The Existence of Faeries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtoddm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Certainly I can reference the work, although it is obscure to say the least. It is called “Secrets of the Hollow Earth,” by Warren Smith, and it discusses the possibility the earth has no core. How this relates to the Hollow Earth topic directly I have no idea, however I noticed the story when I read it and I have remembered it ever since. The original in the book obviously had more detail than I could furnish here.

I will try and see what else I can dig up, although most of my works on faeries are not written from a historical perspective. The sole exception that comes to mind is the voluminous Element Encyclopedia of Witchcraft, which has extensive entries on faeries from a historical standpoint, especially in Ireland.
OK, thanks Eve - and therein lies my problem with delving too much into the subject: the witchcraft connection - I would be afraid of having a book by the title of “Encyclopedia of Witchcraft” on my shelf but that’s just me - : )

also, Internet searches on faerie-lore mostly bring up Wiccan and New Age sites, the dabbling in summoning and communing techniques, embracing the “beings of light”, and letting them guide one into deep truths - that kind of thing is frankly repellent to me–I prefer the earthy peasant folk oral traditions - like the little story about the monks and the “dwarf”

I did find that C.S. Lewis had a belief of sorts in faeries and such, which I will see about - he wrote about it his book The Discarded Image, an analysis of medieval thought, and he interjects his own assessments and theories - luckily my public library has a copy and it’s on reserve for me (I don’t buy books if I can help it unless it’s one that I’ll read over and over) : )

I was unsuccessful to find what the Irish saints Patrick Columba and Bridgit had to say on the subject -

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
 
I love my Irish priest like a brother. He’s the kind of guy that you can’t dislike.
Can’t ask him about this, for I fear coming from me he would think I am being disparaging to the Irish in asking as a skeptic.
I’ve already posed similar senarios to him without them being Irish centered. He may feel as if I am attacking his heritage if I were to seek his opinion on this matter. I can’t risk our friendship over this one.
I wish you the best in your search, but admit that I just don’t see a valid reason (argument from tradition/or “authority” as valid) to hold such beliefs. I liked the citations you provided, and thank you for that. It does help me see another view of belief I did not realize was there.
In conclusion, I think I will return to my earlier comment.
Once you believe in one supernatural agent, it becomes very hard to deny other supernatural agents.
Best to you in your search,

StrawberryJ
: ) maybe he wouldn’t mind so much, who knows?

I think that I’m feeling that there are only angels and demons of various levels and degrees, higher and lower, who can interact with humans, and these may account for many supernatural “encounters” which have been reported (faeries, ghosts, possessions, even the “little grey men” aliens)- this seems to be a solid theory given Catholic doctrines, St. Thomas Aquinas (my first post), and the (name removed by moderator)ut of others on the matter

Here’s an interesting article in Our Sunday Visitor:

osv.com/TCANav/TCAQuestionoftheDay/Sept8142007/tabid/4424/Default.aspx

scroll down to the 2nd question on poltergeists, it mentions faeries too, and quotes some interesting references from Catholic clergy

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
 
: ) maybe he wouldn’t mind so much, who knows?

I think that I’m feeling that there are only angels and demons of various levels and degrees, higher and lower, who can interact with humans, and these may account for many supernatural “encounters” which have been reported (faeries, ghosts, possessions, even the “little grey men” aliens)- this seems to be a solid theory given Catholic doctrines, St. Thomas Aquinas (my first post), and the (name removed by moderator)ut of others on the matter

Here’s an interesting article in Our Sunday Visitor:

osv.com/TCANav/TCAQuestionoftheDay/Sept8142007/tabid/4424/Default.aspx

scroll down to the 2nd question on poltergeists, it mentions faeries too, and quotes some interesting references from Catholic clergy

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
Although I am sure there must be more than meets the eye here it seems that all we have here is anecdotal evidence cited from Mr. Wesley.

From the article:
But there are so many reports from relatively recent times that are well documented, with multiple, reliable observers, that it’s difficult just to dismiss the matter altogether. One of the best-known accounts comes from a no-less-reputable figure than John Wesley,
snip

It is not “difficult” to dismiss the matter and leave the possibility open. It is however, very easy to consider it very improbable.
  1. What documentation is there? The claim is there are so many reports, and they are well documented. What supports these claims?
  2. The conclusion is reached for you here by stating it is difficult to dismiss the matter.
    I would like to have the data to determine if it is, or is not.
  3. Best known accounts from a “no-less reputable” figure than John Wesley?
    His authority would be?
 
I’m not sure what that means either - or how these posts show that theology is “useless” - quite the contrary…
but Hubriss, I used to be agnostic myself - welcome to the journey

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
You guys don’t see the irony in the statement, “He does not rule out the idea that God could alow the spirit of a dead human to appear on earth, but the key is that God is in charge and none of this can happen or occur without His will or approval.” and the claimed fact of possessions of humans by demons for which exorcists are supposedly needed? To be clear, David FW did not just mean dead spirits, he meant everything, as asked by EnchantedEve.

So you say God wills and approves of possessions and demons entering our world, yet exorcists are then supposedly needed to get rid of them. Exorcism is rubbish.

I say Theology is useless when it can be used to pretend to rationally provide an explanation for fairies, leprechauns, unicorns, and ninja turtles. As a means for determining truth, theology is useless.
OK, thanks Eve - and therein lies my problem with delving too much into the subject: the witchcraft connection - I would be afraid of having a book by the title of “Encyclopedia of Witchcraft” on my shelf but that’s just me - : )
Lol. Scary witchcraft is what is needed to dissuade you huh? Good thing we have nonsense beliefs to limit the amount of nonsense beliefs we have.
 
  1. Best known accounts from a “no-less reputable” figure than John Wesley?
    His authority would be?
About the same as the authority of any other minister/pastor/priest who claimed they personally experienced it. People tend to see religious figures as trustworthy and not likely to make things up. Maybe…maybe not.

If the Pope made such a claim, would you believe him?

Miz
 
About the same as the authority of any other minister/pastor/priest who claimed they personally experienced it. People tend to see religious figures as trustworthy and not likely to make things up. Maybe…maybe not.

If the Pope made such a claim, would you believe him?

Miz
Finally, an intelligent question.
If the Pope made such a claim, I would expect from the current Pope an explaination of the claim. He has had time to address these issues.

I have seen nothing yet.
 
You guys don’t see the irony in the statement, “He does not rule out the idea that God could alow the spirit of a dead human to appear on earth, but the key is that God is in charge and none of this can happen or occur without His will or approval.” and the claimed fact of possessions of humans by demons for which exorcists are supposedly needed? To be clear, David FW did not just mean dead spirits, he meant everything, as asked by EnchantedEve.

So you say God wills and approves of possessions and demons entering our world, yet exorcists are then supposedly needed to get rid of them. Exorcism is rubbish.

I say Theology is useless when it can be used to pretend to rationally provide an explanation for fairies, leprechauns, unicorns, and ninja turtles. As a means for determining truth, theology is useless.

Lol. Scary witchcraft is what is needed to dissuade you huh? Good thing we have nonsense beliefs to limit the amount of nonsense beliefs we have.
Forgive me, I am not sure I see a framed argument here, however I will do the best I can with what I have been furnished.

Allow and approve are not the same thing, and if we are going to have a “rational” discussion of theology, than we had best keep are word defined.

Yes, God, in accordance with traditional understanding, permits all things. This contrast to saying He wills all things. If God did not wish something to occur, He could stop it from occuring. But this is not how God works. He is infinite, and therefore does not make finite decisions. When God is viewed in the former way, He becomes the partisan gods of old, who acted in finite knowledge in spaces of time, and not infinite prisms of existence, as He does. The finite nature of our being causes us to decide to choose or choose not. God does not do this. He just Is. God thinks nothing of the past and has no consideration of the future, and, in fact, does not consider at all. These are all things we do, and when we understand God otherwise, we understand Him within the narrow limits of our human “rational” understanding.

Excorcism is not rubbish if you understand demons to be finite beings acting in infinite space and time. The priest merely calls upon grace, already present in the world from the beginning of time, and calls upon it in Christ’s Holy Name to overtake the negative forces of demonic physical power and basically “push” the demon, who is the absence of love and grace, and replaces it with love and grace. Demons are merely spirits of negation, and the filling of a soul with love leaves no space for a demon, for nature abhores a void. A demon, therefore, is like a spiritual “black hole,” which the priest eliminates with the Love of God.

Theology would not explain any of the things listed above because theology is the study of God, greek Theo, not folk spirits and legends, though you may say otherwise. Theology does not determine Truth anymore than we determine the sky is blue. Theology is an active excercise in defining and discovering the Truth as it has always existed. Truth is out there, we need only to find, but first you must have a foundation from which to build understanding from, and that foundation we call theology.

It is easy to dismiss ideas and concepts as inconsequential, and we have the mind to do so. One should simply not be shocked when no one finds it admirable to dismiss ideas rather than seek them.
 
About the same as the authority of any other minister/pastor/priest who claimed they personally experienced it. People tend to see religious figures as trustworthy and not likely to make things up. Maybe…maybe not.

If the Pope made such a claim, would you believe him?

Miz
Depends on how good his story is.

But in all honesty, it does not matter if the Pope said it, because the authority invested in him does not guarantee his ability to discern all things. It would be interesting because its the Pope, but it would not carry greater weight, aside from the incidental fact it would prove the Pope’s personal belief in the subject.

Pope Pius XII claimed he saw the Virgin Mother in the Vatican Garden, and great Pope though he was, I genuinely do not believe this story. I do not think he lied, I just think the sun got to him. He is still of course, only a man.
 
OK, thanks Eve - and therein lies my problem with delving too much into the subject: the witchcraft connection - I would be afraid of having a book by the title of “Encyclopedia of Witchcraft” on my shelf but that’s just me - : )

also, Internet searches on faerie-lore mostly bring up Wiccan and New Age sites, the dabbling in summoning and communing techniques, embracing the “beings of light”, and letting them guide one into deep truths - that kind of thing is frankly repellent to me–I prefer the earthy peasant folk oral traditions - like the little story about the monks and the “dwarf”

I did find that C.S. Lewis had a belief of sorts in faeries and such, which I will see about - he wrote about it his book The Discarded Image, an analysis of medieval thought, and he interjects his own assessments and theories - luckily my public library has a copy and it’s on reserve for me (I don’t buy books if I can help it unless it’s one that I’ll read over and over) : )

I was unsuccessful to find what the Irish saints Patrick Columba and Bridgit had to say on the subject -

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
Then you probably would not enjoy a visit to my house. 😉 😃

Anyhow, yes, the so-called New Age has kind of stolen the thunder of faerie-lore, but this makes the traditional folk tales no less interesting or relevent.
 
Then you probably would not enjoy a visit to my house. 😉 😃
: ) nothing against you of course -

As far as the Pope, and someone brought up unicorns - if you search on ‘Pope’ and ‘unicorn’ and ‘horn’ you will find that there are a few medieval Popes who were reportedly presented unicorn horns, or “alicorns” as gifts - these were fairly common during the Middle Ages and supposed to have magical powers - these were probably narwhale tusks passed off for unicorn horns, but some believe even today that there really were unicorns at one time - that’s a different issue but is interesting - a unicorn is not however a totally unbelievable creature, as say a Killmoulis is - it is a horse with a horn, so what? a giraffe looks more bizarre and unbelievable come to think of it - the question would be it’s magical properties

As a Catholic one must admit some supernatural elements, Scripture is full of it - I believe in the approved apparitions of Lourdes and Fatima, but they are not the foundation of my faith
Theology is founded on such - theology is the study of the God after you believe -
Philosophy can lead you part of the way to belief, but it is ultimately Faith which takes you there, and that is a gift of God

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
 
As a Catholic one must admit some supernatural elements, Scripture is full of it - I believe in the approved apparitions of Lourdes and Fatima, but they are not the foundation of my faith -
Theology is founded on such - theology is the study of the God after you believe -
Philosophy can lead you part of the way to belief, but it is ultimately Faith which takes you there, and that is a gift of God

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
I meant to say, of course that “Theology is Not founded on such”, on private revelations that is -

—todd
catholicsojourner.blogspot.com
 
“So you say God wills and approves of possessions and demons entering our world, yet exorcists are then supposedly needed to get rid of them. Exorcism is rubbish.”

Well, if you are going to make THAT statement then you are going to have to say that a substantial portion of the New Testament is rubbish too, because Jesus our Lord certainly was an Exorcist as were his Apostles and Disciples, unless you take the unfortunate position of many of our Episcopalian brethren and suggest that all of that, (including hell) is just metaphor. But then it all falls apart doesn’t it, because could our Lord really have suffered and died to save us from a metaphor?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top