L
the danger is when you put theology to a vote.The title itself sounds like yet another disingenuous progressive hit-piece on what is considered to be a more orthodox Protestant Church.
He would probably be too in awe of cell phones and airplanes and modern medicine to care.I wonder what John Wesley would have thought of all this…![]()
I agree.It’s nice being Catholic- where morality isn’t decided by popular vote.
Really though, I’m glad that I’m not part of a mainline Protestant church, where this issue has consumed them and caused so many divisions and strife over the past couple of decades.
Perhaps, but with his solidly Arminian theology, he’d certainly be concerned about those favouring the practice of sexual sins.He would probably be too in awe of cell phones and airplanes and modern medicine to care.
You don’t think the issue of sexuality hasn’t impacted the RCC? Goodness.Really though, I’m glad that I’m not part of a mainline Protestant church, where this issue has consumed them and caused so many divisions and strife over the past couple of decades.
Of course it has. But the “RCC”*, having solid teachings and dogmas, doesn’t need to conduct a yearly democratic debate on whether homosexual acts are sinful or not. The teaching is set in stone. Even the much-misrepresented and overhyped “Synod on the Family” could only make pastoral recommendations.You don’t think the issue of sexuality hasn’t impacted the RCC? Goodness.
So you and your membership and clergy alike are dealing with it in a different way than branches of the the Church that discuss and make decisions together based on prayer and the leading of the Holy Spirit. (BTW, the Methodist General Conference meets once every four years, not yearly.)Of course it has. But the “RCC”*, having solid teachings and dogmas, doesn’t need to conduct a yearly democratic debate on whether homosexual acts are sinful or not. The teaching is set in stone. Even the much-misrepresented and overhyped “Synod on the Family” could only make pastoral recommendations.![]()
There is absolutely no question that most of the defense of so-called gay “marriage” on the internet is from straights who are looking to make a name for themselves and score tolerance points and not GLBTQ folks. For one thing, there aren’t enough of them and secondly, GLBTQ folks are actually more civil to me on-line about the marriage issue than straights have been.So you and your membership and clergy alike are dealing with it in a different way than branches of the the Church that discuss and make decisions together based on prayer and the leading of the Holy Spirit. (BTW, the Methodist General Conference meets once every four years, not yearly.)
Look through the threads here on CAF. I wonder what the percentage of posts are that have something to do with homosexuality - usually by people who are NOT homosexual. My gay clergy friends and colleagues - both Anglican and Roman - don’t talk about it much at all. It’s just a normal part of who they are. I feel badly for the Methodist clergy who have had to be in ministry whilst keeping an important part of themselves very quiet.
Exactly. The beauty of Catholicism is that one doesn’t have to reinvent the wheel; it’s already ready and waiting for you in perfect condition.So you and your membership and clergy alike are dealing with it in a different way than branches of the the Church that discuss and make decisions together based on prayer and the leading of the Holy Spirit. (BTW, the Methodist General Conference meets once every four years, not yearly.)
Now this is something that I have mixed feelings about.Look through the threads here on CAF. I wonder what the percentage of posts are that have something to do with homosexuality - usually by people who are NOT homosexual.
Well, perhaps that’s why the Church teaches that those with “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” shouldn’t become clergy in the first place.My gay clergy friends and colleagues - both Anglican and Roman - don’t talk about it much at all. It’s just a normal part of who they are. I feel badly for the Methodist clergy who have had to be in ministry whilst keeping an important part of themselves very quiet. What’s good about this GC is that people are stepping forward. That is always a good sign. I hope it makes a difference this year.
Yes, please pray for us and I mean that with all my heart.Just imagine what it must be like for faithful Methodist ministers, worried that if the vote goes the wrong way, they will either have to be untrue to their consciences or lose their jobs.
Praying for them…
–Jen
P.S. There’s surely no doubt of the opinion of the author of that terrible article!
It may have impacted the people but it will never impact the teachings of the Catholic Church. Christ promised his Church would NEVER teach error. I trust the Holy Spirit! God Bless, MemawYou don’t think the issue of sexuality hasn’t impacted the RCC? Goodness.
In my country it is the Anglican Church which actively openly promotes the issue against the Catholic Church. The Anglican Church is also the fastest declining denomination in my country.You don’t think the issue of sexuality hasn’t impacted the RCC? Goodness.
AmenJust imagine what it must be like for faithful Methodist ministers, worried that if the vote goes the wrong way, they will either have to be untrue to their consciences or lose their jobs.
Praying for them…
–Jen