Here is a much more detailed answer to your query, Wedgewood:
romancatholicblog.typepad.com/roman_catholic_blog/2007/02/index.html
You’ll have to scroll down about 1/4; the title of the entry is “Sr. Joan is full of Chit” (hey, I didn’t write it!).
Here’s an excerpt:
Sister Joan D. Chittister is a member of the Benedictine Sisters of Erie, Pennsylvania. She is known to dissent from Church teaching, especially with respect to the Church’s teaching that the sacrament of Holy Orders can only be validly conferred to a man. She writes a column for the National Catholic Reporter. The National Catholic Reporter is often called the National Catholic Distorter, partly as a way to distinguish it from the National Catholic Register, which is published by The Legionaries of Christ, but mainly because the NCR is a newspaper that is known to support dissent from the Magisterium, and is one of the primary organs of Catholic dissent in the United States (along with the “Catholic” magazines Commonweal, America, and U.S. Catholic).
In 2006 Sr. Joan was an invited panalist on “Meet the Press” with Tim Russert; in 2004, a guest on “Now with Bill Moyers,” and during the Papal funeral and election in April 2005, she was a commentator for the BBC from Rome. It seems likely that she was chosen to represent the Church on these broadcasts precisely because of her dissent and left leaning politics. It is maddening that these news organizations have Sr. Joan represent the Church at all, but even more so, since they seldom (if ever) tell viewers that Sr. Joan Chittister is heterodox, or at least that she is a dissenting Catholic nun.
Gerald at The Cafeteria Is Closed has called attention to the most recent, extremely problematic column Sr. Joan has written for the National Catholic Reporter: Moral relativism at work
Sr. Joan’s most recent column is here: Morality: Is it a many-splendored thing?
The column begins by discussing the issues surrounding the drinking and driving laws in Ireland. Reasonable people can disagree about different ways to prevent people from driving while intoxicated, and thereby promote public safety. As for the morality of deliberate intoxication, that is clearly sinful, and if done with sufficient reflection and full consent, it is a mortal sin.
I’d like to read your comments, but only if you’ve read the entire article.
Blessed Lent,
Mimi
We are expected to defend the precious gift of faith lest we lose it (cf. 1 Tim. 1:18-19; Catechism, no. 162). The First Commandment “requires us to
nourish and protect our faith with prudence and vigilance, and to reject everything that is opposed to it” (Catechism, no. 2088).
cuf.org/LayWitness/Articles/Archive/Sep01/Sep01suprenant.asp