The Mystery Of The Empty Tomb

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben_Masada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ben Masada;5430570:
There is a difference in answering an opinion and making a comment about the person.

You said that That is an attack on you not on what you have said. It is not acceptable.
Is not addressing what I have said but a personal attack. It is not acceptable
did not add anything to your post nor address any issue. It is better left unwritten.
same thing

Is a comment about what I said not what I am. It is not an attack.
Usually if it is a “you” statement it should be unwritten. It would be better to say things like “that statement is empty speculation” to avoid even a hint of attack. I hope I have clarified what is and isn’t an attack.
Yes, this post has indeed added more to my learning how to communicate than anything else. Thanks for the lesson.
 
What the Bible has to say==And on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came to the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared. 2 And they found the stone rolled back from the sepulchre. 3 And going in, they found not the body of the Lord Jesus. 4 And it came to pass, as they were astonished in their mind at this, behold, two men stood by them, in shining apparel. 5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their countenance towards the ground, they said unto them: Why seek you the living with the dead?

According to Mark 16:1, at the end of that Sabbath the women went to the tomb with perfumed oils to anoint Jesus’ body and found the tomb empty. In Israel the end of the Sabbath is at sunset. Give or take a few minutes for the women to arrive there, I find hard to account for three days and three nights in less than 24 hours.

6 He is not here, but is risen. Remember how he spoke unto you, when he was in Galilee, 7 Saying: The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. 8 And they remembered his words.

**The text does not say that Jesus was risen but raised. To be raised he needed an outside agent to do the action. **

Now you say after three days and telling all what is going to go on Our Lord move a very large stone( After being crucified) and just walk away so He was still strong to move a stone. Do You and planten realley think people will believe this garbage,( HERE IS NOT HERE HE HAS RISE) maybe He left Friday,and how may days did He hang on the cross,Being God You may be right.

Now, according to Adrift, this is a personal attack to charge someone of speaking garbage. And I didn’t say after three days. Matthew said three days and three nights. (Mat. 12:40) I said in less than 24 hours. And Jesus did not have to move that very large stone. It was moved from outside by Joseph of Arimathea and his helpers, including Dr. Nicodemus with about 100 pounds of medication to help Joseph with Jesus’ treatment.
And yes, the removal was done in the first hours of Friday night. Joseph would not leave Jesus to die in the tomb. Jesus hanged on the cross for about four hours. And last but not least, he was not God. He was a Jew, and in Judaism there is no such a thing as a man being God. Only in pagan Mythology.
 
Ben Can you tell us how the stone was removed did the guard help and after 3 days do you think Our Lord was still strong to walk away. After His was crucified you are saying He was still strong enough to wald away,and Please remember you say the man was not God
**The stone was removed by Joseph of Arimathea and his helpers, including Dr. Nicodemus with about 100 pounds of medication to help Joseph with Jesus’ treatment. There were no guards at the site and the stone was never sealed because it makes no sense. It serves only to increase the contradictions of the NT. There were no 3 days and 3 nights. That’s a blunder of Matthew’s. He was too busy looking for prophecies in the Tanach to document Jesus with, and found the one in Jonas and sticked it in. It didn’t work though. In less than 24 hours the tomb was officially empty.

No, your Lord was not strong at all to walk away, especially after his ordeal at the cross. He was carried away by the men of Joseph and Nicodemus. Yes, I remember to have said that he was not God. And he was not. He was a Jew just like any other.**
 
Matthew 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves[/INDENT]
**This is a classic antisemitic statement. I am almost 100 percent sure that it came out of the lips of Paul, and was put down by the Gentile disciple of his who wrote the gospel of Matthew. Jesus could have never offended his colleagues in that manner. He would have broken the Golden Rule of not doing unto others what we would not like they did unto us. Therefore, you could no longer claim that he was sinless. And why Paul? Because he always had a grudge against the Jewish authorities, especially the Pharisees for having never allowed him to build a church in Israeli soil. **
 
You provoked me. I know that the truth sometimes does sound arrogant, especially to those who can’t stand reality.
 
Didn’t Middle Eastern Goddesses, like Inanna and Ishtar, have a habit of disappearing into the underworld for three days and nights before resurrecting?
 
Didn’t Middle Eastern Goddesses, like Inanna and Ishtar, have a habit of disappearing into the underworld for three days and nights before resurrecting?
Do you know something Kaninchen? I have read something like that about Lilit, a Middle Eastern female demon that would disappear into the wilderness for about three days and three night until her next mischief. That’s an interesting observation. Now, I am left wondering about the connection here with the tale of the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40.
 
Do you know something Kaninchen? I have read something like that about Lilit, a Middle Eastern female demon that would disappear into the wilderness for about three days and three night until her next mischief. That’s an interesting observation. Now, I am left wondering about the connection here with the tale of the three days and three nights of Matthew 12:40.
The ‘descent into the underworld’ was a common theme in Sumerian/Babylonian/Canaanite religion - the Goddess has to face up to all her fears, emotions and weaknesses before she can become the transcendent ‘Great Goddess’.

[Lilith turns up in the story of the Sumerian ‘Great Goddess’ Inanna and the Huluppu tree, by the way, as a ‘fair’ but ‘wild’ maid side of the young goddess that has to be overcome before she can reach adulthood - she’s driven away into the wilderness. I expect our traditions about Lilit are echoes of the ‘folk lore’ of very early days.]
 
Did they put a spear in Jesus???and water come out or did I read that right
Yes, that is true, in the bibleNT The water and blood spurted out of the wound. We also know that blood does not gush out of a dead person due to cogulation. So Jesus was alive when the spear was thurst into his side. Most likely.
 
Bill Pick;5432020:
What the Bible has to say==And on the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came to the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared. 2 And they found the stone rolled back from the sepulchre. 3 And going in, they found not the body of the Lord Jesus. 4 And it came to pass, as they were astonished in their mind at this, behold, two men stood by them, in shining apparel. 5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their countenance towards the ground, they said unto them: Why seek you the living with the dead?

According to Mark 16:1, at the end of that Sabbath the women went to the tomb with perfumed oils to anoint Jesus’ body and found the tomb empty. In Israel the end of the Sabbath is at sunset. Give or take a few minutes for the women to arrive there, I find hard to account for three days and three nights in less than 24 hours.
6 He is not here, but is risen. Remember how he spoke unto you, when he was in Galilee, 7 Saying: The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. 8 And they remembered his words.

**The text does not say that Jesus was risen but raised. To be raised he needed an outside agent to do the action. **

Now you say after three days and telling all what is going to go on Our Lord move a very large stone( After being crucified) and just walk away so He was still strong to move a stone. Do You and planten realley think people will believe this garbage,( HERE IS NOT HERE HE HAS RISE) maybe He left Friday,and how may days did He hang on the cross,Being God You may be right.

Now, according to Adrift, this is a personal attack to charge someone of speaking garbage. And I didn’t say after three days. Matthew said three days and three nights. (Mat. 12:40) I said in less than 24 hours. And Jesus did not have to move that very large stone. It was moved from outside by Joseph of Arimathea and his helpers, including Dr. Nicodemus with about 100 pounds of medication to help Joseph with Jesus’ treatment.
And yes, the removal was done in the first hours of Friday night. Joseph would not leave Jesus to die in the tomb. Jesus hanged on the cross for about four hours. And last but not least, he was not God. He was a Jew, and in Judaism there is no such a thing as a man being God.
Only in pagan Mythology.

**So much so good, Ben. I have made some of your words extra bold. I personally wanted to know about the recent or very old custom of the Jews to perfume the dead body before burial. Is there such a custom?. Or there used to be any custom in the very old times?. After all, the ladies mentioned who came to perfume the body of Jesus could not be doing something seriously wrong, unless Jesus was alive.

If a dead man (a Jew) is not applied with medicines (Herbs) by the hands of ladies then the ladies (Mostly Mary Magd.) were doing something wrong. Please tell all about the Jewish custom of that time about anointing the dead body. Thanks.**
 
Any good book of Grammar can be a source document.
Most grammar books do not talk about the actions open to the Omnipotent Being. I want a source that says “to raise” requires physical hands-on action.
 
**Sorry pal, but how do you explain the massive Jewish influence in the winning side of Nobel Prizes? Visit any University, the Jewish representation in the Faculty of Professors is alarming. Go to any hospital, the best Doctors are Jewish. And usually they are enormously represented. Look at the size of a Spilberg in Hollywood. Is it by accident that he is Jewish? Einstein, Freud, and if you keep on the search, you won’t finish. Since we are talking about religion, look at the giant religion Paul built. If he had not been Jewish, Christianity perhaps would not be better than a backward little cult in an unnown village somewhere in a third country. I am sorry if it seems to you arrogance, but don’t you think it would be much easier to acknowledge a little credit to whom the credit is due? **
 
**Sorry pal, but how do you explain the massive Jewish influence in the winning side of Nobel Prizes? … I am sorry if it seems to you arrogance, but don’t you think it would be much easier to acknowledge a little credit to whom the credit is due? **
Ben-I believe Jharak was saying that “The Jews are God’s chosen people but the Bible makes it plain they were not chosen because of any innate personal superiorty” of Jews over Gentiles. (emphasis added). I (and Jharak, it appears) believe the dominance the Jews have in a wide variety of disciplines is because they are God’s chosen people. Not that they are any better than Gentiles in and of themselves. They have God’s help.

Regards,
SteveLohr
 
Was that necessary to refer to me personally with being funny? Anyone could see a personal attack in that statement.
Ben Why do you say this is a personal attack,the story of the three little pigs is not a attack,so why is your story a attack . Maybe He was “rising” by His Father,after He was “crucified” a guard was left at the tome
 
Was that necessary to refer to me personally with being funny? Anyone could see a personal attack in that statement.
Ben
I never said I was perfect. I am far from it. It was an unnecessary sarcastic remark for which I apologize. I should have just asked what leligious meant. I realize now, that you meant religious. I think both our communications will benefit from using more courtesy. What is hard is not to respond in kind when others do not. You are also correct when you said you can be to sensitive. An even balance, is a good thing.
 
**Sorry pal, but how do you explain the massive Jewish influence in the winning side of Nobel Prizes? Visit any University, the Jewish representation in the Faculty of Professors is alarming. Go to any hospital, the best Doctors are Jewish. And usually they are enormously represented. Look at the size of a Spilberg in Hollywood. Is it by accident that he is Jewish? Einstein, Freud, and if you keep on the search, you won’t finish. Since we are talking about religion, look at the giant religion Paul built. If he had not been Jewish, Christianity perhaps would not be better than a backward little cult in an unnown village somewhere in a third country. I am sorry if it seems to you arrogance, but don’t you think it would be much easier to acknowledge a little credit to whom the credit is due? **
I have read you posts with great interest. It must be very dfficult for you to have to deal with people not quite on your intelectual level and I appreciate you trying to dumb down your responses for those of us not fortunate to have been as gifted as you.

I think one could summarize your assertions as follows:
  1. You know Jesus did not rise from the dead because you found one word in scripture that proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt.
  2. Jesus did not die on the cross , he merely fainted. Your basis for this claim is that since you know from your personal interpretation of one word of Scripture that he could not have risen from the dead he could not have died on the cross depsite the eyewitness accounts to the contrary.
  3. Jesus was just one of thousands of Jews crucified but the only one who lived through it appraently being fortunate enough to have inept Legionaires doing the job(who still, depite their ineptness , managed to kill the other two he was crucified with).
  4. We need to accept your pronouncement as gospel (pun intended) becuase you are one of the chosen people. You know that Jews are the chosen people because they have won gobs of Nobel prizes(does that make Al Gore a Jew?) and makes really neat movies.
Have missed anything?
 
Most grammar books do not talk about the actions open to the Omnipotent Being. I want a source that says “to raise” requires physical hands-on action.
If we need to raise something from somewhere, isn’t obvious that it requires a physical hands-on action? Therefore, the source is Logic. To rise no, there is no hands-on action. The sun, for example, rises; it is not raised. If Jesus had really resurrected, he would have risen and not been raised. To rise is inherent in the agent; to be raised, the action is remote from the agent.
 
**The stone was removed by Joseph of Arimathea and his helpers, including Dr. Nicodemus with about 100 pounds of medication to help Joseph with Jesus’ treatment. There were no guards at the site and the stone was never sealed because it makes no sense. It serves only to increase the contradictions of the NT. There were no 3 days and 3 nights. That’s a blunder of Matthew’s. He was too busy looking for prophecies in the Tanach to document Jesus with, and found the one in Jonas and sticked it in. It didn’t work though. In less than 24 hours the tomb was officially empty.

No, your Lord was not strong at all to walk away, especially after his ordeal at the cross. He was carried away by the men of Joseph and Nicodemus. Yes, I remember to have said that he was not God. And he was not. He was a Jew just like any other.**
Since the question hasn’t been answered, I will ask again. Where does the information come from that Nicodemus was a doctor? The three days and three nights have been explained. Are you saying it was not the custom of the Jews to count a part of a day as a full day? Jesus was on the cross for six hours not four. Although some took days to die that was not always the case. Death by crucifixion was anywhere from six hours to four days. Jesus died at three in the afternoon. Twenty four hours later is 3 Saturday afternoon. Sunday morning is when Jesus resurrected that would be more than 24 hours. It was according to the way they figured days was that even a part was considered as one. That means Friday would be one day, Saturday two and Sunday three. So no blunder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top