N
notsmart
Guest
Fisher, your last post is not telling anyone why they are wrong about anything.
I was just submiting a reply.Fisher, your last post is not telling anyone why they are wrong about anything.![]()
I know. I was just wondering who disputes anything in the bolded parts of your post? It seems when someone bolds portions of a post it is to highlight a specific point that is for the benefit of someone who lacks the information.I was just submiting a reply.
No thats not what I was doing sorry you took it that way.I know. I was just wondering who disputes anything in the bolded parts of your post? It seems when someone bolds portions of a post it is to highlight a specific point that is for the benefit of someone who lacks the information.
NO. it the way it is. 2000 years ago there was Christ and the Apostles. From there we have what since that time til today is the Catholic Church. All of the Protestant churches either come directly from rebellion against Her or from infighting and separation from each other. The only Christians that can be said not to fall into that would be the Orthodox as they to share in the Apostolic faith and succession from the very beginning.now THAT’S arrogance!
no, the thread title is correct, and it came from Jimmy himself! It was no rebellion, it was a demand to return to the truth.NO. it the way it is. 2000 years ago there was Christ and the Apostles. From there we have what since that time til today is the Catholic Church. All of the Protestant churches either come directly from rebellion against Her or from infighting and separation from each other. The only Christians that can be said not to fall into that would be the Orthodox as they to share in the Apostolic faith and succession from the very beginning.
where as there have been Popes and other bishops over the years that have made errors as is human to do, The Church itself can not error. there fore the tread title is incorrect the Catholic Church is not wrong and must continue to point out error made by others.
Do you mean doctrinally?no, the thread title is correct, and it came from Jimmy himself! It was no rebellion, it was a demand to return to the truth.
Now, there is something to this. However, the name used for Peter, Cephas or Kephas, is only derived from Kepha (Rock). Aramaic nouns are not gender specific. Had he called him stone, pebble, or Barney Rubble, it would have yeilded a new name.True Jesus spoke Aramaic, however, you dont know what He said in Aramaic, since the written document was in Greek.
Well said!!!Since the term “catholic” is actually a Greek term meaning “universal”, and since there is nowhere that I know of that Jesus said that the name of His church was going to be “the Roman Catholic Church”, I believe that Jesus established a church of Christians that would worship God in spirit and in truth. I don’t believe that one separates from the Body of Christ as long as they continue to believe in Christ and to follow his commands, and of course to ask for forgiveness when we make a mistake. I don’t believe that someone can be expelled from the Body of Christ if they believe in Jesus and follow his commands either.
I believe that some of the “protestants” ,and some of the “catholics”, and some of the “orthodox” make up the Body of Christ, but not everyone in any of the groups. I can discern this by their actions. Everyone that hates their brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life remaining in him.
Now, as far as taking Jesus’s words out of context, if we are going to assume that Jeus was refering to Peter as “The Rock” in Matthew 16:18, then we would have to assume Jesus also meant that Peter was actually Satan in Matthew 17:23. After reading Matthew, then reading 1 Corinthians 10:4, I get a clearer understanding of what Jesus was saying.
Dont get me started there…lolNow, there is something to this. However, the name used for Peter, Cephas or Kephas, is only derived from Kepha (Rock). Aramaic nouns are not gender specific. Had he called him stone, pebble, or Barney Rubble, it would have yeilded a new name.
UNless you want to accuse Catholics of altering scriptures…
Oh I understand His just fine, I just cant get over the errors in YOURS!Jesus talked in parables because people were stupid. sorry, but the people didn’t understand him, just like you don’t understand his interpretation of the Scriptures.
Yes, let’s get started. Show me where the Catholic church **actually altered the Scriptures **and I’ll show you where Luther wrote his version of the bible. Ready?Dont get me started there…lol
What would they be exactly?Oh I understand His just fine, I just cant get over the errors in YOURS!
you made the accusation first, perhaps you can tell me mine?What would they be exactly?
Go ahead, show me where Luther wrote his own. Your not going to use Rheims are you? You know, the one based on Jerome’s Vulgate, and not the original languages.Yes, let’s get started. Show me where the Catholic church **actually altered the Scriptures **and I’ll show you where Luther wrote his version of the bible. Ready?
I see. would that be Luther’s view of the truth or Calvin’s? Maybe it was the truth of Ulrich Zwingli or any number of others that came about 500 or so years ago and thought they had found the truth.no, the thread title is correct, and it came from Jimmy himself! It was no rebellion, it was a demand to return to the truth.
As a Protestant, if you don’t know what your own Reformer’s changed, what’s the point? You then don’t even know why you are “protesting” the Catholic church…good grief…Go ahead, show me where Luther wrote his own. Your not going to use Rheims are you? You know, the one based on Jerome’s Vulgate, and not the original languages.