The next step after gay marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter on_the_hill
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
DaddyGirl said:
They didn’t say they would no longer print them; they said they would “limit” the amount, since the legal debate in the Supreme Court is over for now.

.
Click to expand...
Sounds to me like they are afraid of what we have to say.
 
unstoppable_II said:
A Pennsylvania newspaper has notified the world that it will no longer print anti-gay marriage op-eds or letters to the editor. Should the opinion pages be declared public accommodations?
DaddyGirl;13097951:
They didn’t say they would no longer
Click to expand...
print them; they said they would “limit” the amount, since the legal debate in the Supreme Court is over for now…
Click to expand...
Actually, the paper did indicate they would no longer print them. Then, only after receiving strong pushback, they again revised their policy and said they would print some opposition for a limited period of time.

THE SILENCING: Paper Will Limit Anti-Gay Marriage Op-Eds
dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/the-silencing-paper-will-limit-anti-gay-marriage-op-eds/

Newspaper faces firestorm after attempted crack-down on anti-gay marriage op-eds
foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/27/newspaper-faces-firestorm-after-attempted-crack-down-on-anti-gay-marriage-op/
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
Here is a thought on the subject…

How will a sociology teacher handle the explanation of gay marriage, if the teacher is Catholic?
Click to expand...
Good Catholics do not go into sociology.

That is a nest of subjective vipers. 😉
 
kozlosap said:
The study of society is akin to a nest of vipers? That’s a new one. :eek:
Click to expand...
Most of the sociologists I have read are atheistic/agnostic relativists.

A nest of vipers from my point of view. You are welcome to think kindly of them. 🤷
 
Bradski said:
That’s like asking how would an economics teacher handle Obamacare if he was a Republican. You don’t have to support something to be able to explain it.

And in any case, if the teacher is Catholic, the chances are that he or she has no problem with gay marriage in the first place.
Click to expand...
…But Brad…to a REAL Catholic, gay marriage does not exist.
 
I WAS WRONG

I originally posted that pedophilia would be the next step after gay marriage…but it looks like the polygamist are making the first move…

krtv.com/story/29450937/m…rriage-license

It seems that I remember a very ardent gay supporter here on the forum assuring me that this would “never happen”. 😉
 
Zoltan_Cobalt said:
I WAS WRONG

I originally posted that pedophilia would be the next step after gay marriage…but it looks like the polygamist are making the first move…

krtv.com/story/29450937/m…rriage-license

It seems that I remember a very ardent gay supporter here on the forum assuring me that this would “never happen”. 😉
Click to expand...
The deviant agenda will be accelerating in the speed of its quest to destroy all that is right, good, and true.

The Pandora box has been opened.
 
Eddie_Mac said:
The deviant agenda will be accelerating in the speed of its quest to destroy all that is right, good, and true.

The Pandora box has been opened.
Click to expand...
Isaiah 5:20 ►

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”

What the radical leftists never stop to consider is that history is cyclical. The pendulum sooner or later will swing back in the opposite direction, and some will be caught like deer staring at the headlights.
 
SuperLuigi said:
Well, polygamy and under-age girls have this tendency to cross each other.
Click to expand...
Ive been in other similar discussions on this topic in the past, before SSM was passed, Ive always thought legalized pedophilia was going to be a reality here eventually, still do, I did not see polygamy coming first though, that was a bit of a surprise to me, although I do agree the two go hand in hand to some degree, maybe thats why they feel polygamy must go first, then it will allow more time for people to become accepting to more extremes (like pedophilia).

The key problem is everyone wanting to be accepted, no matter how deviant they are, and what their sexual preferences are, the US is slowly heading towards condoning just about anything and everything of the sort, Pedophilia is still a touchy subject though, people do get upset about it, go looking for vigilante justice due to it, but in the courtrooms, they tend to give out pretty lenient sentences for these crimes, Im not sure if that has to do with politics/ voting years (which Ive heard).

Im confident the polygamists will get their wish easily, then that will be legal in all 50 states and it must be recognized…the time is ripe for it!
 
mikekle said:
…then that will be legal in all 50 states and it must be recognized…the time is ripe for it!
Click to expand...
Maybe there will be a move to drop the age whereby you can marry (and hence have sex) year by year.

So what do you think, personally, that age should be? We can then compare that to various religions and see how it all stacks up. Or maybe you think it should depend on the maturity of the person in question. In which case…who decides on the difference between an imature eighteen year old and a very mature fourteen year old?
 
Book_Worm said:
When I was growing up, one of the arguments I heard to reinforce the concept that African Americans were somehow “less than” was their propensity to live in substandard housing but drive expensive cars. When I got a little older, I realized that, at that point in time, AA’s were prohibited from living in most of the better areas and therefore used their discretionary income for better cars since car dealers were happy to take anyone’s money, no matter what their skin color was.

I wonder if this isn’t related to those statistics about gay relationships. Most grew up knowing that a stable marriage was not available to them and formed a different opinion about choosing a partner. Even those who were in long-term relationships and, more recently, marriages did not have the backing of a supportive society behind them as heterosexual couples.
Click to expand...
I think Gays can be described as fairly disordered people.To go a little further I don’t think it’s fair to equate and or compare them with African American’s. There are no true similarities between the two populations. It’s fantasy to pretend that they are simply people with a different view on things.

I imagine and or fear that the Catholic Church, and other denominations who stick to their values will eventually be equated, and or compared with the Ku Klux Klan. Is that going to be fair?
 
Mickey_Finn said:
I imagine and or fear that the Catholic Church, and other denominations who stick to their values will eventually be equated, and or compared with the Ku Klux Klan. Is that going to be fair?
Click to expand...
Catholics already are fair game so far as the media and academia are concerned.

There’s a substantive difference between Catholics and KKK.

The KKK have gone underground, as the Catholics once did in the catacombs.

There are not enough caves to house all the Catholics, nor even those who falsely claim to be Catholic. So we will continue to be fair game for a long time to come.

But we are in good company, said the One who called us blessed if we would be persecuted in his name.
 
mikekle said:
Ive been in other similar discussions on this topic in the past, before SSM was passed, Ive always thought legalized pedophilia was going to be a reality here eventually, still do, I did not see polygamy coming first though, that was a bit of a surprise to me, although I do agree the two go hand in hand to some degree, maybe thats why they feel polygamy must go first, then it will allow more time for people to become accepting to more extremes (like pedophilia).
Click to expand...
When the first case rises to the Supreme Court demanding the legalization of incestuous marriage, it will be weird to hear how the Supreme court will find a right for that stated in the Constitution. Same for polygamy.

The present Supreme Court is shamefully loaded with five dunces.
 
Charlemagne_III said:
When the first case rises to the Supreme Court demanding the legalization of incestuous marriage, it will be weird to hear how the Supreme court will find a right for that stated in the Constitution. Same for polygamy.

The present Supreme Court is shamefully loaded with five dunces.
Click to expand...
Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t sodomy legalized by the Supreme Court in 2003…isn’t that what has led up to the present situation where we now have same sex marriage…and if you believe polls then the majority of Americans accepted SSM…incest…polygamy…pedophilia…bestiality are all illegal…is that correct…if so then those in favor of those things would have to get them legalized by the Supreme Court before they could even think of getting the law changed so they could marry…I don’t think even the most liberal judge would ever contemplate supporting any of those abominations…nor would just about every American citizen…I think this is just a storm in a teacup reaction to the Supreme Court passing SSM …I don’t support SSM and I don’t agree with the courts decision…but I don’t believe these other abominations would even get to first base…I hope not.
 
Peebo said:
Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t sodomy legalized by the Supreme Court in 2003…isn’t that what has led up to the present situation where we now have same sex marriage…and if you believe polls then the majority of Americans accepted SSM…incest…polygamy…pedophilia…bestiality are all illegal…is that correct…if so then those in favor of those things would have to get them legalized by the Supreme Court before they could even think of getting the law changed so they could marry…I don’t think even the most liberal judge would ever contemplate supporting any of those abominations…nor would just about every American citizen…I think this is just a storm in a teacup reaction to the Supreme Court passing SSM …I don’t support SSM and I don’t agree with the courts decision…but I don’t believe these other abominations would even get to first base…I hope not.
Click to expand...
When the door to legalizing abominations is opened, there is no logical argument for closing it.

First pornography made legal, then abortion, now same-sex marriage.

Those who favor abominations will never stop clamoring for more and more of them.

And it would after all be discrimination to favor one abomination while denying another. 🤷
 
Charlemagne_III said:
What does it tell us about the leadership of the Catholic Church in America that instead of rushing to condemn the action of the Supreme Court, the American bishops are flocking to figure out how they are going to withstand lawsuits against the Church for unconstitutional sexual discrimination? :confused:

And how much longer are Americans going to bow to this wicked insanity? 🤷

aleteia.org/en/society/article/fordham-university-theology-department-chairman-marries-another-man-5835364719656960
Click to expand...
Condemning the supreme court is not a productive course of action. I have heard plenty of talk from our bishops about the sanctity of marriage. Our bishops do not rule civil society, they lead the Church.

Everyone wants separation between church and state, and we have it. (to the detriment of all).
 
clem456 said:
Condemning the supreme court is not a productive course of action. I have heard plenty of talk from our bishops about the sanctity of marriage. Our bishops do not rule civil society, they lead the Church.
Click to expand...
It is true that our bishops do not rule civil society but they are very clear about this Supreme Court decision;

From my Sunday Bulletin:

“Regardless of what a narrow majority of the Supreme Court may declare at this moment in history, the nature of the human person and **marriage remains unchanged and unchangeable.” **​

Archbishop Kurtz, President of the USCCB

usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/marriage/promotion-and-defense-of-marriage/upload/Bulletin-AFTER-Scotus-brown.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top