R
Ray_Scheel
Guest
I was pointing out that preventing the perpetually dangerous from harming (directly or indirectly) yet more innocent parties is not just difficult, but impossible given the current near universal consensus about human rights extended to prisoners in the “first world” countries and even Catholic teaching about the teaching of prisoners. Simply repeating the platitude about having the “resources and abilities to work out a secure system” is wasted air when one can’t say it with a straight face about the cases already pointed out where that clearly isn’t true with the practical means allowable other than execution.I am not saying it would be easy, not as easy as ending a life would be. It is sad to see that society has desensitized itself to take the easier way out. We have the resources and abilities to work out a secure system. Since that system would be man made and maintained I’ll admit it would not be infallible. To accept the current system is to accept the proven possibilites of innocent deaths.