K
Kliska
Guest
Thank you! Very interesting observations.In order, I presume the following: Gates are entry and exit to ancient cities in the Middle East. They were also centers of commerce, government and, most importantly, defense. At its most simple, “shall not prevail” means that those gates will not be capable of resisting an offensive force. I take “it” to be a reference to the church established by Jesus Christ. There are, of course, entire other possibilities as to how all of this is interpreted, and I intend to read the mentioned piece at opportunity. I’m interested in seeing how others might have taken “gates” as a definition.
Taken as a literal whole, my most basic understanding of the statement is as follows: The defenses of our enemy will not be able to resist the church. If the enemy’s defenses cannot resist us—and I take Christ’s words as true—then we are guaranteed victory, sooner or later. In the mindset of that time, losing your gates was a bad thing. The statement appears to presume that the church is to be deployed as an offensive weapon against the gates of Hell.
Whether that deployment is a day-in, day-out “little” war against those gates, fought by us in the here-and-now, or is some gigantic battle worthy of a grand cinematic experience and scored by Hans Zimmer, led by none other than Christ or the appropriate angel(s) at some future point is unknown to me. Eventually, we’ll find out. This is one of the complications arising from dealing with entities who were, are and will be as opposed to mere humanity which isn’t.
The funny thing about this particular thread is that I’d been thinking about this very phrase earlier in the week after I’d been thinking about needing an excuse to jump in here at CAF and participate. I saw this late yesterday and thought that the close proximity of those two events could not be mere coincidence.