S
sandusky
Guest
I reaffirm the above the post #671.See my post #642 in which I responded to this statement made by you:
You were the first to mention those issues.
I said:I described his theology as “sacramental,” and said that included the teaching that baptism is a condition for salvation.
From the CCC:
1129 The Church affirms that for believers the sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for salvation. “Sacramental grace” is the grace of the Holy Spirit, given by Christ and proper to each sacrament. The Spirit heals and transforms those who receive him by conforming them to the Son of God. The fruit of the sacramental life is that the Spirit of adoption makes the faithful partakers in the divine nature by uniting them in a living union with the only Son, the Savior.
A red-herring. The issue I raised had nothing to do with Luther, neither did it have anything to do with Calvin, but with Augustine, and his sacramental theology which states that baptism is necessary for salvation (cf CCC para 1129 above).
I did not say that.
You interpret me in the same manner you interpret scripture—wrongly, IMO.
What I said is, baptism is a ***”work of righteousness.”
*** (see my original post #642, and my reaffirmation of that post #660).)
I did not say, ”baptismal regeneration is the equivalent of works righteousness,” as you wrongly say I did.
There’s a big difference between the two wordings.
That should have been evident to you by the Scripture I cited to support my wording: Matthew 3:15. (ISTM that you didn’t read the entire post, but went off at the first point).
Neither do I see that it has anything to do with Augustine, and his sacramental theology.
And I cited Augustine because what he wrote gave a context to the point concerning scripture that I was making to BRB at the time.
So your point is what?** That it’s OK for you** to quote Augustine to give a context, but it’s not OK for me to quote Augustine to give a context?
That’s obvious.