuff offends you, please refrain from reading it.

Thanks!
 
It comes across, when it is deliberately aimed to provoke a response from someone who has already bowed out of a previous thread, as aggressive, and also unnecessary when that individual continues not to engage. It runs the risk of making those who have continued this thread amongst themselves appear obsessed.
I have addressed some of these issues on their site, but with the exception of a few, they have replied without rancor or sarcasm, or ridicule.
And ridicule is not funny
Something you may not have picked up on is that many of the posters involved in these threads is that they were mormon at one time or another.

These former mormon posters are quite knowledgeable in what was taught in mormonism, and are also very well versed in their Catholic faith.

What you perceive as ridicule, sarcasm, etc. is what you are reading into it.

The tough love that is going on is just that. Tough Love. Hopefully forcing them to look at all of the holes in their so called theology.

Most people who leave mormonism, leave because they studied their way out. They studied so hard to defend it, that they found they were defending an illusion.

Pointing out the errors and contradictions gets these people to study. See the connection?

Remember also, that many of the posters on the mormon threads have been around quite a while, and have been posting quite a while. We have established friendships, relationships, and understanding of others posting style.

Another thing to remember is you cannot detect “tone” in the written word on a forum such as this. Something I may type/say in sensitive charity, make be taken as ripping someone’s head off.

I would also like to repeat. The moderation styles between the boards is totally different.
A free exchange (within reason) happens here at CAF. That same exchange at MADB is stifled by heavy moderation.

I have all the respect in the world for the moderation here at CAF. Eric has done a fantastic job cleaning things up in this forum. Trust me, I wouldn’t want that job.
 
This thread is just religion bashing - newer religions don’t have the momentum built up over centuries that the older religions have and so will by definition have more perceived ‘holes’ in them - they are religions! Of course they have holes in them, they are made up by man and get polished by man until they have a perception of solidity, but they are still holes. Enjoy them for what they are, but no more than that. Let people form religions if they wish
No…it is discussing. That what this board is.
 
First, this is a DISCUSSION site. It was posted to discuss.

Second, on a different thread, a poster said he was not Catholic just because of the Book of Mormon. So this thread was started to discuss that and find out why.

If this type of stuff offends you, please refrain from reading it.

Thanks!
👍👍

Point of clarification here.

He agreed with 95% of Catholicism, but couldn’t be Catholic unless the “Pope embraced the Book of Mormon”.
 
First, this is a DISCUSSION site. It was posted to discuss.

Second, on a different thread, a poster said he was not Catholic just because of the Book of Mormon. So this thread was started to discuss that and find out why.

If this type of stuff offends you, please refrain from reading it.

Thanks!
The point is that person did not choose to discuss nor say why. Instead the discussion became a pointless merry go round of side swipes, sarcasm and ridicule amongst those catholics who decided this discussion was for them, despite the fact that only one lds engaged at the begining. It is kind of pathetic and obsessive.
Incidentally I am not offended, just saddened.
Thanks
 
This thread is just religion bashing - newer religions don’t have the momentum built up over centuries that the older religions have and so will by definition have more perceived ‘holes’ in them - they are religions! Of course they have holes in them, they are made up by man and get polished by man until they have a perception of solidity, but they are still holes. Enjoy them for what they are, but no more than that. Let people form religions if they wish
Might I suggest you read up on the history of Joseph Smith and the beginnings of mormonism.

There are at least 9 versions of his “First Vision”.

His youngest polygamist bride was 14.

He put the moves on a 12 yr old daughter of a friend he was staying with.

He was a convicted con man

Telling the truth about something is not bashing.

Please research the difference between the two.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top