The Mueller Report is Complete

  • Thread starter Thread starter angel12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cathoholic said:
I wonder if the left is going to proverbially eat Mueller?

Schiff and Swalwell both talking about putting Mueller under oath in Congressional hearings.

This is probably posturing for their fundraising base and Mueller will be brought aboard at CNN or MSNBC sometime before the election.

The left is pretty upset (and the politicians don’t want to come off too calm in the face of this).

I wonder if Pelosi knew this a week or two ago when she said there wasn’t enough there to bring impeachment charges against Trump? (She also said of President Trump then, that he wasn’t worth it.)
Click to expand...
Proverbial eat Mueller? I’m not seeing that all. However I do see a great interest in what is actually in the report which hasn’t been announced yet.

And no, democrats aren’t surprised. Truly the only thing that catapults rounds of excitement within left leaning circles is the frequent lying that comes from this administration…So when we have Truth coming from Washington these days, it’s refreshing to be honest.

However, it is not surprising to see the right make the monster that was Mueller, now declared a monk…hahaha

From the size of his audience in comparison to other presidents, to bigger, better, health-care for everybody that will be implemented on day 1 of his administration, to bringing back coal, to rolling back environmental protections for people like you, me, bears, dolphins, and water, to expirations on tax cuts for middle class but not big corp’s, to a big beautiful wall that Mexico will pay for,…….to polluted hot air in general…I am tired of all this truth!~……Most importantly, I’m tired of all this winning.
 
In what way?? I would like to know how he had anything to do with that infamous dossier that ALLEGED his collusion with Russia to affect the 2016 presidential elections.

That was the basis of the investigation afterall.
 
ProVobis said:
I believe Greenspan’s terminology “irrational exuberance” can be applied here.
Click to expand...
Odd, I thought that best described how the Dem party viewed this investigation all through the process, they were convinced it would lead to impeachment. Clearly they were being irrational.

Trump supporters are experiencing normal vindication, very basic, nothing more.
 
josie_L said:
That was the basis of the investigation afterall.
Click to expand...
you confuse the “basis” with the “scope” of the investigation…although, you, I or anyone outside the special counsel’s office or the Department of Justice, have not seen the report, even if the findings are (and admittedly they look like they might show no collusion), the scope may have found plenty of (and indeed did, based on the number of indictments) potential crimes…some of which might include wrong doing by POTUS that will be dealt with, if warranted, in due time by the courts in New York where investigations are already going on.

So, while I understand Trump supporters wanting to put the whole thing to bed, I think it far to early to prove there was no wrong doing by Trump outside the collusion issue.

Time will tell…people, including you and I, can spin it anyway they want.
 
That’s not what I’ve perceived or read, i.e., there were many Democrats, including members of the intelligence community (Brennan), who were claiming recently, more indictments were on the way that would affect Trump and his family.

So yes, I’m sure they WILL BE "SURPRISED"to know that there’s nothing there.

Let’s not pretend otherwise.

Rep. Eric Swalwell: I Won’t Accept Barr’s Version Of Mueller Report Unless Mueller Himself Testifies That It Is True​

 
By basis, I meant the main reason for the investigation, but regardless, my point remains, I don’t see how Trump did anything to implicate himself vis a vis the whole Trump/Russia allegation.

It was a done deal when the unverified Steele dossier (and it was at the time it was used to help issue warrants against Page) came into the picture courtesy of the Hillary campaign and the DNC who paid for it.

This is what helped set off FBI investigations and put Trump under the radar.
 
Last edited:
josie_L said:
By basis, I meant the main reason for the investigation, but regardless, my point remains, I don’t see how Trump did anything to implicate himself vis a vis the whole Trump/Russia allegation.
Click to expand...
Then we have no argument…we seem in complete agreement…except, because of the actions pending in the Southern Court of NY, Trump is far from being exonerated for any and all crimes.

For the good of the nation, I sincerely hope impeachment and removal from office is avoided (horror of horrors, giving the high office to Mike Pence!). And even if Trump is reelected, no big deal, because as a lame duck, his impact will be insignificant.

But, with all that said, conceding that indictment of a setting President is remote, there is always the possibility that after he leaves office, whether 2020 or 2024, he may spend his last days like Monafort, behind bars.
 
It won’t be surprising to hear Mueller speak on this, I agree with Swalwell, congress will have the right to question him, Mueller is a smart man, he’d expect as much, no surprises there. His conclusions matter, he investigated it.

Further more Mueller is a straight arrow. We as Americans don’t discount the findings of our intelligence community, FBI included. When they confirmed Russia meddled, Republicans played it down, didn’t hear about it much on Faux News…but now I believe they got the memo in the last 24 hours,Now, Mueller is the good guy!~

Welcome home and back to reason!~long time no see…hahahaha
 
truthnlife said:
the scope may have found plenty of (and indeed did, based on the number of indictments) potential crimes
Click to expand...
Yea, they found the equivalent of parking violations when they dredged through decades of activity unrelated to the campaign.

THERE WERE NO INDICTMENTS of the Trump team related to the purpose of the investigation - collusion with Russia.
 
Last edited:
Theo520 said:
Yea, the found the equivalent of parking violations when they dredged through decades of activity unrelated to the campaign.
Click to expand...
LOL…Do you think the Feds would view your not paying 25 Million dollars in tax liability, like Manaford equivalent to parking violations?
 
Mueller’s mandate was not to determine if there was collusion nor indictments for that matter. Denying something you’re not accused of is not a good defense in a court of law. But then Trump is well schooled in the court of public opinion, I will give him that much. So was Bill Clinton, btw, as his poll numbers rose after his impeachment.
 
Last edited:
No, I don’t per se, but again a far cry from what the media was insinuating and alleging prior to Manafort’s convictions.

And I still don’t like that gestapo-like manner in which his house was invaded and ransacked at dawn by the FBI to arrest Manafort.
 
Last edited:
I’m sorry, I was unaware that they were looking for tax fraud. I thought they were looking for treason.
 
False, money dictates agenda and it dictated the way in which the Democrats were obsessed with impeachment.

I would be more than happy to string up a list of those Democrats calling for Trump’s impeachment.
 
There were a few but probably not as many as Republicans after Bill Clinton’s head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top