P
pablope
Guest
Pablope,
So Stephen’s words “Lord, lay not this sin to their charge” was about the Jewish mob
Pablope,
So Stephen’s words “Lord, lay not this sin to their charge” was about the Jewish mob
My experience with someone I know that is Mormon was on the day of JS death. I believe that it was 06/27/11 that out of respect I asked this friend if this was a special day. He responded kindly and briefly. He said no. This was no celebratory day. He was shot. He is not considered to be a martyr. He is considered to be a Prophet. The conversation ended pleasantly and I learned something.Pablope, they came to murder him. White flag of surrender? He had already surrendered. He was in jail already, on a trumped up charge of “treason.” And the Carthage troops painted their faces black and came with the specific intent to murder him. There were bullets flying through the window, up the stairs, through the door … what you say isn’t feasible.
The pistol slowed down the mob, since there was narrow staircase leading from downstairs up to the room where JS and his friends were. If it were not for the pistol, then Willard Richards and John Taylor would almost certainly have been murdered as well.
“It is that JS death is being brandied as some kind of martyrdom”
Really? Who has done that here? I don’t see mormons pushing their views on JS’ martyrdom on others.
The actual date was 6/27/44.My experience with someone I know that is Mormon was on the day of JS death. I believe that it was 06/27/11 that out of respect I asked this friend if this was a special day. He responded kindly and briefly. He said no. This was no celebratory day. He was shot. He is not considered to be a martyr. He is considered to be a Prophet. The conversation ended pleasantly and I learned something.
The actual date was 06/27/44.My experience with someone I know that is Mormon was on the day of JS death. I believe that it was 06/27/11 that out of respect I asked this friend if this was a special day. He responded kindly and briefly. He said no. This was no celebratory day. He was shot. He is not considered to be a martyr. He is considered to be a Prophet. The conversation ended pleasantly and I learned something.
Pablope,They were not leaderless, Parker…Saul was there too. That mob would not have acted alone unless there was some approval from the Sanhedrin…or with the instigation of the Sanhedrin.
And you can see Stephen’s words…asking the sin not be held against the mob.
But the point is, these kind of words are not uttered by JS.
Joseph Smith was a prophet of the Lord. Two or three days before he died, “Joseph went to Carthage to deliver himself up to the pretended requirements of the law.” These are the words he uttered at that time:And you can see Stephen’s words…asking the sin not be held against the mob.
But the point is, these kind of words are not uttered by JS.
You’re right. We don’t focus on JS as a martyr, and to us the word “martyr” doesn’t have the powerful religious connotation that it has for you. In my life I’ve probably seen more non-LDS people talking about Mormons believing that JS was a martyr, than actual LDS people talking about him being a martyr.My experience with someone I know that is Mormon was on the day of JS death. I believe that it was 06/27/11 that out of respect I asked this friend if this was a special day. He responded kindly and briefly. He said no. This was no celebratory day. He was shot. He is not considered to be a martyr. He is considered to be a Prophet. The conversation ended pleasantly and I learned something.
I can definitely understand the sentiment given the assassination, but hearing my boys singing Praise to the Man in primary always gives me the willies, not because there’s anything inherently wrong with revering a martyr (there isn’t), but because my boys are singing the praises of Joseph Smith, who doesn’t merit reverence or veneration. I’d rather they venerated the Mother of God.You’re right. We don’t focus on JS as a martyr, and to us the word “martyr” doesn’t have the powerful religious connotation that it has for you. In my life I’ve probably seen more non-LDS people talking about Mormons believing that JS was a martyr, than actual LDS people talking about him being a martyr.
Most LDS folks don’t even know that JS died on June 27, let alone commemorating the day when it came up. If someone even proposed having a special commemorative day about it, folks would be uncomfortable with the idea, saying that would be like making an Easter for Joseph Smith, which we would see as idolatrous.
What we mean by “JS was a martyr” is that he was murdered, wrongfully, for what he believed in.
[the next bit does not address CopticChristian, but generally to the topic]
It does kind of astonish me that we can have a story where two hundred people paint their faces black, and storm into a building with specific intent of murdering a man, and then dismiss that as “died in a gunfight.” That construction seems profoundly malicious, more in the spirit of kicking over gravestones and defacing graveyards than actually saying anything meaningful about history. That’s like taking the incident at the temple, and saying that Jesus was executed for brawling. Yes, you can make the argument technically, but everyone’s just a little bit less intelligent for having read it.
You know, one really can’t be too careful to protect against idolatry. Hearing what you said, I think we really should change those lines “earth must atone for the blood of that man.” What the heck is that supposed to mean?I can definitely understand the sentiment given the assassination, but hearing my boys singing Praise to the Man in primary always gives me the willies, not because there’s anything inherently wrong with revering a martyr (there isn’t), but because my boys are singing the praises of Joseph Smith, who doesn’t merit reverence or veneration. I’d rather they venerated the Mother of God.
**Praise to the Man
Praise to the man who communed with Jehovah!
Jesus annointed that Prophet and Seer.
Blessed to open the last dispensation,
Kings shall extol him, and nations revere.
Chorus
Hail to the Prophet, ascended to heaven!
Traitors and tyrants now fight him in vain.
Mingling with Gods, he can plan for his brethren;
Death cannot conquer the hero again.
Praise to his mem’ry, he died as a martyr**;
Honored and blest be his ever great name!
Long shall his blood, which was shed by assasins,
Plead unto heav’n while the earth lauds his fame.
Chorus
Great is his glory and endless his priesthood.
Ever and ever the keys he will hold.
Faithful and true he will enter his kingdom,
Crowned in the midst of the prophets of old.
Chorus
Sacrifice brings forth the blessings of heaven;
Earth must atone for the blood of that man.
Wake up the world for the conflict of justice.
Millions shall know ‘Brother Joseph’ again.
Chorus
I am all for that, as Scriptures state “All generations shall call her Blessed”You know, one really can’t be too careful to protect against idolatry. Hearing what you said, I think we really should change those lines “earth must atone for the blood of that man.” What the heck is that supposed to mean?
I also agree with you that we could use a few hymns about Mary. But wouldn’t Catholics be offended if we appropriated a few of yours?
[www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiM9QVdJyVQ
Offended? Not at all, as long as they are Catholic. There is a question for you at the end of this.You know, one really can’t be too careful to protect against idolatry. Hearing what you said, I think we really should change those lines “earth must atone for the blood of that man.” What the heck is that supposed to mean?
I also agree with you that we could use a few hymns about Mary. But wouldn’t Catholics be offended if we appropriated a few of yours?
From [www.utahmission.com](www.utahmission.com)
I’ve also heard some mormons say this and I agree that it is nonsense. It’s also clearly contradicted by LDS apostles (most notably the sermons of Apostle Niel Maxwell) and by the Book of Mormon itself which talks about the importance of contemplating Christ’s sufferings.Encouraged by my wife and friends and one LDS women I have just started a blog about my experiences here in Northern Utah. Baptized Catholic 13 years ago I have had countless experiences with the LDS. One that happens often and really hits home is the LDS thinking that we as Catholics focus more on the death of Jesus than His Glorious resurrection. How do Mormons do it?
My priest who was born and raised in Utah once said that they distance themselves from the suffering Christ. They want the joy and do not understand the importance of the pain. This is where the Cross stands tall in our Catholic Church. We know we are not just sinners, rather helpless sinners. For us this is where Christ becomes front and center. This is is where I have discovered the peace that only Christ can bring. Its what other Mormons discover as well here in Northern Utah when they are able to drop the walls around them and honestly inquire. I hope the LDS read my first two blogs. Its for you. Both were printed in the local newspaper. No comments here, but the notes on my own door have been numerous.
patheos.com/community/chooseyourcross/
www.chooseyourcross.com
Do you know how Catholics would focus on Christ’s Passion throughout the year? Have you given this much thought? The Passion is a good movie and Easter is the time to watch. A day or so before would be the best time in preparation for the Celebration of His glorious resurection.I’ve also heard some mormons say this and I agree that it is nonsense. It’s also clearly contradicted by LDS apostles (most notably the sermons of Apostle Niel Maxwell) and by the Book of Mormon itself which talks about the importance of contemplating Christ’s sufferings.
Even though there’s a mild directive in the LDS church to avoid R rated movies, I have yet to meet any Mormon who thought that applied to “Passion of the Christ,” nor have I heard any mormon speak ill of that movie. My family owns a copy, and we view it every Easter. I’ve defended the value of that show with even more passion than I’ve defended the LDS work for the dead. I can link you to other forums where I’ve defended Catholism with no less conviction than anything that I’ve said on this forum.
Not long ago (within a year I think) Cardinal Francis George spoke at BYU. The Mormons here were kind of nuts over him, like he is a celebrity or something. Anyway, he spoke to a large group of BYU students, but before he spoke, he invited everyone there to pray the Our Father with him. It was quite something, to watch this video of all these Mormon praying the Our Father with a Catholic Cardinal.Mary is the mother of the son of God.
And the son of God being part of the Godhead, it is proper as well to call her the Mother of God.
It would make be glad to see the Mormon Tabernacle choir singing some of your beautiful hymns about Mary. I was in a student choir at BYU once, with Max Wiberg our choir director, and we sang one of your Mary hymns. I wish I remembered which one; it was a long time ago.
Hehe. I’ve never been a Catholic, and never crossed myself while living in Catholic countries, but somehow it sunk in, and I find myself crossing myself from time to time. I’ll be honest that I’d be more comfortable if there were more crosses in LDS churches.Not long ago (within a year I think) Cardinal Francis George spoke at BYU. The Mormons here were kind of nuts over him, like he is a celebrity or something. Anyway, he spoke to a large group of BYU students, but before he spoke, he invited everyone there to pray the Our Father with him. It was quite something, to watch this video of all these Mormon praying the Our Father with a Catholic Cardinal.
The interesting thing I noticed was a young woman near the front, who started to cross herself (as we do when we pray), and half way through the sign of the cross put her hands down like she remembered she was either Mormon, or among Mormons.
I wasn’t trying to beat up on Mormons for not making the sign of the cross.Hehe. I’ve never been a Catholic, and never crossed myself while living in Catholic countries, but somehow it sunk in, and I find myself crossing myself from time to time. I’ll be honest that I’d be more comfortable if there were more crosses in LDS churches.
For symbols of Christianity, mormons are probably most confortable with the picture of the partially opened empty tomb. IIRC Catholics like that one too, don’t you?
Yes, we have many paintings of the tomb. To be comfortable is good, but can you see how being a bit uncomfortable might help as well on your spiritual journey? The Cross and the empty tomb go together as one. Like Christmas, His Passion and Death to Easter / Resurrection at every Mass said every two minutes somewhere around the world 24/7.Hehe. I’ve never been a Catholic, and never crossed myself while living in Catholic countries, but somehow it sunk in, and I find myself crossing myself from time to time. I’ll be honest that I’d be more comfortable if there were more crosses in LDS churches.
For symbols of Christianity, mormons are probably most confortable with the picture of the partially opened empty tomb. IIRC Catholics like that one too, don’t you?
Someone (I forget who) recently wrote a Master’s thesis on crosses in Mormon churches in the 19th and early 20th centuries. The thesis included many photos of LDS buildings with crosses on them and in them. Apparently, it only became a big deal in the mid-20th century when there was some kind of conflict between the Catholic bishop in SLC and LDS church leadership, I think over Catholic evangelization efforts in Utah at the time? Rebecca probably knows a lot more about this.Hehe. I’ve never been a Catholic, and never crossed myself while living in Catholic countries, but somehow it sunk in, and I find myself crossing myself from time to time. I’ll be honest that I’d be more comfortable if there were more crosses in LDS churches.
For symbols of Christianity, mormons are probably most confortable with the picture of the partially opened empty tomb. IIRC Catholics like that one too, don’t you?