The future of Europe is Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ogdisciple
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not judging you, I don’t have the authority to do that.
I have no doubt there are imams who preach that and Muslims who believe it but to cite that as evidence that Muslims are taking over Europe is absurd. There are communist in Europe who call for overthrowing governments, but does that mean its going to happen? No, because they’re so few and insignificant and nobody takes them seriously. I don’t think you understand how small the Muslim population in Europe is - even if every single muslim accepted the idea that their religious duty was to overthrow the european nations they lived in (which if you talked to any random muslim, they would find absurd) it wouldn’t really be a threat.
I agree that converting them should be a duty and priority - you don’t do that by refusing to help them and sending them back to the Muslim states they’re sometimes risking their lives to get away from.
 
-More than 32,617 Islamic terror atracks against Christians since 9/11
…and how about any drone and missile “colateral” damage. War casualties from the unnecessary Iraqi invasion and the subsequent instability in the region. We’re not exactly the “country of peace”.
 
Contrary to belief, Islam isn’t a religion void of non practicing people. You don’t hear much about it because in Islamic countries if you say that out loud your liable to die.
In reality Muslims in Europe and America are far more liberal in comparison. Many Muslims I went to college with only identified with it culturally.
Humanism isn’t only an affect on Christianity.

With that said, thousands of people convert to the Catholic Church from Islam every year. The reason Islam is expanding so much is birth rates compared to the Christian world. That’s it. If you look at actual converts a much larger go from Islam to Christianity and not vice versa. Especially in Africa where Christianity is expanding greatly.
 
Imagine if some group went into another nation and demanded their own legal system and did not abide by the existing laws?
I brought up very specific scenarios on here a while back. I took real stories in Europe and changed the cultural groups and the nations.

I was told I was spreading Stormfront talking points.
As a European catholic I do not believe that the Muslim will take over Europe. Firstly, the churches has never been so full of people as they are know.
Where are you seeing this at?
 
I believe the Crusades were justified because they were a war to protect Christendom and believe that Christendom is under just as great a threat now as they were then. I would support and gladly fight in a new Crusade.
Lets re-look at what you actually said again:
Muslims are disproportionately responsible for terror, mayhem, radicalism, and destruction.
Close doors and bash them doesn’t even come close to what I would like to do…
You call yourself a Christian - yet this portrays the same love of violence, power and revenge you criticise. This is the same eye for eye stuff Jesus rejected. You will convert no one with this sort of language or example.
 
They are not Europeans. Moving to China does not make me Chinese.
No because moving to America and getting American citizenship means you are an American.
If you are born in Europe and you have French or Belgian citizenship, then you are European.
 
Last edited:
…and how about any drone and missile “colateral” damage. War casualties from the unnecessary Iraqi invasion and the subsequent instability in the region. We’re not exactly the “country of peace”.
Yeah, except none of those attacks were by legitimate States currently engaged in war. They were non-State actors specifically targeting civilians. More specifically, Christian civilians.
 
You call yourself a Christian - yet this portrays the same love of violence, power and revenge you criticise.
Because I want a Crusade?
This is the same eye for eye stuff Jesus rejected.
He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
You will convert no one with this sort of language or example.
Wrong. I’ve seen a lot of alt-right poltards converted by this kind of language.
 
This is so baseless. Islam is a tiny minority in terms of European population.
 
He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.
Please spare us the predictable “God/virtue/USA/mother/apple-pie is on our side” tautologies.
It sounds just the same as the earnest Jihadi polemics on YouTube by the same Muslim fighters you yourself rail against.

I’ll leave readers with your noble “Christian” sentiments on the matter lest we forget:
Close doors and bash [the Muslims] doesn’t even come close to what I would like to do…
 
40.png
pocaracas:
I write about a multi generational shift, and you give me people who have moved on in the past few years…
I see you didn’t read the blog post.
I did.
Did you ever notice that a lot of these radicals in the West are second and third generation immigrants?
Fringes happen.
Luckily, those radicals are a small minority, shunned even by their Muslim peers.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...acks-uk-nichtmituns-not-with-us-a7792876.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ce-terror-is-islamic-state-iggo-a7790941.html
The very people you think will adapt to society are rejecting it.
Clearly… -.-’
 
No. I won’t shut up. Because I am right. You are wrong. What you suggest is wrong. So I’ll keep on speaking the truth and you can keep on dodging and hedging and running around in intellectual circles, but at the end of the day, it’s not your type that changes anything.
 
The Europeans are bringing about their own demise.

click here google youtube europe islam - YouTube
 
Last edited:
Yeah, except none of those attacks were by legitimate States currently engaged in war. They were non-State actors specifically targeting civilians. More specifically, Christian civilians.
Nazi Germany, the proxy war of the USSR, WWII Japan, etc. were legitimate states; being a legitimate state does not justify its actions. By your definition our own revolution was illegitimate since we were a non-state at the time, what was done could basically be described as Guerrilla warfare. We do not always take the high road and we are not always right.
 
Last edited:
You should see all of the Muslim imams and scholars who have converted to Christianity in the last 10 years.
 
Yeah, except none of those attacks were by legitimate States currently engaged in war. They were non-State actors specifically targeting civilians. More specifically, Christian civilians.
Nazi Germany, the proxy war of the USSR, WWII Japan, etc. were legitimate states; being a legitimate state does not justify its actions. By your definition our own revolution was illegitimate since we were a non-state at the time, what was done could basically be described as Guerrilla warfare. We do not always take the high road and we are not always right.
[/quote]

If I may I think the point Mr Monk is trying to make is that civilians and innocent people are being deliberately targeted by Muslims extremists for purely terrorist reasons. They are not military value targets. And they acknowledge this and continue this mission. The Bataclan massacre in Paris comes to mind. Victims were butchered alive even having their genitals cut off and put in their mouths.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top