The FBI director just totally shut down Donald Trump's vote-fraud conspiracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter RidgeSprinter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RidgeSprinter

Guest
"Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise," Wray said in response to a question about the safety of voting by mail, which millions of Americans are expected to do amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

Wray was testifying in front of the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Under oath. Meaning that if he didn’t tell the truth about his knowledge in regard to what he knew about the record of fraudulent voting by mail, he would be committing a crime.
Click to expand...
 
I’m sure he’ll be accused of being “deep state” any moment now. Or a closet Democrat. Or a reptilian overlord.
 
Yeah in spite of ballots being tossed out,etc and the questionable trustworthiness of the FBI,who cares,it is what it is…Truth will out!🙏
 
Last edited:
Indeed!:roll_eyes:…Comey and Meuller both are
Republicans and they are as corrupt as the day is long,as are apparently many higher ups in the FBI
 
Last edited:
Indeed! Just as Trump and Barr is as corrupt as the day is long and maybe even longer.

😱​

 
Last edited:
"puer.dei:
And we all know that Trump hires “only the best!” He said so himself, so it must be true.
Click to expand...
Did you ever notice though, he seems to corrupt them all. After he is done with them, they are all disgruntled, losers, whackos, etc.
 
Dovekin said:
Did you ever notice though, he seems to corrupt them all. After he is done with them, they are all disgruntled, losers, whackos, etc.
Click to expand...
Yes, it’s really sad what close contact with him does to the very best people. Maybe if he hired some losers, it would work in reverse?
 
Mr. Trump hires in good faith, and when those he hires stabs him in the back, he gets rid of them as any competent employer would. Then, they go off and write derogatory books about him, after he was good enough to (initially) give them a job. Never once do they admit they had deserved to be fired.

The people he hires serve at his pleasure. When he is no longer pleased with them, they’re gone. That’s his prerogative.

Often, when applying for a job, the applicant gives a good impression, and the employer is willing to give him or her a chance. It takes time to ascertain whether or not that hire will work out. It’s that way in business, and it’s that way with the presidency. Mr. Trump isn’t the only president who has ever removed and replaced someone he earlier hired.
 
JanR said:
Mr. Trump isn’t the only president who has ever removed and replaced someone he earlier hired.
Click to expand...
You are right.

He may be the first president to say he only hires the best people, and then insults those people that he hired. Most people are honest enough to admit they may have made a mistake, but Trump just keeps “hiring the best” and insulting those he got rid of.
 
RidgeSprinter said:
" Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise," Wray said in response to a question about the safety of voting by mail, which millions of Americans are expected to do amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.
Click to expand...
This is why people call the Fake news out. Notice that this stops abruptly, and the quote says there has not been historically. Right?

Then he continued:
FBI Director Wray: "We have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise. We have seen voter fraud at the local level from time to time."

He did not shut down President Trump. That is CNN “inflammatory” language to get people “angry” or “exited” making click bait, to make money. This is what we deal with every day. Insert Opinion in the article, to bait people in.

The guy did say we do not have National Voter Fraud historically. Great. That is a good thing. Has it been tried? I remember reading about past efforts, even from early in the 1800’s. This is why “Elections” became quite secure in the USA.

That said: He did mentioned that from time to time, it happened at local levels.

So we do have evidence of fraud. This year we have had fraud already.

This is sleazy from CNN.
 
RidgeSprinter said:
" Now, we have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise,"
Click to expand...
I’m sure that had nothing to do with the fact that there has never been a coordinated national voter fraud investigation. Trump tried to do one, but over 45 states refused to allow any investigation to occur.

Can’t find voter fraud if you refuse to look.
 
Useless said:
over 45 states refused to allow any investigation to occur.
Click to expand...
Gee, I didn’t know there were 45 blue states. 🤔

Oh, wait, there aren’t. So there must have been a bunch of Republican-led states that recognized there was something off about that “investigation.”
 
There is at least one thing of which we can be certain, and that is, if Trump wins the election, he will not utter one more word about mail-in voting fraud. And to his most staunch supporters, his sudden silence on the issue would be perfectly reasonable.
 
The was no doubt voter fraud the last election,which is why the Dems have been so apoplectic the last four years.i n spite of their nefarious attempts Trump prevailed anyway.Its a God thing.🙏
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top