H
hosemonkey
Guest
I love it! She looks like your mama.You deserve a suitable avatar. I think that this will do you proud:
http://thewookiee.com/uploaded_images/monkey sitting in ubud bali-781420.JPG
zerinus
I love it! She looks like your mama.You deserve a suitable avatar. I think that this will do you proud:
http://thewookiee.com/uploaded_images/monkey sitting in ubud bali-781420.JPG
zerinus
:doh2:I love it! She looks like your mama.
It is my understanding of LDS doctrine—which is as good as anybody else’s.Thanks, Zerinus. I may have a few questions for you on this later, once I’ve got a chance to read thru it. Is this your own synopsis? Or is it taken from another source?
One thing that catches my eye is the clip just above, where you say that one unforgiveable sin is murder. According to the Encyclopedia of Mormonism article under the heading “Telestial Kingdom” it says the following:
““Within the telestial glory there will be varying degrees of glory even as the stars vary in brightness as we see them. It embraces those who on earth willfully reject the gospel of Jesus Christ, and commit serious sins such as murder, adultery””…an so on.
In every religion there areas of theology that are controversial, about which it is possible to have more than one opinion. My understanding of LDS doctrine is that premeditated murder is unpardonable (see D&C 42:79). Others may justifiably disagree. Bear in mind that there are different kinds of murder. Not all murders are of equal severity in the sight of God. Maybe that is what they have in mind.If this be accurate, then it seems as if this disagrees with what you say about Murder being an unforgiveable sin in terms of everlasting perdition.
You would have to ask that question from the author of that article. I am not responsible for what other people write, nor feel obliged to defend or explain them, nor am I bound by what they have said. I derive my understanding of LDS doctrine directly from the standard works of the LDS Church; and that is the only source of LDS theology and doctrine that I would feel obliged to defend or explain.Also, I wonder about the “willfully reject the gospel of Jesus Christ” part. Does this refer specifically to the Mormon version of the gospel? If it does, then it would seem that anyone who rejects Mormonism is consigned by definition to no higher than the telestial kingdom.
Well…at least you are being truthful by implying that Mormonism is not Christian.
Exactly. I do believe you just preached to the choir, ZerinusLDS is not apostate. Christianity is.
zerinus
But she didn’t choose the namesake, you did!I love it! She looks like your mama.
I’ve found your avatar, Zerinus! You are second from the right. Smile!But she didn’t choose the namesake, you did!
zerinus
Mocking = Not Christian“but…but he said we were going to hell” boo hoo! Cry me a river!![]()
In my opinion, you have not targeted several of my posts in the spirit of loving, Christian guidance, but to distract from the discussion that had begun about Kolob and spirit babies and becoming gods which are Mormon beliefs. If you had genuinely been interested in my tone in my posts, you would have privately contacted me. The agenda of distraction is clear.rude is rude, sorry no excuse.
Can you please define what you mean by “integration tactics”?I don’t know why people can’t just simply say… oh I’m sorry you believe we are going to hell… we don’t believe this and here’s why and then just have an exchange! What’s with all the integration tactics?
I don’t have this lackadaisical attitude toward the false prophet, Joseph Smith which you are describing yourself as having, this is true.I am fully aware that Mormons do believe they are the true Church and it’s been explained to me and I’ve watched several programs on what they believe. So what. We believe we are as well. I guess we have to live at this impasse. :hug1:![]()
I’m still trying to understand what you mean by “all the integration tactics” that I and others on this thread are being accused of.What’s with all the integration tactics?
Astute observation. I believe that mormonism has much in common with mohammedanism, especially in it’s position vis a vis women. Women are certainly subordinate to men, secret names and all that fol-de-rol. Women’s role seems to be to produce endless spirit babies while their husbands cavort with their other ‘spiritual’ wives. Their theology in regard to women seems tied to the 19th century. Joe Smith’s wife opposed him bitterly with regard to polygamy, but the polygamy doctrine was’nt for women, certainly, but the guys had a lot of fun with it.The Mormon religion appears to be designed to appeal to the male ego. I see nothing in it for women. They seem to prefer men and younger boys in their evangelization.
A personal relationship with God who is intimately involved with each and every detail of our life is so much more appealing in every way over this hodge podge that is Mormonism. I cannot see what anyone, save an egotistical male, sees in it. Can anyone explain?
May have been a type for “interogation”.I’m still trying to understand what you mean by “all the integration tactics” that I and others on this thread are being accused of.
In fact, if a woman wants to be saved, she has to be “celestially married” to a holder of the priesthood. The women get secret names in the eternal marriage ceremony, so their husbands can call them to “the other side” after death.Astute observation. I believe that mormonism has much in common with mohammedanism, especially in it’s position vis a vis women. Women are certainly subordinate to men, secret names and all that fol-de-rol. Women’s role seems to be to produce endless spirit babies while their husbands cavort with their other ‘spiritual’ wives. Their theology in regard to women seems tied to the 19th century. Joe Smith’s wife opposed him bitterly with regard to polygamy, but the polygamy doctrine was’nt for women, certainly, but the guys had a lot of fun with it.![]()
AH! Could be. Although I don’t get why “interrogation tactics” would upset anyone. Interrogate me about Catholicism… please!!!May have been a type for “interogation”.
zerinus
Over to you, Zerinus.In fact, if a woman wants to be saved, she has to be “celestially married” to a holder of the priesthood. The women get secret names in the eternal marriage ceremony, so their husbands can call them to “the other side” after death.
Mary Ettie Smith, a Mormon woman who left the church and Utah in 1856, said that "women do not amount to much in themselves," and that women in those times were often celestially married to men they had no intention of ever living with, so that they could have a man who would be able to get them into heaven (Green 154).
Then, of course, the women bear “spirit children” for eternity, while their husbands create and rule over planets.
I don’t think it was the “interogation” that she was unhappy about, but the “tactics”.AH! Could be. Although I don’t get why “interrogation tactics” would upset anyone. Interrogate me about Catholicism… please!!!![]()
Ohhh!!! :doh2: Those interrogation tactics. So, she’s upset that we used waterboarding and stress positions to get more information from you about Kolob?I don’t think it was the “interogation” that she was unhappy about, but the “tactics”.
zerinus
Mocking = Not Christian