O
O.S.Luke
Guest
Luther never said the word “consubstantiation.” It is also interesting to note that the Eastern Orthodox no longer use the word “transubstantiation.”
It is a difference between Western and Eastern thought.
Byzantines never dealt with the concept of ‘essence’ in the context of Eucharist (the Greek word would be ousia, I think). Thus, a concept would like transubstantiation (Gr: metousiosis - note the deriviative) would make no sense when speaking about a sacramental mystery. The concept of metabole is embraced, however. To be honest, terms like ‘trans-elementation’ (Gk: metastoicheiosis) or ‘re-ordination’ (Gk: metarrhythmisis) make much more sense when talking about matters involving mystery.
Catholic (and Western) scholar Edward Schillebeeckx may have coined an even better term: transsignification.
Western philosophy is just a poor discipline to characterize the Eucharist. I don’t see how you can use Thomism/Aristotelianism to explain a mystery!
O+
It is a difference between Western and Eastern thought.
Byzantines never dealt with the concept of ‘essence’ in the context of Eucharist (the Greek word would be ousia, I think). Thus, a concept would like transubstantiation (Gr: metousiosis - note the deriviative) would make no sense when speaking about a sacramental mystery. The concept of metabole is embraced, however. To be honest, terms like ‘trans-elementation’ (Gk: metastoicheiosis) or ‘re-ordination’ (Gk: metarrhythmisis) make much more sense when talking about matters involving mystery.
Catholic (and Western) scholar Edward Schillebeeckx may have coined an even better term: transsignification.
Western philosophy is just a poor discipline to characterize the Eucharist. I don’t see how you can use Thomism/Aristotelianism to explain a mystery!
O+
I love being at Mass! And Mass is worth everything, including my life!