The natural world as evidence

  • Thread starter Thread starter Athrond
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
miguel:
If NASA’s approach was false, it wouldn’t work.
I did not say it was false. Ultimately (in terms of relative motions) they are equivalent. Either will work for the purpose of navigating the solar system. The “driver” of a spaceship will end up doing the same things at the same time regardlerss of what he “believes” is moving and what he “believes” is stationary. The relative positions, velocities, and accelerations are the same in both systems. In fact they are simply coordinate transforms of each other.

Mark
www.veritas-catholic.blogspot.com
 
40.png
trth_skr:
I did not say it was false. Ultimately (in terms of relative motions) they are equivalent. Either will work for the purpose of navigating the solar system. The “driver” of a spaceship will end up doing the same things at the same time regardlerss of what he “believes” is moving and what he “believes” is stationary. The relative positions, velocities, and accelerations are the same in both systems. In fact they are simply coordinate transforms of each other.
It’s much easier to visualize periodic elliptical planetary motion around the sun using heliocentric coordinates. Since our historical planetary observations were made from earth, it took us a long time to figure out that the motion was elliptical. And that is my point, a good observation point and a good choice of coordinates would have made life so much easier.
 
40.png
miguel:
It’s much easier to visualize periodic elliptical planetary motion around the sun using heliocentric coordinates. Since our historical planetary observations were made from earth, it took us a long time to figure out that the motion was elliptical. And that is my point, a good observation point and a good choice of coordinates would have made life so much easier.
That is a fallacy. The sun moves arouind the earth on daily basis with near circular motion. On an annual basis it can be seen to be actually traveling on the 23.5 deg. elliptic.

The planets orbit the sun with elliptical orbits (earth not a planet).

Makes no difference.

Mark
www.veritas-catholic.blogspot.com
 
40.png
trth_skr:
That is a fallacy. The sun moves arouind the earth on daily basis with near circular motion. On an annual basis it can be seen to be actually traveling on the 23.5 deg. elliptic.

The planets orbit the sun with elliptical orbits (earth not a planet).
…not what they told me in AE 580.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top