The Missing Passover

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Steve:

I’m not really sure why you posted the verses you did regarding Jesus. It seemed to open up a whole new topic.
Prodigal Child-It does get hard to keep track of all the arguments within a thread, doesn’t it? 🙂 My original post (#438) was in response to Ben’s claim that Jesus didn’t teach the resurrection and (by implication) that Jesus wasn’t divine. Accordingly, I brought out evidence that Jesus both claimed divine status and that teachings regarding the resurrection can be traced to as early as the late 30’s in Jerusalem. You then effectively attacked one of the eight prongs of my Jesus’ claims to divinity argument. Grace, in post #472, then raised the issue of the virgin birth of Jesus. However, I believe she mistakenly added that to the list of arguments concerning Jesus’ claim to divinity, where I believe it doesn’t belong. I replied back with my list of prophetic fulfillments, where I believe Grace’s point about the virgin birth should be placed. So although my arguments haven’t responded to the topic of the thread, i.e., the Missing Passover, they have responded to various issues raised by various people on the thread.
If you don’t mind, I’ll respond to the remainder of your posting later, as I have to get ready for work.

Regards,
SteveLohr

(PS-I just noticed your post 478-I’ll also address that later today.)
 
Oh but I did believe the New Testament for over 45 years. You are having great difficulty coming to terms with the idea that someone could really and truly be a Christian and just have their faith fall apart. If you want the bare bones of what happened, I’ll give you that, but I’m most certainly not going to go into detail. You want to know why? Because I don’t care to undermine your faith. Your journey is your journey. But I can tell you that I am not unusual at all. The classes that I take at my synagogue are absolutely FULL of people like me who spent their lives loving Jesus, only to find to their bewilderment that Jesus wasn’t God or messiah after all, but the God they loved and served was still there, and was still Lord and Master and Savior, baruch Hashem.
Actually no, it’s not surprising to me that a Catholic becomes something else, falls away. Some “minimalise” into becoming protestants, others find the law-structure they think they need in Islam, some others become Jewish. The similarity is that they dont feel filled up where they are… somehow. And so they long for something deeper, something more to get closer to the unseen God. Unfortunately I think many Catholic parishes are experts in creating apostates because of the tepidity and the lack of Holy Spirit work in our assemblies.
I will admit I have ever only met one who became a believer in rabbinical Judaism. This was a German woman who had had no previous personal relationship with Jesus, she was only nominal Christian and her reasons for wanting to join Judaism were mainly cultural fascination.
I have lived in the Holy Land (Jerusalem) for an extensive time and also talked alot about religion with people there. I do admire and respect Judaism deeply. Why would I not, its the faith of our fathers, and Christ is the fulfilment and continuation of that faith.
But its a stinging feeling for me… of course, to see a brother fall away. Its stinging in all of the Body.
I have met quite a few messianic Jews… Jews that believe Yeshua is Messiah… also people who used to believe that Christianity was paganism and to become a Jesus-believer would be to betray their own people. Thorough studies and prayer led them to Jesus.
I see you are not answering what you might do with the links and books I recommended. if you were indeed a firm Christian then you must have already heard and witnessed thousands testimonies about lives changed through Christ. So why not listen to some postmodern Jews who became messianic through divine intervention? You are not afraid, are you? I hope you are not…
You say you dont want to harm my way. Come on… you cannot actually think its worthwhile for me to base my life on a lie. Is that judaism, to think so? My life is Christ, He is the Loving Face of God, the Manna that came down onto my desert. If my life is thus a joke, dont you think it would serve me to know this?
I have sought Truth and He revealed Himself to me. He has answered everything… and I dont mean just in academic/intellectual sense (which He does, but that is the lesser) but through transforming my life and that I /we actually experience Him. I think this is often missing in many Catholic churches why I fear you have become a believer, at any rate, by head instead of by experience.
But… Please do save me from error. Maybe God sent you to me, since I always pray “Father, Your will be done”. Untill now He has been abundantly willing to tell me very clearly what He means about many things. Besides His communication, I have felt the power of His Spirit, I have more people in my near friendsgroup than I can count, who have seen Christ, actually seen Him (Even one dear lady died and went to heaven and met him and she was resucitated). I know numerous people who have seen the mother of Jesus and angels. Numerous who have been healed… I even met people who were healed from cancer in the last stage in the Name of Jesus.
When I became a believer a few years ago after having been a walking dead all my life of being a nominal Christian, Scripture now opened itself to me. I could read it… It became my food, regenerated life in me as a personal love letter does. the Holy Spirit explained things to me that I never understood and all things fell into place. I have a new identity. I have come to know Love and beauty and in Him I have my identity. Kol akavod.
So please, do share with me your testimony without being condescending. I would love to hear it. Challenge us all… dont leave us in the dark if you truly believe we are in error.
Again I urge you:
salvationisfromthejews.com/audioconverts.html

Baruch Hashem.
Peace.
 
I believe most scholars date the crucifixion as occuring in 32 or 33 AD, with 33 AD seeming to have the majority of support. As you state, no one is sure of the exact date.

Regards,
Steve
**And I think those scholars are confusing the year with the age of Jesus. Jesus was 30 years old when he got immersed by John the Baptist in the Jordan River in the year 27 CE and was crucified in the year 30 CE when he was 33 and half years old. **
 
Actually this phrase Ben-Adam is evidence to the contrary, evidence that Jesus is mortal rather than divine. That is what the phrase son of man MEANS – that one is mortal. Further, it references up against Numbers 23:19
“God is not a man that he can lie, nor a son of man that he can repent”

The phrase “son of man” is most often paired in a double turn of phrase " blah blah man, or blhablahblah son of man blah blah blah,"

In Ezekial, God addresses Ezekial as son of man.

The most interesting use of the phrase is in the book of Daniel. Each of the different pagan nations is seen rising as a different horrible beast of some sort. Suddenly, one “like a son of man” is seen coming out of the clouds. What nation could that possibly be that is different from all the other nations? Well, Israel of course!

Prodigal Child-
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Life is interfering with my posting. 😉 I’m going to address your first argument now, and I’ll get back to you on your others, as I have limitted time tonight.

I’m not sure I agree with you here. For starters, Jesus clearly was using the phrase “the Son of Man” in a divine context. For instance Jesus Jesus said, ‘But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.’ He said to the paralytic, ‘I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home’ ” (Mark 2:10–11). Here, Jesus is himself clearly forgiving sins. This is a divine progative, and beyond the capability of any mere man. His use of “the Son of Man” in association with this act shows that He intended the two concepts to go hand-in-hand.

Likewise, I disagree with your contention that that the term “Son of Man” means a nation, and not an individual. Jesus certainly intended it to mean Himself. See Matt. 24: 37-38, where Jesus states: “As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. *See also *Matt 12:40. Regardless of whether you believe Jesus in fact said these things, (which I believe He did), the simple fact is that to a 1st century Jewish audience the gospel writer were addressing, these statements would have no meaning if the phrase “son of man” meant the Jewish people collectively.

Further, in the old testament the phrase “son of man” is used without the article “the.“ In contrast, Jesus clearly uses the difinitive expression “The Son of Man,” (emphasis added) in contrast to the old testament expression “son of man.” Thus, in context it appears that the old testament writers intended “son of man” to mean simply a human being, while Jesus intended to imbue the term “the Son of Man” with a deeper meaning.

I also disagree with your understanding of Daniel 7:13. This passage reads:
**“In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all peoples, nations and men of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.” **

This passage clearly indicates a single Messiah, not a collective Messiah. Further, there is no indication from this passage that it is refering to a “nation.” Although the angel does identify the four beasts as being nations in verse 17, the angel never applies that meaning to the “one” who is like “a son of man.” Therefore, by the plain language of the text we must presume that this is an individual, and not a nation. The Jews never considered themselves to be this individual, as they would have meant that they were to be worshipped. (Dan 13:14).

I’ll respond to your other points in a later post

Regards,
SteveLohr
 
I have known God personally for a very very long time. And for a long time I mistakenly called him Jesus. Baruch Hashem he does not hold that old confusion against me. Nor do I hold yours against you. Be well.
**Hi Prodigal Child, what kind of nostalgia makes you stop by this forum? Would you share with us what makes you miss in Catholicism that you don’t have among the Jews? 45 years is a long time to have acquired something to say. **
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top