N
netmilsmom
Guest
Spot on!Our “pluralistic” Church? What is that supposed to mean?
Charity doesn’t translate into soft-headed tolerance.
Now who is challenging integrity?
(she types as she multi-tasks!)
Spot on!Our “pluralistic” Church? What is that supposed to mean?
Charity doesn’t translate into soft-headed tolerance.
Now who is challenging integrity?
I’m not. But your accusation that I am is, in and of itself, uncharitable.Why would you respond in such an uncharitable way?
If the shoe fits…I’m not. But your accusation that I am is, in and of itself, uncharitable. Please don’t call names.
To be honest, this is actually mild compared to what I’ve seen on another forum. I think I’ve been accused of all the “ism”No kidding, I’m new and I can see that you put up with a lot of abuse on this forum.
Interesting because you seem to have a sincere love of your faith and a genuine involvement with your own church.
I know that you’re tough and you can handle it and you’re smart so you always trounce their arguments but it’s just too sad that people come here to fight and patronize and criticize instead of pulling together.
This was uncharitable.IAnd why are all these married women and mothers on the computer so much anyway? Who is taking care of their homes?
Haven’t you read the title of this thread?WHAT???
I can’t believe that you would come to a Catholic forum and write such a thing!
Where is your charity and who are YOU to call someone a lost soul?
You don’t seem to mind playing the martyr.These same folks believe they score much higher and use it as a cudgil for all us lesser Catholics.
If you remember, I actually said I can’t blame you for being upset over the backward comment. I’m sorry but the way you were going on about your parish, it did seem like a perfect parish. I haven’t found a perfect parish myself, but I’m glad you have.Oh but calling traditional thinking “backward” and sarcastically calling a parish “your perfect parish’” is just your opinion, right?![]()
naww not playing the martyr just the minorityYou don’t seem to mind playing the martyr.
Which, is in this case, is different in what regard?naww not playing the martyr just the minority
lol, my house is a mess today. I must admit this.I am a Catholic and I am a Democrat. If you dare to challenge my integrity as a Catholic you’d be in big trouble.
Many of the Catholics who are also Republican would make great Fundamentalists, THEY are the ones who are trying to ruin our pluralistic
church, not me.
They actually focus more on Abortion than on helping the mothers who might abort, they hate the idea of Gay unions even though no one believes that the church should be forced to perform Gay marriages.
And the lack of charity towards people who disagree with them is astonishing!
Isn’t a sin against charity even worse than a sin against sexual intemperance?
Isn’t the greatest of these…CHARITY?
There are people on this site who lack charity and who are proud of it so they lack humility as well.
And why are all these married women and mothers on the computer so much anyway? Who is taking care of their homes?
She called your statement uncharitable, not you.I’m not. But your accusation that I am is, in and of itself, uncharitable.
Please don’t call names.
She, if you meant me, is a he!She called your statement uncharitable, not you.
Perhaps if you were not looking to be offended, you wouldn’t be.
A wise bromide, I must say. Let us remember it when the all the fine pickers find their little liturgical “abusive” nits.Perhaps if you were not looking to be offended, you wouldn’t be.
Sorry, but your arguments are all over the place and lack cohesion.Obviously you didn’t read my post, begining with “Out of charity…”
Our “pluralistic” Church? What is that supposed to mean?
Charity doesn’t translate into soft-headed tolerance.
Now who is challenging integrity?
I must admit that when I read your post as it was, referencing Karianne’s comment, I too thought it was rather harsh. However, when I went to the original post and read that line in context I could see that it was clearly meant satirically. To take it out of it’s original context for the purpose of unjustly chasting the poster shows either a) ignorance of the use of sarcasm and satire in the original post or b) someone is simply gunning for Karianne and will twist her words against her. Talk about uncharitable!This was uncharitable.
Oh really, and you can be the judge of when I should be offended?She called your statement uncharitable, not you.
Perhaps if you were not looking to be offended, you wouldn’t be.
Well saints preserve us!She, if you meant me, is a he!![]()
Only because I am responding to arguments that are all over the place.Sorry, but your arguments are all over the place and lack cohesion.
Fine, but you are the one that seems to think they need to come in shootin’ and paint the town red.We need to just agree to disagree.
this is getting rather silly.She called your statement uncharitable, not you.
Perhaps if you were not looking to be offended, you wouldn’t be.