Amen to that, David.
I think most of these documents miss the larger picture when they single out all these particular abuses. In many parishes, the problem isnāt so much abuses, as it is just a lack of reverence. But the things that used to make up a āreverentā Mass were not always indicated in the rubrics. They were just common practice.
For example, when I was a postulant for the Society of Saint John Cantius, we altar boys were taught to always walk reverently, with our hands folded. All movements of the servers were supposed to be purposeful and ritualized. Now, in most parishes, the servers donāt have this demeanor at all. So you could theoretically have a non-abusive Mass, but one that still isnāt reverent, or conducive to an appreciation of the sacred.
I canāt stand the way that priests conduct themselves when they say Mass. Hands are down by their side, theyāll pick eye-crud or scratch their nose, play with their fingers or fidget when they sit, take off their glasses and put them on the altar, etc. From the same church:
a6.cpimg.com/image/A2/D3/31464866-55df-0226019D-.jpg
These are not specific things that can be addressed by a document. Theyāre a state-of-mind, a disposition, that a priest either has, or hasnāt.
That Church looks very familiar to a photo I saw where the Tridentine Mass was being said in Germany.
Itās such a beautiful Church tooā¦
Hereās what the church looks like when *** isnāt been said there:
mypage.bluewin.ch/karl.baer/album/kirche/index.htm
I hate myself for having to say that.