B
Bubba_Switzler
Guest
I agree with you that Real Presence is consistent with scripture, I’ve never disputed that.You don’t have an evidence problem. You concede that scripture arises from the Church and not the other way around. Yet some nagging reservation keeps you from acknowledging that belief in the Real Presence is *consistent *withScripture, *very early *and continuous. I find it compelling that Ignatius of Antioch, who was Evangelized by the man who wrote the Bread of Life Discourse (!) believes that “This is my body” means “This IS my body.”
But I find it entirely plausible that the concept of Real Presence was discovered (to use the preferred term here), and the practice spread, sometime in the 40 years after 65AD and that there was a great discontinuity in the early Church at that time leading, ultimately, to other adaptations as well (e.g. the institutionalized clergy).
What’s so special, you might ask, about 65AD? Well, if you’ll recall your history, 70AD was the destruction of the Jewish Temple which threw everyone into turmoil. The war actually began in 66AD (and Masada fell in 73AD).