The Mother of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Mickey:
I would also like to apologize personally to EA_Man for uncharitable remarks I made. I truly believe that we are all brothers and sisters in Christ.

GLORY TO JESUS CHRIST!
GLORY FOREVER!

smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/8/8_3_15.gif
Amen!
 
Here is an interesting twist to the topic. I am qouting my own statements from the ***Only Catholics Pray the Hail Mary ***thread.

*Here it is: *

*http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon1.gif Re: Only Catholics pray the Hail Mary? *
*Here is my two cents on this matter? Does anyone one of you know of a Protestant or any non-Catholic who is or was a member of a Choir? Ask them if they ever sang Ave, Maria? If the answer is yes, Catholics are not the only ones praying (or should I say singing) the Hail Mary. *

Just an interesting thought I think you might find interesting*.*
 
Quote:
The motto of Catholicism is vox populi vox Dei (the voice of the people is the voice of God).
April_hosen

I am not asking this in a sarcastic way, but where did you get this? I have never heard or read this before. I have been Catholic for 30 yrs but have never heard this, who coined the phrase?

I have always heard "“semper idem” (always the same).

I could be wrong, although I have been Catholic all my life, I am always learning something new. It doesn’t sound right to me, a little too democratic, so I am curious where the quote came from and what context it was in.
Thanks,
Peace
 
40.png
EA_Man:
I wanted to apologize to everyone on this thread for being sarcastic.

I’m sorry.🙂

I’ll try to keep in mind that we are all one in Jesus Christ.
Most of us have had weak moments on this site at one time or another, you are forgiven! Thanks.

We forgive Mickey too.

Mary is our Blessed Mother because she chose to be the Mother of God when she was called, so because we have new life in Christ by His redemption, she was also giving birth to us spiritually, by being the mother of the Redeemer she was becoming the spiritual mother to all who were and are redeemed.

You know the old “your momma” jokes, well the Catholic boy gets mad when his momma is dissed, (I mean this to be humerous)
 
40.png
Peace-bwu:
Most of us have had weak moments on this site at one time or another, you are forgiven! Thanks.

We forgive Mickey too.

Mary is our Blessed Mother because she chose to be the Mother of God when she was called, so because we have new life in Christ by His redemption, she was also giving birth to us spiritually, by being the mother of the Redeemer she was becoming the spiritual mother to all who were and are redeemed.

You know the old “your momma” jokes, well the Catholic boy gets mad when his momma is dissed, (I mean this to be humerous)
While we can disagree as to the appropriate way to honor Mary, I just wanted to be clear that all of the Protestants that I know acknowledge Mary as the first Christian and Blessed among women.

I’ll try to step carefully so as to avoid toes.

Peace
 
First off, I’ll extend the apology if I seemed uncharitable. I really try not to, but sometimes I miss comments that seem more offensive than they mean to be. Sorry for those, and in advance lest I do it again.

Second. I started off my reactions in this thread trying to understand prayer from just ourselves, and then asking others to pray for us. Setting aside for a moment the Heavenly saints, help me understand this, you said earlier that:
40.png
EA_Man:
Why the redundancy of invoking the aid of the saints? Scripture says it isn’t necessary. God hears our petitions
If it is indeed redundant to ask the intercession of the saints, how is is any less redundant to ask other people for their prayers? You might point to where you said:
40.png
EA_Man:
Wherever two or three are gathered in my name…hello?
But, usually, when I ask others for prayers, I don’t stay and pray with them, but trust that they’ll be praying for me any time they stop for prayers. This isn’t particularly two or three gathering in Christ’s name, is it? I mean, I may stay and pray with them, and then that makes sense, but what about all those times when we are not physically together?
So again, genuinely trying to understand your logic, how is asking your friends for help any different than asking the saints for their prayers (in the sense that we are doing more than JUST going to God.)

Ok, back to the debate I started.
40.png
EA_Man:
Have you an actual scripture verse to back up your claim that the saints that have passed on can hear your prayers?
I could ask if you have any scripture verse to back up the claim that they can’t? But then, that would just be avoiding the issue, huh? I’ll scour my Bible for something soon, since as I’ve already said, I’m not as well-versed (no pun intended) in Scripture as I want to be.
40.png
EA_Man:
What’s the CONTEXT? Yeah, like Jesus is talking to John, man. Like Dude, take care of my mother - crazy cool huh?
I don’t know what your position is, but if you hold some of the beliefs other Protestants I’ve talked to (you may feel free to correct me, since I know not all Prostants hold the same interpretation) you may think that Jesus had blood brothers. If you don’t agree with that, then you might agree that Jesus had cousins. If either of these is the case, why would Jesus give his mother to someone who wasn’t even related? The only reasonable answer (that I see) is that Jesus meant more than just giving Mary to John to look after. And even if my logic there falls through there, are we not Jesus’ brothers? Wouldn’t that make Mary our mother, just as it makes God our Father?

I’m sorry if I avoided the issues, I didn’t mean to :o

In the interest of being brothers in Christ, I’ll keep you in my prayers, God bless!
 
The thing that people miss when they downgrade Mary is the fact no one more than Mary, here on earth, suffered Jesus’ agonies along with Him. Mary was not just a vessel through whom the Holy Spirit brought His Son. She raised Jesus and worried about Him in the way only a mother does. Mary accepted the Holy Spirit’s will and allowed herself to suffer alongside His anguishes. Imagine His mother at the foot of His cross and ask yourself, “Is Mary not blessed?”
 
40.png
Palatine:
I don’t know what your position is, but if you hold some of the beliefs other Protestants I’ve talked to (you may feel free to correct me, since I know not all Prostants hold the same interpretation) you may think that Jesus had blood brothers. If you don’t agree with that, then you might agree that Jesus had cousins. If either of these is the case, why would Jesus give his mother to someone who wasn’t even related? The only reasonable answer (that I see) is that Jesus meant more than just giving Mary to John to look after. And even if my logic there falls through there, are we not Jesus’ brothers? Wouldn’t that make Mary our mother, just as it makes God our Father?

In the interest of being brothers in Christ, I’ll keep you in my prayers, God bless!
Yes, you’ve pegged me correctly. I believe that Mary and Joseph had children as a result of natural relations. I’m sorry, that’s as polite as I know how to be and still be exact about it.

As for your question regarding Jesus’ statement to John:

Matthew 12:48-50
He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” The short answer here is that Jesus left His mother in the care of one of His “real” family members, not with one of His earthly family. After all who be more willing to do God’s will?

Careful of overliteralizing here: God is our Father, Jesus is our brother, isn’t Mary our Mother…Are God and Mary married?

God is spirit. He is Divinity. Mary is created. She is of a different order than God.
 
Mary: Our Mother in the Order of Grace

There are many articles about the meaning of Mary as our Mother. I’ve provided one link, but articles are innumerable:

catholicfaithandreason.org/MARY1.HTM

Mary had to be “wholly borne by God’s grace” in order to “give the assent of faith.” She was the mother of God first in her heart, than in her body. Pope John Paul tells us that “this consent to motherhood is above all a result of her total self-giving to God in virginity.” She was, he notes, “guided by spousal love, the love which totally consecrates a human being to God.”
 
While it is possible that Joseph had children before he married Mary, the idea that Mary and Joseph had children together is perpetuated to deny the ever-virginity of Mary.

As Jesus was an only child, he put his mother under the care of the disciple John:

John 19:26-27
When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, “Woman, behold thy son!” Then saith he to the disciple, “Behold thy mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.

“If Jesus had brothers and sisters, there would be no need to put His mother under the care of John. In fact, it would probably be an insult to His siblings. On the other hand, if we assume Jesus had no siblings, the way He provided for the care of His mother makes perfect sense.”

A man named Antoine Valentim has compiled a much longer defense of Mary and her Virginity:

globalserve.net/~bumblebee/ecclesia/brothers.htm
 
40.png
Mickey:
Do you believe that the Virgin Mary is the Mother of God? If not, please explain.
No.

God is self-existing, and He is eternal; He has no mother.
 
40.png
EA_Man:
I believe that Mary and Joseph had children as a result of natural relations.
None of the early reformers believed that. Would you happen to know when this theory first surfaced and by whom? :confused:
 
40.png
sonseeker:
No.

God is self-existing, and He is eternal; He has no mother.
That is the Nestorian heresy. Do a search on the council of Ephesus and read about it. The Word was made flesh. Jesus is God The Son. When the Word became flesh, Mary became Theotokos.🙂
 
40.png
sonseeker:
God is self-existing, and He is eternal; He has no mother.
So, then, Jesus was not conceived in Mary’s womb by the Holy Spirit and born in the normal human fashion? Or is Jesus not God?
 
40.png
sonseeker:
No.

God is self-existing, and He is eternal; He has no mother.
Son, your response reminds me of Catholics who say they don’t believe in the Church’s position on birth control.

The very statement tells me they do not understand the doctrine.

Check out this thread and do a very (very) **little **homework on this questions and you will see that the title “Mother of God” in no way compromises the self-existence or eternity of God. Really.

This is NOT one of the questions that separates Protestants and Catholics. Many Protestant denominations enthusiastically endorse the title “Mother of God” for Our Lady.
 
40.png
JimO:
So, then, Jesus was not conceived in Mary’s womb by the Holy Spirit and born in the normal human fashion? Or is Jesus not God?
Jesus is God; He is self-existing; He is eternal; He has no mother.

This has nothing to do with the Nestorians. You must believe God has a mother, or other of your beliefs cannot stand. I do not have to believe that. Mary is listed as the Mother of Jesus, a singular and unique man. Fully God, fully man. How can Mary be the mother of God who has always existed? It is a mystery to me.

I am answering the question posed at the top of the thread. You don’t have to agree with my answer.

Bill
 
40.png
sonseeker:
Jesus is God; He is self-existing; He is eternal; He has no mother.

This has nothing to do with the Nestorians. You must believe God has a mother. I do not have to believe that. Mary is the Mother of Jesus, a singular and unique man. How can Mary be the mother of God who has always existed?

Bill
You lost me on the Nestorian comment, maybe that was directed to someone else. The problem with the view you expressed is the same problem that led to early misunderstandings in which the two natures of Christ were treated separately. This ultimately led to heresies where people denied Christ’s humanity and others that denied His divinity. The reference to Mary as Mother of God speaks to the dual nature of the God-man Jesus. The two natures cannot be separated and examined independent of one another.

I have found that this is an issue most Protestants don’t have a problem with once there is a thorough examination of it. Many react to it because it appears to elevate Mary to the level of God, which it doesn’t. Many Protestants just react to anything related to Mary because of misperceptions and, frankly, because of the problems created by many Catholics throughout the world who are out of balance when it comes to Mary.
 
40.png
JimO:
You lost me on the Nestorian comment, maybe that was directed to someone else. The problem with the view you expressed is the same problem that led to early misunderstandings in which the two natures of Christ were treated separately. This ultimately led to heresies where people denied Christ’s humanity and others that denied His divinity. The reference to Mary as Mother of God speaks to the dual nature of the God-man Jesus. The two natures cannot be separated and examined independent of one another.

I have found that this is an issue most Protestants don’t have a problem with once there is a thorough examination of it. Many react to it because it appears to elevate Mary to the level of God, which it doesn’t. Many Protestants just react to anything related to Mary because of misperceptions and, frankly, because of the problems created by many Catholics throughout the world who are out of balance when it comes to Mary.
You are right Jim; I believe the Nestorian comment was from a post above yours.

However, may statement has nothing to do with the Nestorians. I am saying that God, who is self-existing, and eternal, cannot have a mother.

“Mother of God,” cannot be found anywhere in the scripture. The only genealogy of Jesus that lists Mary is Matthew’s, and he says “by whom Jesus was born,” NASB and others:

16 and Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
DARBY

16 and Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
ASV

16 ιακωβ δε εγεννησεν τον ιωσηφ τον ανδρα μαριας εξ ης εγεννηθη ιησους ο λεγομενος χριστος
Elzevir

16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.
ESV

16 From the time after the exile in Babylon to the birth of Jesus, the following ancestors are listed: Jehoiachin, Shealtiel, Zerubbabel, Abiud, Eliakim, Azor, Zadok, Achim, Eliud, Eleazar, Matthan, Jacob, and Joseph, who married Mary, the mother of Jesus, who was called the Messiah.
GNT

16 ιακωβ δε εγεννησεν τον ιωσηφ τον ανδρα** μαριας εξ ης εγεννηθη ιησους ο λεγομενος χριστος**
Tisch

My problem with it is that it is not clear thinking. If you would like to explain to me how an eternal existing being can have a mother, I’ll listen.

Bill
 
40.png
mercygate:
Son, your response reminds me of Catholics who say they don’t believe in the Church’s position on birth control.

The very statement tells me they do not understand the doctrine.

Check out this thread and do a very (very) **little **homework on this questions and you will see that the title “Mother of God” in no way compromises the self-existence or eternity of God. Really.

This is NOT one of the questions that separates Protestants and Catholics. Many Protestant denominations enthusiastically endorse the title “Mother of God” for Our Lady.
Actually, I understand the doctrine; I just don’t agree with it.

Respectfully,
Bill
 
40.png
Zooey:
Most non-Catholic Christians seem to be allergic to this title…I have never seen any problem with it. If one accepts the fact of the Incarnation, if one believes that Jesus Christ was God the Son in human form, then Mary is the Mother of God.
Now, I can understand that for those who do not believe in the Deity of Christ, there is a big problem here. But once we cross from there into genuine faith (even though we will not in this world, be able to fuly understand it), there is simply no other choice…Well, there is: one might insist on not using the words, like a child destroying his own playthings rather than let someone else play with them. But that seems to me to be intellectually dishonest, as well as futile; we end up with the same choice anyway.
The reasoning goes like this:

  1. *]Jesus Christ is God in human form.
    *]Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary.
    *]Therefore, it follows, that Mary was/is the mother of God.

  1. is!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top