P
pnewton
Guest
Yet you came here to this Catholic website, a Church that acknowledges it is morally permissible to eat meat. So there are two possibilities. One, the Church is inconsistent in its conclusion. Two, there is more than the one conclusion you have made. In this case, I say there is more than one conclusion. You have based your conclusion on the one word: unnecessary. You have given it the meaning of something that is absolutely necessary for biological survival. This is not what the Church means. Rather, unnecessary suffering is suffering inflicted above and beyond what is needed for an otherwise good, or neutral goal. Hunting is permitted. Hunting an elephant, cutting off the tusks and leaving it to slowly die, is not.But I can conceive of no circumstance under which eating meat is morally permissible if it is not required for human health or survival.