The Lord has redeemed all of us....Pope Francis

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMJCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Its been said, but I’ll repeat it, Pope Francis didnt say anything like what youre implying here. All he said is that Christ redeemed all people, even atheists. That means salvation is offered to all, not that all are saved. A person needs faith to accept that salvation and be saved. There is a huge difference between redemption and salvation. There is nothing to be upset about what he actually said, just what people are twisting it into.
“Faith” means more than one thing. It means assent to revealed truth, and atheists don’t have it in that sense, but it also means Fidelity to Love, and some atheists do display that kind of Faith.

It’s O.K. by me if God lets atheists into heaven by judging them according to the Standard of Love, and infuses them with Knowledge (not Faith) of the Apostles’ Creed as they exit Purgatory.

Is that O.K. with you?
 
“Faith” means more than one thing. It means assent to revealed truth, and atheists don’t have it in that sense, but it also means Fidelity to Love, and some atheists do display that kind of Faith.

It’s O.K. by me if God lets atheists into heaven by judging them according to the Standard of Love, and infuses them with Knowledge (not Faith) of the Apostles’ Creed as they exit Purgatory.

Is that O.K. with you?
I am not sure how this can be possible if there are no second chances after death. Please read the section from Pope John Paul II in Lumen Genteum below, particularly the bolded portion.

"Every trace of attachment to evil must be eliminated, every imperfection of the soul corrected. Purification must be complete, and indeed this is precisely what is meant by the Church’s teaching on purgatory. The term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence. Those who, after death, exist in a state of purification, are already in the love of Christ who removes from them the remnants of imperfection (cf. Ecumenical Council of Florence, Decretum pro Graecis: DS 1304; Ecumenical Council of Trent, Decretum de iustificatione: DS 1580; Decretum de purgatorio: DS 1820).
**It is necessary to explain that the state of purification is not a prolungation of the earthly condition, almost as if after death one were given another possibility to change one’s destiny. The Church’s teaching in this regard is unequivocal and was reaffirmed by the Second Vatican Council which teaches: "Since we know neither the day nor the hour, we should follow the advice of the Lord and watch constantly so that, when the single course of our earthly life is completed (cf. Heb 9: 27), we may merit to enter with him into the marriage feast and be numbered among the blessed, and not, like the wicked and slothful servants, be ordered to depart into the eternal fire, into the outer darkness where “men will weep and gnash their teeth’ **(Mt 22: 13 and 25: 30)” (Lumen gentium, n. 48).
 
I’m sorry, I think you have good intentions in here, but having now caught up on reading the rest of this thread I have to say that many of the things youre saying in here are not consistent with Catholic teaching.

That being said, this thread has gone a little crazy, and I think I’m going to bow out now. Hope you all enjoy the rest of the discussion 🙂
This is, after all, a discussion forum. If you hold, as you said, that many or even any of the things I’ve said are inconsistent with Catholic teaching, then in accordance with the fact that this is in fact a discussion forum it seems you have two options: Either keep it to yourself, or back it up with facts. Just saying that you hold me to be a heretic but failing to present me with the facts constituting your proof of that, is not acceptable. It is like hitting someone and then running away.

I am going to start up a new thread in the Philosophy Forum which will be titled, “All you Need is Love.” Watch for it, and join, if you like.

Peace!
 
I am not sure how this can be possible if there are no second chances after death. Please read the section from Pope John Paul II in Lumen Genteum below, particularly the bolded portion.

"Every trace of attachment to evil must be eliminated, every imperfection of the soul corrected. Purification must be complete, and indeed this is precisely what is meant by the Church’s teaching on purgatory. The term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence. Those who, after death, exist in a state of purification, are already in the love of Christ who removes from them the remnants of imperfection (cf. Ecumenical Council of Florence, Decretum pro Graecis: DS 1304; Ecumenical Council of Trent, Decretum de iustificatione: DS 1580; Decretum de purgatorio: DS 1820).
**It is necessary to explain that the state of purification is not a prolungation of the earthly condition, almost as if after death one were given another possibility to change one’s destiny. The Church’s teaching in this regard is unequivocal and was reaffirmed by the Second Vatican Council which teaches: "Since we know neither the day nor the hour, we should follow the advice of the Lord and watch constantly so that, when the single course of our earthly life is completed (cf. Heb 9: 27), we may merit to enter with him into the marriage feast and be numbered among the blessed, and not, like the wicked and slothful servants, be ordered to depart into the eternal fire, into the outer darkness where “men will weep and gnash their teeth’ **(Mt 22: 13 and 25: 30)” (Lumen gentium, n. 48).
I think this is more appropriate to the new thread I will be starting in the Philosophy Forum with the subject, “All you Need is Love.” Watch for it, and kindly join me there. Thanks!
 
This is completely erroneous theology and not Catholic teaching.

Please show me the catechism reference that says "Good works apart from God Merits Salvation. "

What is the greatest commandment? Love God!

“Since Jesus established the Catholic Church as necessary for salvation, those who knowingly and willingly reject him or his Church cannot be saved. We see this in Jesus’ teaching: “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters” (Mt 12:30). Also: “*f he [a sinning brother] refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector” (Mt 18:17). Paul warned similarly: “As for a man who is factious, after admonishing him once or twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is perverted and sinful; he is self-condemned” (Ti 3:10-11).”

You make a good observation that if this doctrine espoused by Love4all is true, then there is no need for the church. That PROVES it is false.*

There is no such thing as a good work apart from God. God alone is good.

You, too, are invited to confront me on the new thread I have been promising. I’ll get to it. Things I wished to reply to in this thread are still waiting me on other tabs. (Gotta love Firefox 😃 )
 
I believe Mike was responding to Love4All. Afterall he/she even made this statement to one of my posts!!!
40.png
Love4All:
Doing good is more important than believing in God.
:bigyikes: Thank you, but my faith is my greatest treasure. You make it sound as if the Church is irrelevant.
I am glad to see it shocks you. The Holy Father’s words were shocking in exactly the same way.

My Teaching is in union with the Holy Father. I am happy to know that you treasure the Catholic Faith. So do I.

I maintain that it is Catholic Doctrine that,

“Doing good is more important than believing in God.”

I do both, and hopefully so do you, but, if I had to choose, I would have to choose doing good, and I hope you would, too. Yes, Faith is a treasure, that comes from Love, but Faith is no way superior to Love. Love, is Supreme.
 
Well I see you state that “Love” is your religion, so for the clarification of muddle-minded Catholics this needs to be said:

The grace necessary for salvation continues to come from Christ, through his Church. Those who innocently do not know and embrace this might still attain salvation but those who knowingly and willingly choose to reject it, reject salvation on God’s terms.
~Catholic Answers Apologist ~
Is there a difference between knowing the Church teaches this and someone actually believing or accepting this teaching? Because I think many people who know about Catholicism know the Church teaches this. But do not embrace the teaching. So they can still attain salvation even though they know this is teaching but do not embrace it?
 
To simplify and to answer your lead question,

“Did he say they are on the right path?”

Yes. Yes he did. He said that if they are on the path of Charity, they are on the right path, because the whole path is Charity, and there can be no other. He said that we would meet on the Path of Charity, and take it from there.
Is this the Huffington Post version? The original posted on Vatican Radio says this:

The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone! And this Blood makes us children of God of the first class! We are created children in the likeness of God and the Blood of Christ has redeemed us all! And we all have a duty to do good. And this commandment for everyone to do good, I think, is a beautiful path towards peace. If we, each doing our own part, if we do good to others, if we meet there, doing good, and we go slowly, gently, little by little, we will make that culture of encounter: we need that so much. We must meet one another doing good. ‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’ But do good: we will meet one another there.”

en.radiovaticana.va/news/2013/05/22/pope_at_mass:_culture_of_encounter_is_the_foundation_of_peace/en1-694445

I think you have elaborated a bit beyond what he really said. We need to be careful not to insert meanings beyond that which he stated.
 
Is there a difference between knowing the Church teaches this and someone actually believing or accepting this teaching? Because I think many people who know about Catholicism know the Church teaches this. But do not embrace the teaching. So they can still attain salvation even though they know this is teaching but do not embrace it?
Nailed it! Of course not!👍
 
Hi boys n’ girls.
Just subbin’ for Tom, whom I’m sure has better things to do with his time.
Come to think it, so have I.
Thread pruned.
I HIGHLY suggest we post according to Tom’s and CAF’s rules.
If you can’t say something nice, than don’t say anything.
It’s a nice day, go out and get some fresh air.
Or else we shall make Mr. Moderator very cross.
Have a nice day.
 
Hi boys n’ girls.
Just subbin’ for Tom, whom I’m sure has better things to do with his time.
Come to think it, so have I.
Thread pruned.
I HIGHLY suggest we post according to Tom’s and CAF’s rules.
If you can’t say something nice, than don’t say anything.
It’s a nice day, go out and get some fresh air.

Or else we shall make Mr. Moderator very cross.
Have a nice day.
I did go outside. I pulled weeds. My back aches now. And I pulled a muscle in my neck. Or something.

:o
 
I will disagree. I think this discussion about trust is the heart of the matter in this thread.

If I will first trust, rather than doubt and search for problems, then I can begin to know Christ more fully and the teaching of the Church more fully. Trust opens me up to what the Church is saying, or scripture is saying, or the Pope himself. Trust allows me to drop my own personal filter and listen with the understanding of the Church, give my assent, and if I need to understand more fully, pray and reflect.

If there is no trust, there can’t be understanding in matters of faith.
So it appears that the answer I gave you has gone by the wayside? It looks like you ignored it by not even quoting it. As a result, it seems to me that your main objective is to continue to tell me and others that our lack of trust is the issue. After I’ve been very trusting and very reflective for quite some time, I would argue that you are wrong in your conclusion. But it’s clear to me that my questioning must be “my problem” to others here.

Wrt your comment that this topic is relevant to the OP : If so, then I would argue that most of what was talked about in this thread was relevant because it all stemmed from/related to the OP. Your question seems to be a general one and therefore if you are truly looking for a discussion about faith and trust then I still suggest your starting a new thread rather than focusing on getting a response from me.
 
Lucky, I’ve been where it sounds like you are.
Its like I have to keep analyzing and anylizing and anilyzing trying to make sense of things and all I do is get all knoted up and then nothing makes sense any more. Much like this thread. I have found that the only way I can finally start making sense of things is when I let it go and take it to Jesus and His Mother Mary in Silent Prayer.

Maria Christie posted this prayer by Pope Francis’ in the Spirituality forum.

My prayers are with you and I do hope and pray that the healing and understanding and peace that only Jesus can give will be yours and other who are have the same dificulties you are experiencing. Please keep me in yours
Thank you for your kind words and concern. It’s funny that you mentioned Mary. I plan on reciting at least part of the Rosary. … and I plan on keeping the whole of CAF in those prayers.
 
Thank you for your kind words and concern. It’s funny that you mentioned Mary. I plan on reciting at least part of the Rosary. … and I plan on keeping the whole of CAF in those prayers.
Thank you very much. I need them. Bad.
 
MODERATOR NOTICE

The Holy Father is NOT
  1. A child
  2. An ignorant man
  3. A heretic
  4. Our employee
  5. Our subordinate
  6. Our student
The Holy Father has the right to
  1. Preach
  2. Use language that he finds effective for the audience
  3. Ignore what you and I think about his sermon
  4. Be respected as any other priest is respected
There will always be
  1. Confusion
  2. Misinterpretation
  3. Misrepresentation
Even if the Holy Father said that 2 + 2 still equals 4

Therefore, limit your discussion to asking and answering questions about the sermon, not questioning the pope, attempting to tell the world what you think he should have said and how he should have said, and without second guessing the man.

If you can’t do that, please do not post on this thread or you will be permanently banned and the thread may be closed.

No more warnings.

People want to read threads where they find answers, not where they find people attacking each other.
 
Doing good is more important than believing in God. Pope Francis got it right.
Love4All is not banned, but for the rest of the folks out there. We don’t believe that doing good is separate from God. As scripture says, only God is good. So any time someone does good, it is by the Holy Spirit in them, even if that person is an atheist. That doesn’t mean that doing good is more important than believing in God, but by saying that atheists can do good means that God can work through anyone and that because God can work through anyone, salvation is possible for everyone.
 
Love4All is not banned, but for the rest of the folks out there. We don’t believe that doing good is separate from God. As scripture says, only God is good. So any time someone does good, it is by the Holy Spirit in them, even if that person is an atheist. That doesn’t mean that doing good is more important than believing in God, but by saying that atheists can do good means that God can work through anyone and that because God can work through anyone, salvation is possible for everyone.
Love4all did get banned so we could not continue our conversation. I do agree with what you wrote. I think Love4all had a very liberal view of invincible ignorance since she pretty much claimed that everyone outside the church is invincibly ignorant. I just have a very hard time accepting that, when so many atheists I know don’t just say there is no God, but they wave their fist at him snd denounce him.

One thing I was going to ask Love4all was what is love?

And can the self sacrificing love required of us really be performed without a love for God?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top