J
JVSantos
Guest
True presence!
Originally Posted by Dokimas
…
We have quite different understandings, mine are not based on ritualistic things but on relationship.
Is it your opinion that catholic doctrine is ritual without relationship?The OT rituals foreshaddowed the coming of Jesus. In and of themselves, they did nothing or God would not have done away with the Old Covenant replacing it with the New.
I saw your first post…that you don’t believe in the real presence…indeed it is in the Bible!If you saw Jesus hanging on the cross after he died, would you go up to him and drink his blood and eat is flesh?
Right. I would say they did something since God gave them as such and everything that God gives is worth everything. Now we have new ones. We as Catholics know that God has given us new Rituals to celebrate the life, death and resurrection of Christ. New Rituals as we wait for his coming again. In the Old, the Jews celebrated the Passover, today we celebrate the Passover in teh Eucharist. In the Old they had circuncision. Today, we have the Baptism, these are all Rituals given to us by God, and so forth. As you see New Ones prevailed. Of course, I cannot expect you to know this since you are not a Catholic, you wouldnt have way of knowing.The OT rituals foreshaddowed the coming of Jesus. In and of themselves, they did nothing or God would not have done away with the Old Covenant replacing it with the New.
Tantum ergo Sacramentum
The ritual - in and of itself - does nothing.Come now. Discussing with you gets no where. You only seem to want to attack what you don’t want to understand.
What I believe is that the rituals do NOTHING. It’s the obedience they represent that is everything.
Ritual is like an idol.
The idol can do nothing as Elijah showed the prophets of Baal.
Our physical part is the small part of us. Ask Anne Johnson Flint (when you get to Heaven where she is right now.) Google her and read her story.The ritual - in and of itself - does nothing.
**BUT **- God, knowing that we are physical beings, gave us rituals so that we could relate. My point is that he NEVER abolished rituals. He simply changed them.
A ritual is not like an idol - it may be like an icon - but nbot an idol. An idol is an evil thing, because it is worshipped. An icon, on the other hand is a reminder of something. Do NOT confuse the two . . .
If anybody truly believes that rituals were abolished in the New Covenant - they neither understand the Gospel nor the will of God.
Dok, what’s wrong with ceremonies or rites used in a place of worship? They don’t defocus from Jesus; they focus on Jesus Christ.The OT rituals foreshaddowed the coming of Jesus. In and of themselves, they did nothing or God would not have done away with the Old Covenant replacing it with the New.
And nothing has changed since then. It still apply to today this command. Thank you.
The Smyrnaeans probably were trying to do things their way when this letter was sent to them. I dont no why we have become so acceptive of things that are not from God now and days. Rebellious people always existed but they were stopped. Today, rebellious men seem to have a great amount of freedom to do whatever they want without condemnation, that is why they seem to be growing everywhere. ** Where are those who were commanded to protect the Truth?**
Dok, what’s wrong with ceremonies or rites used in a place of worship? They don’t defocus from Jesus; they focus on Jesus Christ.![]()
Oh maaan!:whacky::whacky:If you saw Jesus hanging on the cross after he died, would you go up to him and drink his blood and eat is flesh?
IIs there any question? Real Presence. Seems that He was pretty clear.
Interesting that as far back as the Nicene Creed…there was no argument about that. Even Luther didn’t deny the Real Presence.
How people got so far away from it I have no idea:shrug:
Yes Richard he was. As I asked before if he was just telling everyone that he was just a symbol why would they call him MAD for that. Why would they walk away for that??You can give me this? What I was pointing out was that Jesus was talking symbolically here. I mean Jesus was not saying that He was really bread here was He? Well what was He saying? He says “he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.” So eating the bread of life in this context is comming to the Lord and **believing **So how do we do that? Well Jesus says Jn.6:63b the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. So Jesus says that the way we eat His body and drink His blood is to BELEIVE the words He says.
Well look at the reaction when he was teaching it, was it accepted, was it understood, did many walk away? No, THey understood THAT teaching also, but accepted it.He also said to pluck out one’s eye and cut off one’s hand. Did He mean this literally?
Well let me ask you this Matt do you believe that Jesus was both Human and divine? Do you beliieve that he had the power from heaven to do what he did on this earth?After placing faith in God, in the NT, in the Catholic Church’s interpretations, you then must place faith in the humans of the early church having had everything right from the get go. You must place faith in ECFs and the Catholic Church’s interpretations of their writings. Takes a lot of faith steps to get to where you are. But then the Apostle Paul said we walk by faith and not by sight. Maybe if you read for just an example, about Protestant thinking regarding Augustine and some things he said figuratively, you might get at least a better understanding of a different belief even if you yourself do not share the same faith. And one can believe in more than symbolic but at the same time in a real presence of God’s spirit. I understand all better now.
What are you talking about Matt? And my answer is yes, a closet gay priest is quite biblical is, it is called a SIN. ANd what about a Priest that sins and covers it up, that would also be called a sin. What is a Priest called that promises to Love Christ, and teach his word and then fall from grace, and chooses sin, Simple, check out History, the word is a JUDAS, a betrayer of Christ.I don’t know any believer who takes it lightly. All one can do is place their faith where they believe the Holy Spirit is guiding them to be when they open their heart to God’s Spirit.
Just because something may or may not be “history” does not mean it is perfect. Many things have occured in history which have not exactly been good things. But neither does it mean something is not true. We simply truly do not know in matters of faith and belief as much as we may want to believe we do. That is why it is called faith. You may not be a revisionist but the Catholic Church has revised disciplines or guidelines thru the yrs.
Would a closeted gay priest having a secret homosexual relationship unbeknownst to you be Biblical? What about the priests who have molested children or the bishops would who have covered it up? Baptism by immersion of someone of a greater age than infancy is clearly found in the Bible. But assuming households had infants, there are examples of households being baptized as well. So it comes down to faith.
The question is not so much about whether Jesus promised truth. It is more about whether He has to correct or reform His Church and where He takes it, to prevent the gates from prevailing as He promised they would not do. And again that is where faith comes in. I do not understand why folks can not believe they “know” if that is what they need. While at the same time recognizing faith and belief is not the same as absolute certainty. I am sorry but that concept just totally escapes my reasoning. But I guess we may just have to agree to disagree. God bless you on your walk and peace.
Matt thinks that if one believes than it must be true. Relativism at best. Just because somebody says they have the Holy Spirit, it doesnt mean it is true. they have been told they do and they simply believed. But we know that the HS would not lead anyone from God’s Church. that is how we know they dont have it. If the CC is right about the Eucharist then any contrary to that, it is not from the HS. The Father, the Son and the HS are not in contradiction with one another, that we know for sure. Thanks be to God there is a wrong and a right. I think people, now and days are very confused about the Truth. They can no longer identify it. Today, it is all about emotionalism friendship. it is all about being friends, forget about defending the Truth. We Catholics are called to be defenders of the Truth, the Faith, and not to seek friendship. Many of us have become cowards and no longer care about what is True.What are you talking about Matt? And my answer is yes, a closet gay priest is quite biblical is, it is called a SIN. ANd what about a Priest that sins and covers it up, that would also be called a sin. What is a Priest called that promises to Love Christ, and teach his word and then fall from grace, and chooses sin, Simple, check out History, the word is a JUDAS, a betrayer of Christ.
What are you driving at now? Are you trying to say that because a Priest falls from grace and chooses sin over God’s work makes the truth he is teaching false? Then what about the truth that CHrist taught then?? DId because Judas betray Christ make the truth Christ teaches false also then, Because then, it is the same thing.
What is the difference between a Priest falling to sin, and Judas falling to sin? Did they both not betray God?
Tell me Matt, do you not think that Jesus knew Judas would betray him??? Do you not think that Jesus knew that a Priest would also betray him? Why do you think that Jesus warned us that the devil was the Master of DISQUISE in HIS own clothing?
And are you trying to say that if a Priest falls from grace and chooses sin over God as Judas did, Man can bring down the CC? Because if you feel that a mere Priest can bring down the CC, then you are saying that the devil can beat Christ! IS that what you are saying, because you sure implied it.
When someone says that the CC was reformed, who reformed it then? IT has to be Man, because the Holy Spirit is who guides the CC, Jesus promised us that, IF the CC is reformed it has to be by Man then, Not God. God did not promise us to reform the CHurch, he promised us he would be with it always, until the end of time.
So what are you saying Matt?
Oh Matt, then you are in big trouble my friend, I can see why you are so confused. You see that is why we as Catholic’s have not doubt in what we are taught because we believe this ONE simple sentence.Hi Denise, I’ve posted more than once we may have to agree to disagree and let it go. But while I won’t name names certain posters more than others keep following me around it seems and bringing it up everywhere I go! I simply can not believe that anyone’s faith, not just Catholics, can be proclaimed to be for certain the truth. Well it can be proclaimedbut to truly know with absolute 100% certainty is another thing I believe. Here we are on the non Catholic forum but yup many here stand up very well for what they believe!
Peace my friend.
It started when they felt that they could believe what THEY wanted to believe. When they decided that they all had the truth in Them!Is there any question? Real Presence. Seems that He was pretty clear.
Interesting that as far back as the Nicene Creed…there was no argument about that. Even Luther didn’t deny the Real Presence.
How people got so far away from it I have no idea:shrug:
Was she canonized a saint by the Catholic Church? If not - we don’t know whether she made it to heaven. We can hope and pray that she did.Our physical part is the small part of us. Ask Anne Johnson Flint (when you get to Heaven where she is right now.) Google her and read her story.